Motorola ThinkPhone vs Motorola Razr 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 29, 2023 June 5, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 98.06 cm³ 88.47 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.5 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 188.5 g 184.5 g
Height 158.8 mm 170.8 mm
Width 74.4 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 7 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Carbon Black
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 165 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 79.82 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.99 mAh/cm³ 42.95 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3800 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 730 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola ThinkPhoneMotorola Razr 40 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.8 x 74.4 x 8.3170.8 x 74 x 7Razr 40 Ultra is significantly thinner when folded but taller when unfolded. ThinkPhone is wider.
Weight (g)188.5184.5Negligible weight difference in practical use.
FoldableNoYesRazr's foldable design offers portability but introduces potential durability concerns.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.9 (main), ~3.6 (cover)Razr offers a larger main display and a usable cover display for quick interactions.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2640Similar sharpness due to size differences; Razr slightly sharper.
Refresh Rate (Hz)144165Razr offers smoother scrolling and animations, especially noticeable in gaming.
Display TypeP-OLEDLTPO AMOLEDBoth offer excellent color and contrast; LTPO allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, potentially saving battery on the Razr.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1Identical performance in terms of processing power and graphics capabilities.
RAM (GB)88/12Razr offers a 12GB RAM option for potentially better multitasking performance.
OSAndroid 13Android 13Similar software experience, though long-term updates are confirmed up to Android 16 for the Razr.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5012ThinkPhone boasts a higher resolution main sensor, potentially capturing more detail. Razr utilizes a 12MP sensor focusing on low-light performance indicated by the wider aperture (f/1.5). More information is needed to properly compare image quality.
Ultrawide (MP)1313Similar ultrawide capabilities.
Selfie (MP)3232Equivalent selfie camera resolution.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50003800ThinkPhone offers significantly longer battery life.
Fast Charging (W)6830ThinkPhone charges much faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola ThinkPhone Advantages:

  • Significantly longer battery life: The 5000mAh battery provides a substantial advantage for power users.
  • Faster Charging: 68W fast charging replenishes the battery quickly.
  • Potentially better main camera image quality: The 50MP sensor might offer more detail. Further analysis is required to confirm this.
  • Rugged Design: While not explicitly stated, the "ThinkPhone" branding suggests a focus on durability.

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers unparalleled portability and a unique form factor.
  • Larger Main Display: Provides more screen real estate for media consumption and multitasking.
  • Faster Refresh Rate: Smoother visuals enhance the user experience.
  • External Display: Allows for quick interactions without unfolding the phone.
  • More RAM in higher configuration: The 12GB RAM option can improve multitasking.
  • Longer Software Support: Confirmed updates up to Android 16.

Trade-offs:

  • Razr 40 Ultra: Smaller battery capacity for a foldable design and higher price for more RAM.
  • ThinkPhone: Less innovative design and potentially less enjoyable media consumption due to a smaller, lower refresh rate screen.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola ThinkPhone: Ideal for business professionals, power users, or anyone prioritizing battery life, fast charging, and potentially a more robust build. Excellent for productivity tasks, extended use without charging, and demanding applications.

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Best suited for users who value portability and a unique form factor above all else. The external display enhances usability on the go. Appealing to those who prioritize style and cutting-edge technology.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is battery life? If all-day battery life is crucial, the ThinkPhone is the clear winner.
  2. Is portability or screen size a top priority? The Razr's foldable design offers unmatched portability, while its larger main screen is better for media consumption.
  3. What is your budget? The Razr generally commands a higher price, especially for the 12GB RAM version.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy user needing reliable battery: ThinkPhone
  • Frequent traveler wanting a compact device: Razr 40 Ultra
  • User prioritizing the latest technology and style: Razr 40 Ultra
  • Budget-conscious user seeking performance and long battery life: ThinkPhone

My Choice: Motorola ThinkPhone

While the Razr 40 Ultra is undeniably cool with its innovative foldable design, the ThinkPhone better suits my needs. I prioritize long battery life and fast charging, which are essential for my daily workflow. The potential for a more rugged design also appeals to me. While I appreciate the Razr's larger and smoother display, the trade-offs in battery capacity and charging speed are too significant for me. I am also not willing to pay extra for the foldable form factor. The ThinkPhone provides excellent performance and a dependable user experience without sacrificing practicality.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.