Motorola Razr 40 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date June 21, 2023 January 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 93.53 cm³ 96.66 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.55 "/g
Weight 188.6 g 188 g
Height 170.8 mm 161.1 mm
Width 74 mm 75 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom
  • Midnight Black
  • Forest Green
  • Lavender Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 88.9 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 1300 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 88.22 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.91 mAh/cm³ 51.73 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4200 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Helio G99 Ultra
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 644 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4GPractical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldableStandardRazr 40 offers portability and a unique form factor, Redmi Note 13 Pro offers a traditional, larger screen experience.
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7.4 (folded)161.1 x 75 x 8Razr 40 is significantly more compact when folded, easier for pocket carry. Redmi Note 13 Pro is thinner when unfolded.
Weight (g)188.6188Nearly identical weight, despite foldable design of the Razr 40.
Display
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDAMOLEDRazr 40's foldable screen allows for a larger display in a smaller device; potential for crease visibility. Redmi Note 13 Pro has a standard, potentially more durable screen.
Size (inches)6.96.67Similar screen sizes when unfolded, but Razr 40 offers a smaller external display for quick interactions.
Resolution1080 x 26401080 x 2400Comparable sharpness; Razr 40 slightly taller aspect ratio.
Refresh Rate (Hz)144120Razr 40 offers smoother scrolling and animations; potentially impacts battery life more.
Peak Brightness (nits)14001300Both offer good outdoor visibility, Razr 40 slightly brighter.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1MediaTek Helio G99 UltraSnapdragon 7 Gen 1 generally offers better performance in benchmarks, but real-world differences might be less noticeable for average users.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz A710 & 3x2.36 GHz A710 & 4x1.8 GHz A510)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz A76 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Different core configurations; both should handle daily tasks well, but Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 likely performs better in demanding applications.
GPUAdreno 644Mali-G57 MC2Adreno 644 generally considered more powerful; noticeable in gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM (GB)88/12Redmi Note 13 Pro offers a 12GB RAM option for better multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)64200Redmi Note 13 Pro has a significantly higher resolution main sensor; potentially better detail and low-light performance. Need to consider sensor size and processing for true comparison.
Ultrawide (MP)138Razr 40 has a slightly higher resolution ultrawide.
Other Cameras32MP Selfie2MP Depth, 16MP SelfieRedmi Note 13 Pro adds a dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode.
Video Recording4K@30fps with EIS1080p@60fpsRazr 40 can record higher resolution video, but Redmi Note 13 Pro offers higher frame rates at 1080p.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)42005000Redmi Note 13 Pro offers significantly longer battery life. Razr 40's smaller battery is a trade-off for the foldable design.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Advantages:

  • Portability: Foldable design offers unmatched portability.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother user experience.
  • Potentially Better GPU: Advantage in gaming and graphic tasks.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G Advantages:

  • Longer Battery Life: Significantly larger battery capacity.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: Potential for better image quality.
  • More RAM Options: 12GB variant available for power users.
  • Lower Price: Generally more affordable.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40: Users who prioritize portability and a unique, stylish device. Ideal for those who value pocketability over battery life and are willing to pay a premium for the foldable form factor.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G: Users who prioritize battery life, camera performance, and value. Ideal for those seeking a well-rounded phone with a large screen and long-lasting battery without breaking the bank. Suitable for heavy users and mobile photographers.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. How important is portability? Foldable design is a major factor.
  2. What is your budget? Razr 40 is generally more expensive.
  3. What are your primary use cases? (e.g., social media, gaming, photography)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy user needing long battery life: Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G.
  • Style-conscious user who values portability above all else: Razr 40.
  • Gamer on a budget: Consider the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G due to price, but research real-world gaming performance comparisons.

My Choice: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G

While the Razr 40 is undeniably cool with its foldable design, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G offers a more practical package for my needs. The significantly larger battery, higher-resolution main camera, and lower price are compelling advantages. I prioritize battery life and camera quality, and I'm not willing to compromise on these for the sake of portability. The Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G seems to strike a better balance between features, performance, and price. The availability of a 12GB RAM option is also attractive for future-proofing the device. I am willing to give up the slightly faster refresh rate and potentially more powerful GPU for the significantly larger battery and more versatile camera system.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.