Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Xiaomi Redmi 14C - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 25, 2024 August 30, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 90.05 cm³ 109.67 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.65 "/g 3.26 "/g
Weight 189 g 211 g
Height 171.4 mm 171.9 mm
Width 74 mm 77.8 mm
Thickness 7.1 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)
  • Midnight Black
  • Starry Blue
  • Sage Green
  • Dreamy Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.88 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 720 x 1640
Aspect Ratio 22:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 84 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness 3000 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 84.02 mAh/in² 109.01 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.42 mAh/cm³ 47.05 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4000 mAh 5160 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 735 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs. Xiaomi Redmi 14C

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 50 UltraXiaomi Redmi 14CPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mm (folded)171.9 x 77.8 x 8.2 mmRazr 50 Ultra significantly more compact when folded, pocketable; Redmi 14C larger, traditional slab design.
Weight189g211gRazr 50 Ultra noticeably lighter.
FoldableYesNoRazr offers a larger screen in a smaller form factor when folded.
BuildInformation not providedInformation not providedBuild quality and materials can significantly impact durability and feel; this information is missing.
Display
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDIPS LCDRazr 50 Ultra: superior contrast, deeper blacks, power efficiency; Redmi 14C: wider viewing angles potentially, but less vibrant colors.
Size6.9"6.88"Negligible size difference in unfolded state.
Resolution1080 x 2640720 x 1640Razr 50 Ultra significantly sharper (413 ppi vs 260 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate165Hz120HzRazr 50 Ultra smoother animations, especially noticeable in gaming and scrolling.
Peak Brightness3000 nits600 nits (HBM)Razr 50 Ultra dramatically brighter, excellent outdoor visibility; Redmi 14C may struggle in bright sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)MediaTek Helio G81 UltraRazr 50 Ultra significantly more powerful, enabling demanding gaming, multitasking, and faster app loading.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Razr 50 Ultra's CPU offers superior performance across the board.
GPUAdreno 735Mali-G52 MC2Razr 50 Ultra provides a much better gaming and graphics-intensive task experience.
RAM/Storage12GB/256GB6GB/128GB or 8GB/128GBRazr 50 Ultra offers more RAM for smoother multitasking and larger storage for apps and files.
Camera
Rear CameraInformation not providedInformation not providedCamera quality is a crucial factor for many users; this information is missing.
VideoUp to 4K@960fps (HDR, EIS)1080p@30fpsRazr 50 Ultra offers vastly superior video recording capabilities with higher resolution, frame rates, and HDR.
Battery
Capacity4000 mAh5160 mAhRedmi 14C has significantly larger battery capacity, potentially longer battery life. However, Razr's more efficient display may offset this difference.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: Superior chipset, CPU, and GPU for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Folding Design: Offers a large screen in a compact, pocketable form factor.
  • Brighter and Higher Quality Display: Superior brightness, resolution, refresh rate, and color accuracy.
  • Superior Video Recording: Significantly better resolution, frame rates, and features.

Xiaomi Redmi 14C Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life, although real-world usage will depend on various factors.
  • Lower Price (Inferred): While not explicitly stated, Redmi devices are generally more budget-friendly.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: Users who prioritize portability, cutting-edge technology, a premium display, strong performance, and are willing to pay a premium for a foldable device. Ideal for professionals, content creators, and tech enthusiasts.

Xiaomi Redmi 14C: Budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and basic smartphone functionality. Suitable for casual users primarily focused on communication, social media, and light web browsing.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Budget: How much are you willing to spend?
  2. Form Factor: Do you prioritize portability and a foldable design or a traditional smartphone?
  3. Performance Needs: Do you require high performance for gaming, multitasking, or demanding applications?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Needs: Redmi 14C
  • Prioritize Performance and Latest Technology: Razr 50 Ultra
  • Value Portability and Innovation: Razr 50 Ultra
  • Heavy Media Consumption and Gaming: Razr 50 Ultra
  • Long Battery Life is Crucial: Redmi 14C (but real-world testing is needed to confirm)
Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.