Motorola Razr 40 vs Xiaomi Mix Flip - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date June 21, 2023 July 19, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 93.53 cm³ 94.2 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.61 "/g
Weight 188.6 g 190 g
Height 170.8 mm 167.5 mm
Width 74 mm 74 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 7.6 mm
Foldable Design Yes Yes
Available Colors
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom
  • Black
  • White
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.86 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1224 x 2912
Aspect Ratio 22:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 87.5 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 460 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 88.22 mAh/in² 101.57 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.91 mAh/cm³ 50.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4200 mAh 4780 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 644 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40Xiaomi Mix FlipPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7.4167.5 x 74 x 7.6Razr 40 is slightly taller but thinner when folded. Negligible difference in daily use.
Weight (g)188.6190Virtually identical weight; insignificant difference in hand.
FoldableYesYesBoth offer the flexibility and portability of a foldable design.
Display
Size (inches)6.96.86Negligible size difference.
Resolution (pixels)1080 x 26401224 x 2912Mix Flip has a noticeably sharper display due to higher resolution, resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)144120Razr 40 offers smoother animations and scrolling, especially noticeable in games and fast-paced content.
Peak Brightness (nits)14003000Mix Flip offers significantly better outdoor visibility in bright sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Mix Flip boasts significantly faster processing speeds and graphics performance thanks to the flagship 8 Gen 3 chip. This translates to smoother multitasking, quicker app loading, and better gaming capabilities.
RAM (GB)812Mix Flip offers more headroom for multitasking and demanding applications, making it less prone to slowdowns.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450While Razr 40 has higher megapixel count, Mix Flip uses a larger sensor (1/1.55") and wider aperture (f/1.7) potentially capturing more light and detail, especially in low light. Real-world image quality depends on image processing.
TelephotoNoYes (60MP)Mix Flip offers optical zoom capabilities for capturing distant subjects, a clear advantage.
Video4K@30fps8K@24fpsMix Flip can record higher resolution video. Practical benefit depends on user's need for 8K recording and display capabilities.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)42004780Mix Flip has a larger battery, likely resulting in longer battery life. Actual usage time depends on various factors.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Advantages:

  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother scrolling and animations.
  • Lower Price: Offers a more affordable foldable phone option.

Xiaomi Mix Flip Advantages:

  • Significantly More Powerful: Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers vastly superior performance.
  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution for crisper visuals.
  • Brighter Display: Excellent outdoor visibility.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • Telephoto Lens: Optical zoom capability for versatile photography.
  • Higher Resolution Video Recording: Up to 8K video.

Trade-offs:

  • Razr 40: Compromises on performance and camera features for a lower price.
  • Mix Flip: Significantly more expensive.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40:

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize portability and a smooth display experience for everyday tasks like social media and web browsing.
  • Use Cases: Casual photography, social media, web browsing, light gaming.

Xiaomi Mix Flip:

  • Ideal User: Users who demand top-tier performance, excellent camera capabilities, and a vibrant display for demanding tasks and multimedia consumption. Price is less of a concern.
  • Use Cases: Demanding gaming, professional photography/videography, content creation, multitasking.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Razr 40 offers a significant price advantage.
  2. What level of performance do you need? For demanding tasks, the Mix Flip is a clear winner.
  3. How important are camera features? The Mix Flip offers a more versatile camera system with a telephoto lens.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget: Motorola Razr 40
  • Prioritize Performance and Camera: Xiaomi Mix Flip

My Choice: Xiaomi Mix Flip

While significantly more expensive, the Xiaomi Mix Flip offers a compelling package that justifies the premium. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 delivers a substantial performance leap crucial for a smooth and future-proof experience. The brighter, sharper display enhances multimedia consumption, and the inclusion of a telephoto lens significantly elevates the camera system's versatility. The larger battery also addresses a common concern with foldable phones. While the Razr 40 offers a good entry point into the foldable market, the Mix Flip's superior performance, display, and camera make it the better overall device for my needs. I prioritize long-term performance and a premium user experience over a lower initial price.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.