Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Google Pixel 9 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 25, 2024 September 9, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 90.05 cm³ 93.51 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.65 "/g 3.17 "/g
Weight 189 g 199 g
Height 171.4 mm 152.8 mm
Width 74 mm 72 mm
Thickness 7.1 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Spring Green (Dill)
  • Midnight Blue (Navy Blazer)
  • Obsidian
  • Hazel
  • Porcelain
  • Rose Quartz

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.3 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1280 x 2856
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 86.9 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 495 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 2000 nits
Peak Brightness 3000 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 84.02 mAh/in² 118.42 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.42 mAh/cm³ 50.26 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4000 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 735 Mali-G715 MC7

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 17 21

Comparison Summary

Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 9 Pro: A Foldable Face-off

The smartphone landscape is constantly evolving, and 2024 brings us two compelling contenders: the foldable Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the powerhouse Google Pixel 9 Pro. As a tech journalist with an engineering background, I'll dissect these devices, translating their specs into real-world implications to help you choose the right phone.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Design
FeatureMotorola Razr 50 UltraGoogle Pixel 9 ProReal-World Implications
Form FactorFoldableSlabRazr offers pocket portability, Pixel a classic feel
Dimensions171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mm152.8 x 72 x 8.5 mmRazr is more compact when folded, Pixel thinner when unfolded
Weight189g199gNegligible weight difference in daily use
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedDurability and premium feel are unknown without further details
Display
FeatureMotorola Razr 50 UltraGoogle Pixel 9 ProReal-World Implications
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDLTPO OLEDRazr's foldable screen offers unique flexibility and a larger cover display; Pixel boasts a traditional, robust screen
Size6.9"6.3"Razr provides more screen real estate when unfolded; Pixel is a more manageable one-handed size
Resolution1080 x 26401280 x 2856Pixel has a slightly sharper display due to higher pixel density (495 ppi vs 413 ppi)
Refresh Rate165Hz120HzRazr offers potentially smoother scrolling and animations; both are excellent for gaming and media consumption
Peak Brightness3000 nits3000 nitsBoth excel in outdoor visibility
Performance
FeatureMotorola Razr 50 UltraGoogle Pixel 9 ProReal-World Implications
ChipsetSnapdragon 8s Gen 3Google Tensor G4Both are high-end chipsets, but Tensor G4 is likely optimized for AI and machine learning tasks specific to the Pixel
CPUOcta-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)Comparable CPU performance expected in everyday tasks; benchmarks will reveal detailed differences
GPUAdreno 735Mali-G715 MC7Adreno 735 generally offers stronger gaming performance
RAM12GB16GBPixel's larger RAM allows for more efficient multitasking and app switching
Storage256GB256GB, 512GB, 1TBPixel offers more storage options for users with large media libraries
Battery Life
FeatureMotorola Razr 50 UltraGoogle Pixel 9 ProReal-World Implications
Capacity4000 mAh4700 mAhPixel likely offers longer battery life due to larger capacity and potential software optimizations

(Note: Camera specifications are missing, preventing a detailed comparison in this category.)

2. Key Insights

  • Form Factor is Fundamental: The Razr's foldable design is its defining feature, offering unmatched portability. However, the Pixel's traditional slab design might feel more robust and familiar to some.
  • Performance Parity: Both phones pack powerful processors. The Snapdragon in the Razr might edge out the Tensor G4 in raw graphical power, but the Tensor G4's AI capabilities could provide a unique advantage in areas like photography and voice assistance.
  • Pixel's Powerhouse Battery: The Pixel 9 Pro's larger battery likely translates to significantly longer usage time between charges. This is crucial for power users.
  • Software Experience: Pixel phones generally receive faster and longer Android updates, a major consideration for users prioritizing the latest features and security patches.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Razr 50 Ultra: Ideal for trendsetters and users who prioritize portability and a unique device. The larger cover screen enhances usability even when folded.
  • Pixel 9 Pro: Best suited for users seeking a powerful, reliable phone with a strong emphasis on camera performance (assuming Pixel maintains its camera leadership), software updates, and long battery life.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • Do you prioritize portability above all else? If so, the Razr's compact folded size is a compelling advantage.
  • How important is long battery life? The Pixel 9 Pro's larger battery is a clear winner in this regard.
  • Are you drawn to the latest innovations and a unique user experience? The Razr's foldable design offers a glimpse into the future of smartphones. If you prefer a more established and refined experience, the Pixel 9 Pro is a solid choice.
Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.