Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Xiaomi Mix Flip - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 25, 2024 July 19, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 90.05 cm³ 94.2 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.65 "/g 3.61 "/g
Weight 189 g 190 g
Height 171.4 mm 167.5 mm
Width 74 mm 74 mm
Thickness 7.1 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design Yes Yes
Available Colors
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)
  • Black
  • White
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.86 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1224 x 2912
Aspect Ratio 22:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 87.5 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 460 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 3000 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 84.02 mAh/in² 101.57 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.42 mAh/cm³ 50.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4000 mAh 4780 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 735 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 50 UltraXiaomi Mix FlipPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mm167.5 x 74 x 7.6 mmThe Mix Flip is slightly shorter and thicker when folded. The Razr 50 Ultra is marginally thinner. These differences are minimal in practical use.
Weight189g190gThe weight difference is negligible (1g).
FoldableYesYesBoth offer the flexibility and portability of a foldable design.
Display
Size6.9"6.86"Negligible size difference in real-world usage.
TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDBoth offer excellent color accuracy, power efficiency, and high contrast.
Resolution1080 x 26401224 x 2912The Mix Flip has a sharper display (460 ppi vs 413 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate165Hz120HzThe Razr 50 Ultra's higher refresh rate provides smoother animations and scrolling, especially noticeable in gaming and fast-paced content.
Peak Brightness3000 nits3000 nitsBoth offer excellent outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8s Gen 3Snapdragon 8 Gen 3The Mix Flip's Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers a noticeable performance advantage over the 8s Gen 3 in the Razr, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)The Mix Flip has a faster and more powerful CPU configuration.
GPUAdreno 735Adreno 750The Mix Flip's Adreno 750 offers superior graphics performance, beneficial for demanding games and graphic-intensive tasks.
RAM12GB12GBBoth phones offer ample RAM for smooth multitasking.
Storage256GB512GBThe Mix Flip offers double the storage capacity, allowing users to store more apps, photos, and videos.
Battery
Capacity4000 mAh4780 mAhThe Mix Flip boasts significantly longer battery life due to its larger battery capacity.
Camera
Video CapabilitiesUp to 1080p @ 960fpsUp to 720p @ 1920fpsBoth offer extensive video recording options. The Mix Flip allows for higher resolution at lower frame rates (8K), and higher frame rate slow-motion at 720p. Specific sensor details are missing to make a complete comparison.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Advantages:

  • Smoother Display: The 165Hz refresh rate provides a more fluid user experience.
  • Potentially More Affordable: Positioned in the "medium price" range.

Xiaomi Mix Flip Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and Adreno 750 deliver significantly better performance.
  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution results in crisper visuals.
  • Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity translates to extended usage time.
  • Larger Storage Capacity: 512GB offers ample space for files and media.

Trade-offs:

  • Razr 50 Ultra: Sacrifices performance and battery life for a smoother display and potentially lower price.
  • Mix Flip: Higher price point for increased performance, battery life, and storage.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: Suitable for users who prioritize a smooth display experience and value affordability over top-tier performance. Ideal for everyday tasks, social media, and casual gaming.

Xiaomi Mix Flip: Best suited for power users who demand top-notch performance, long battery life, and ample storage. Ideal for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, and multitasking.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Mix Flip is in a higher price bracket.
  2. What are your performance needs? For demanding tasks, the Mix Flip is significantly better.
  3. How important is battery life? The Mix Flip offers longer battery life.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Moderate Use: Razr 50 Ultra
  • Demanding User, Prioritizes Performance and Battery: Mix Flip
  • Values Smooth Display Above All Else: Razr 50 Ultra (but consider performance trade-offs)
Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.