Motorola ThinkPhone vs Oppo Reno11 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 29, 2023 January 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 98.06 cm³ 95.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.5 "/g 3.68 "/g
Weight 188.5 g 182 g
Height 158.8 mm 162.4 mm
Width 74.4 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Carbon Black
  • Wave Green
  • Rock Grey

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89 % 89.5 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 950 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.99 mAh/cm³ 52.45 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola ThinkPhoneOppo Reno11Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.8 x 74.4 x 8.3162.4 x 74.3 x 7.9ThinkPhone slightly shorter, Reno11 slightly thinner. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)188.5182ThinkPhone slightly heavier, but both are within a comfortable range.
Build MaterialMissingMissingCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display TypeP-OLEDAMOLEDBoth offer excellent color accuracy and deep blacks.
Display Size (inches)6.66.7Reno11 has a marginally larger screen.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2412Virtually identical resolution, resulting in similar sharpness.
Refresh Rate (Hz)144120ThinkPhone's higher refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations. Noticeable in gaming and fast-paced UI interactions.
Peak Brightness (nits)12001400 (HBM) / 950 (typical)Reno11 has a higher peak brightness, improving outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Dimensity 7050ThinkPhone's Snapdragon offers significantly better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming capabilities.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.19 GHz X2 & 3x2.75 GHz A710 & 4x1.80 GHz A510)Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)ThinkPhone's CPU architecture is more powerful and efficient.
RAM (GB)88/12Reno11 offers a 12GB RAM option, potentially improving multitasking for heavy users. However, ThinkPhone's superior processor may offset this in real-world usage.
OSAndroid 13Android 14Reno11 ships with the latest Android version, offering potential new features and longer software support.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Both have similar main camera resolution. Image quality depends on sensor and processing, which needs further analysis beyond stated specs.
Ultrawide (MP)138ThinkPhone has a higher resolution ultrawide camera.
Telephoto (MP)Missing32Reno11 features a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom, lacking in the ThinkPhone.
Selfie Camera (MP)3232Similar selfie camera resolution.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@30fpsUp to 4K@30fpsThinkPhone capable of higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004800ThinkPhone has slightly larger battery capacity. Real-world battery life depends on optimization and usage.
Fast Charging (W)6867Nearly identical fast charging speeds.
Wireless Charging15WMissingThinkPhone supports wireless charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola ThinkPhone Advantages:

  • Significantly superior performance: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a substantial performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher refresh rate display: Smoother and more responsive user experience.
  • Wireless Charging: Added convenience.

Oppo Reno11 Advantages:

  • Newer Android version: Potentially longer software updates and new features.
  • Dedicated telephoto lens: Optical zoom capabilities for better image quality at longer distances.
  • Higher peak brightness: Better outdoor visibility.
  • Lower Price: Based on the provided pricing data, the Reno11 is significantly cheaper.

Trade-offs:

  • ThinkPhone sacrifices a telephoto lens for potentially better overall performance.
  • Reno11 compromises on processing power for a lower price point and a telephoto lens.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola ThinkPhone Ideal User:

  • Power users who prioritize performance and a smooth user experience.
  • Mobile gamers.
  • Users who value wireless charging.

Oppo Reno11 Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users who prioritize camera versatility, especially zoom capabilities.
  • Users who prefer the latest Android features.
  • Users who prioritize a brighter display for outdoor use.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Reno11 offers significantly better value in terms of price.
  2. Is performance a priority? If yes, the ThinkPhone is the clear winner.
  3. Do you need a telephoto lens for zoom photography? If yes, the Reno11 is the better choice.

My Choice: Motorola ThinkPhone

While the Oppo Reno11 offers a compelling package for the price, I would choose the Motorola ThinkPhone. The superior performance provided by the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a significant factor for me. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, which is further enhanced by the 144Hz display. While the lack of a dedicated telephoto lens is a drawback, the overall performance and user experience benefits of the ThinkPhone outweigh this for my personal needs. The inclusion of wireless charging is another plus. While the Reno11 is an excellent value option, the ThinkPhone's performance advantage makes it the better choice for my usage patterns.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.