Motorola ThinkPhone vs Motorola Razr 40 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date January 29, 2023 June 21, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 98.06 cm³ 93.53 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.5 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 188.5 g 188.6 g
Height 158.8 mm 170.8 mm
Width 74.4 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Carbon Black
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89 % 85.2 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1400 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.99 mAh/cm³ 44.91 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 730 Adreno 644

Connectivity

USB Version 3.1 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 3.1, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola ThinkPhoneMotorola Razr 40Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)158.8 x 74.4 x 8.3170.8 x 74 x 7.4Razr 40 is taller and slightly thinner when unfolded, ThinkPhone is wider. Razr 40's foldability offers portability advantage.
Weight (g)188.5188.6Virtually identical weight.
FoldableNoYesRazr 40's foldability allows for pocketability and a unique form factor, potentially at the cost of durability.
Display
Display TypeP-OLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDRazr 40's LTPO panel may offer better battery efficiency due to variable refresh rate; however, the provided specs don't confirm if it's a true variable refresh rate implementation. Foldable display introduces a crease.
Size (inches)6.66.9Razr 40 offers a slightly larger screen when unfolded.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2640Razr 40 has a slightly higher resolution, resulting in marginally sharper text and images. Difference is negligible in practice.
Refresh Rate (Hz)144144Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)12001400Razr 40 should be more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Snapdragon 7 Gen 1ThinkPhone boasts significantly superior processing power for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)ThinkPhone's CPU offers significantly better performance across the board.
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 644ThinkPhone will offer a smoother gaming experience and better performance in graphically demanding applications.
RAM (GB)88Both have ample RAM for multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5064Razr 40 has a higher resolution main sensor, potentially capturing more detail. However, sensor size and processing play a larger role in image quality, which cannot be fully determined from these specs.
Other Cameras13MP Wide + Macro, 2MP Depth13MP Wide + MacroLargely similar secondary camera setups. ThinkPhone's depth sensor may offer slightly better portrait mode shots.
Video RecordingUp to 8K@30fpsUp to 4K@30fpsThinkPhone offers higher resolution video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50004200ThinkPhone boasts significantly longer battery life.
Fast Charging (W)6833ThinkPhone charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola ThinkPhone Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 offers a substantial performance advantage for demanding tasks, multitasking, and gaming.
  • Longer Battery Life: The 5000 mAh battery and faster charging provide significantly longer usage time and quicker replenishment.
  • More robust build (likely): While not explicitly stated, the ThinkPhone's design likely prioritizes durability over thinness.

Motorola Razr 40 Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers unique portability and a compact form factor.
  • Brighter Display: Enhanced outdoor visibility.
  • Lower Price: Offers a more affordable entry point into the smartphone market.

Trade-offs:

  • Razr 40: Sacrifices performance and battery life for foldability and a lower price.
  • ThinkPhone: Prioritizes performance and battery life over portability and novelty.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

ThinkPhone Ideal User:

  • Power users who demand high performance for gaming, productivity, or heavy multitasking.
  • Professionals who need a reliable and long-lasting device.
  • Users who prioritize performance and battery life over portability and novel features.

Razr 40 Ideal User:

  • Style-conscious users who value a compact and unique form factor.
  • Users who prioritize portability and pocketability above all else.
  • Budget-conscious buyers seeking a trendy foldable phone with decent features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Razr 40 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What is your priority: performance or portability? The ThinkPhone excels in performance, while the Razr 40 prioritizes portability.
  3. How important is battery life to you? The ThinkPhone offers significantly longer battery life.

My Choice: Motorola ThinkPhone

While the Razr 40's foldable design is intriguing, the ThinkPhone's superior performance, significantly longer battery life, and faster charging are more important to me. As someone who uses their phone heavily for productivity and entertainment, I value a smooth and reliable experience, which the ThinkPhone's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 and large battery can deliver. The price difference isn't substantial enough to justify the compromises in performance and battery life for the foldability of the Razr 40. Furthermore, the potential durability concerns associated with foldable phones make the ThinkPhone a more sensible choice for long-term use.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.