Motorola Razr 40 vs Xiaomi 14T Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date June 21, 2023 September 26, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 93.53 cm³ 101.19 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.19 "/g
Weight 188.6 g 209 g
Height 170.8 mm 160.4 mm
Width 74 mm 75.1 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom
  • Titan Black
  • Titan Gray
  • Titan Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 89.1 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1600 nits
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 88.22 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.91 mAh/cm³ 49.41 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4200 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
GPU Adreno 644 Immortalis-G720 MC12

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40Xiaomi 14T ProPractical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldableSlabRazr 40 offers portability and a smaller footprint when closed, but potentially compromised durability due to the hinge. 14T Pro is more traditional and likely more robust.
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7.4160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4Razr 40 is significantly more compact when folded. 14T Pro is larger but thinner when unfolded.
Weight (g)188.6209Razr 40 is noticeably lighter.
Display
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDAMOLEDRazr 40's folding display allows for a large screen in a compact device. 14T Pro offers a traditional, potentially more durable screen.
Size (inches)6.96.67Comparable screen real estate when unfolded.
Resolution1080 x 26401220 x 271214T Pro has a slightly sharper display due to higher resolution.
Refresh Rate (Hz)144144Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)1400400014T Pro offers significantly better outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1Dimensity 9300+9300+ boasts superior performance in benchmarks and demanding tasks.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz A710 & 3x2.36 GHz A710 & 4x1.8 GHz A510)Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz X4 & 3x2.85 GHz X4 & 4x2.0 GHz A720)14T Pro's CPU offers significantly faster processing speeds and improved multi-tasking.
GPUAdreno 644Immortalis-G720 MC1214T Pro's GPU offers better gaming and graphics performance.
RAM (GB)81214T Pro offers more RAM for smoother multitasking and app switching.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450While Razr has higher MP count, 14T Pro features a larger 1/1.31\" sensor, potentially capturing more light and detail.
Ultrawide (MP)1312Comparable ultrawide capabilities.
Telephoto (MP)N/A5014T Pro offers optical zoom capabilities missing on the Razr 40.
Video Recording4K@30fps8K@30fps14T Pro offers higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)4200500014T Pro offers significantly longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Advantages:

  • Portability: The foldable design makes it incredibly compact when closed.
  • Lighter Weight: Noticeably lighter than the 14T Pro.
  • Unique Form Factor: Offers a distinctive, nostalgic design.

Xiaomi 14T Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly more powerful CPU and GPU for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Better Display: Brighter, sharper, and supports Dolby Vision.
  • Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity for extended usage.
  • Enhanced Camera System: Offers a telephoto lens for optical zoom, 8K video recording, and a larger main sensor.

Trade-offs:

  • Razr 40 sacrifices performance and battery life for portability and unique design.
  • 14T Pro prioritizes performance and features over ultimate portability.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40: Ideal for users who prioritize portability and style above all else. Suitable for light usage, social media, and casual photography.

Xiaomi 14T Pro: Best suited for power users, gamers, photography enthusiasts, and those who demand long battery life.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is portability? If ultimate pocketability is paramount, the Razr 40 is the clear winner.
  2. What is your primary phone usage? For demanding tasks, gaming, and media consumption, the 14T Pro is superior.
  3. What is your budget? Both are in the mid-range, but specific pricing should be compared.

My Choice: Xiaomi 14T Pro

While the Razr 40's foldable design is intriguing, the Xiaomi 14T Pro offers a more well-rounded package for my needs. I prioritize performance, battery life, and camera quality. The 14T Pro's superior processor, brighter display, larger battery, and more versatile camera system make it a clear winner for me. The significantly improved performance and camera capabilities outweigh the portability advantage of the Razr 40. Although I appreciate the Razr's unique form factor, the 14T Pro's traditional slab design offers greater peace of mind regarding durability.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.