Motorola Razr 50 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola

General

Launch Date June 25, 2024 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 92.54 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 188.4 g 189 g
Height 171.3 mm 164.1 mm
Width 74 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 7.3 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Koala Grey (Steel Wool)
  • Beach Sand (Pumice Stone)
  • Spritz Orange (Arabesque)
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 3000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 88.22 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.39 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4200 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G615 MC2 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 50ZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mm (folded)164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6 mmRazr 50 is significantly more compact when folded, enhancing portability; A75 is a traditional slab design.
Weight188.4 g189 gNegligible weight difference.
FoldableYesNoRazr 50 offers a larger screen in a smaller form factor when folded.
Display
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDIPS LCDRazr 50 provides significantly better contrast, colors, and viewing angles due to AMOLED technology.
Size6.9"6.6"Razr 50 offers a larger display area overall.
Resolution1080 x 2640720 x 1612Razr 50 has a much sharper display (413 ppi vs 267 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate120Hz90HzRazr 50 provides smoother animations and scrolling.
Peak Brightness3000 nitsNot specifiedRazr 50's superior brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight. The lack of data for the A75 prevents a direct comparison.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)Razr 50's more advanced and efficient chipset will deliver significantly better performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Razr 50's CPU has faster cores and a more modern architecture, leading to significantly improved performance.
GPUMali-G615 MC2Mali-G57 MP1Razr 50's GPU offers better gaming and graphics performance.
RAM12GB4GBRazr 50's larger RAM enables better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps.
Storage512GB256GBRazr 50 offers double the storage capacity.
Battery
Capacity4200 mAh5000 mAhA75 has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life. However, Razr 50's more efficient processor might offset this difference.
Camera
Video Capabilities4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p@30/60fps (EIS)1080p@30fpsRazr 50 offers higher resolution video recording (4K) and image stabilization (EIS) at higher frame rates, resulting in superior video quality.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 50 Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers a large screen in a compact, pocketable form factor.
  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology delivers vibrant colors, deep blacks, and excellent viewing angles. Higher resolution and refresh rate enhance clarity and smoothness.
  • Significantly Better Performance: More powerful processor and larger RAM enable smooth multitasking and demanding applications, including gaming.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Potentially Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity suggests longer usage time, although real-world performance depends on usage patterns and software optimization.
  • Lower Price: Positioned in the low price range, offering greater affordability.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 50: Ideal for users who value portability and a large screen, prioritize performance for demanding tasks and multimedia consumption, and are willing to pay a premium for innovative design and technology. Use cases: Content creation, mobile gaming, multitasking on the go.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functionality, such as calling, texting, web browsing, and social media. Use cases: Casual usage, students, first-time smartphone users.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Budget: How much are you willing to spend on a smartphone?
  2. Performance Needs: Do you require high performance for gaming, multitasking, or demanding applications?
  3. Form Factor: Do you prioritize portability and a compact design, or is a larger, traditional smartphone acceptable?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Needs: ZTE Blade A75 4G
  • Prioritize Performance and Innovation: Motorola Razr 50
  • Value Portability and Large Screen: Motorola Razr 50
  • Heavy Multitasker or Mobile Gamer: Motorola Razr 50
Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.