Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Motorola Razr 50 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola

General

Launch Date June 25, 2024 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 90.05 cm³ 92.54 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.65 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 189 g 188.4 g
Height 171.4 mm 171.3 mm
Width 74 mm 74 mm
Thickness 7.1 mm 7.3 mm
Foldable Design Yes Yes
Available Colors
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)
  • Koala Grey (Steel Wool)
  • Beach Sand (Pumice Stone)
  • Spritz Orange (Arabesque)

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 22:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 3000 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 84.02 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.42 mAh/cm³ 45.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 735 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs. Motorola Razr 50: A Detailed Comparison

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 50 UltraMotorola Razr 50Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mm171.3 x 74 x 7.3 mmVirtually identical in size and hand feel.
Weight189g188.4gNegligible weight difference.
FoldableYesYesBoth offer the flexibility and portability of a foldable design.
Display
Size6.9"6.9"Same screen real estate on both devices.
TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDBoth feature high-quality, power-efficient displays with vibrant colors.
Resolution1080 x 26401080 x 2640Identical resolution, resulting in similar sharpness.
Refresh Rate165Hz120HzThe Ultra's 165Hz refresh rate delivers noticeably smoother animations and scrolling, especially beneficial for gaming and fast-paced content.
Peak Brightness3000 nits3000 nitsBoth screens offer excellent outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 3MediaTek Dimensity 7300XThe Snapdragon 8+ Gen 3 in the Ultra provides significantly better performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)The Ultra's CPU offers superior processing power and multi-tasking capabilities.
GPUAdreno 735Mali-G615 MC2The Ultra's Adreno 735 GPU offers a significant advantage in graphics performance for gaming and visually intensive applications.
RAM12GB12GBBoth phones offer ample RAM for smooth multitasking.
Storage256GB512GBThe Razr 50 offers double the storage capacity, beneficial for users who store large amounts of media.
Battery
Capacity4000mAh4200mAhThe Razr 50 has a slightly larger battery, potentially offering longer battery life; however, real-world usage will vary based on usage patterns and the Ultra's more efficient chipset.
CameraNo detailed camera specifications were provided for comparison.
Software
OSAndroid 14Android 14Both run the latest Android version, offering similar features and functionalities.
OS UpdatesUp to Android 17UnspecifiedThe Ultra has confirmed longer-term software support, ensuring security updates and new features for a longer period.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Advantages:

  • Significantly faster performance: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 3 offers a substantial performance advantage for demanding tasks, gaming, and multitasking.
  • Smoother Display: The 165Hz refresh rate delivers a more fluid and responsive user experience.
  • Longer Software Support: Guaranteed updates up to Android 17 ensure long-term security and access to new features.
  • Superior Video Recording Capabilities: Offers more advanced video recording options with higher frame rates and resolutions.

Motorola Razr 50 Advantages:

  • Larger Storage Capacity: 512GB provides ample space for storing photos, videos, and applications.
  • Slightly Larger Battery: Potentially offers slightly longer battery life, though real-world performance depends on various factors.

Trade-offs:

  • The Razr 50 sacrifices performance and features for a lower price point and larger storage.
  • The Razr 50 Ultra has less storage but offers significantly improved performance and a smoother display.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a smooth display, the latest features, and long-term software support. Suitable for demanding tasks, gaming, and content creation.

Motorola Razr 50: Best suited for users who prioritize affordability and ample storage. A good choice for everyday tasks, social media, and light gaming, but less ideal for demanding applications.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Razr 50 is likely more affordable.
  2. What are your performance needs? Power users should opt for the Razr 50 Ultra.
  3. How important is long-term software support? The Ultra's guaranteed updates provide peace of mind.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Gamer: Razr 50 Ultra for its superior performance and higher refresh rate display.
  • Casual User: Razr 50 for its affordability and ample storage.
  • Future-Proofing: Razr 50 Ultra for its confirmed software update path.
  • Storage Focused User: Razr 50 for its larger internal storage.
Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.