Motorola Razr 40 vs Xiaomi 14 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date June 21, 2023 February 22, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 93.53 cm³ 111.81 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 2.93 "/g
Weight 188.6 g 229.5 g
Height 170.8 mm 161.4 mm
Width 74 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 9.2 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom
  • Titanium Gray
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.73 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1440 x 3200
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 90 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 522 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 1000 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 88.22 mAh/in² 110.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.91 mAh/cm³ 44.72 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4200 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 644 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2, Gen 2, OTG, DisplayPort

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40Xiaomi 14 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldableStandardRazr 40 offers portability and a unique form factor; Xiaomi 14 Ultra provides a traditional smartphone experience.
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7.4161.4 x 75.3 x 9.2Razr 40 is significantly more compact when folded but thicker when unfolded. Xiaomi 14 Ultra is larger overall.
Weight (g)188.6229.5Razr 40 is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use and portability, especially when folded.
Display
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLEDBoth offer excellent color accuracy and contrast, but Razr 40's folding capability introduces a crease and potential durability concerns.
Size (inches)6.96.73Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 26401440 x 3200Xiaomi 14 Ultra boasts a sharper display with higher pixel density, resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)144120Razr 40 offers smoother animations and scrolling; however, the difference might not be perceptible to all users.
Peak Brightness (nits)14003000Xiaomi 14 Ultra's significantly higher peak brightness ensures exceptional outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Xiaomi 14 Ultra's 8 Gen 3 provides significantly faster processing speeds, benefiting demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (up to 2.4 GHz)Octa-core (up to 3.3 GHz)Xiaomi 14 Ultra offers superior multi-core performance, leading to faster app loading and smoother multitasking.
RAM (GB)816Double the RAM on the Xiaomi 14 Ultra allows for more apps to run in the background without performance degradation.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450 (1-inch sensor)Xiaomi 14 Ultra's larger sensor captures more light, resulting in better low-light performance and potentially improved dynamic range.
Camera FeaturesOIS, EISLeica Optics, variable aperture, OIS, EIS, 8K videoXiaomi 14 Ultra provides more advanced camera features, including higher resolution video recording and Leica-tuned optics for potentially superior image quality.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)42005000Xiaomi 14 Ultra's larger battery capacity likely translates to longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Advantages:

  • Portability: The foldable design offers unmatched portability.
  • Lighter Weight: Noticeably lighter than the Xiaomi 14 Ultra.
  • Higher Refresh Rate: Smoother scrolling and animations.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor and more RAM.
  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution and significantly brighter screen.
  • Advanced Camera System: Larger sensor, Leica optics, and 8K video recording.
  • Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity.

Trade-offs:

  • Razr 40: Foldable design compromises durability and screen real estate when unfolded. Lower performance compared to Xiaomi 14 Ultra.
  • Xiaomi 14 Ultra: Larger and heavier than the Razr 40. Less portable.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40: Ideal for users who prioritize portability and a unique form factor over raw performance. Suitable for social media, light productivity, and casual content consumption.

Xiaomi 14 Ultra: Ideal for power users, photographers, and videographers who demand top-tier performance, a stunning display, and an advanced camera system. Suitable for demanding gaming, professional content creation, and heavy multitasking.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Portability vs. Performance: Which is more important: a compact, pocketable phone or a powerful device with a larger screen?
  2. Camera Needs: Do you require professional-grade camera features and image quality, or is a standard camera setup sufficient?
  3. Budget: The Xiaomi 14 Ultra is expected to be more expensive. Does the price difference justify the added features?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Frequent Traveler: Razr 40 for its compact size and portability.
  • Mobile Gamer/Power User: Xiaomi 14 Ultra for its superior performance and display.
  • Photography Enthusiast: Xiaomi 14 Ultra for its advanced camera system.

My Choice: Xiaomi 14 Ultra

While I appreciate the innovative design and portability of the Razr 40, the Xiaomi 14 Ultra is the better overall phone for my needs. The significantly improved performance, superior camera system, brighter and sharper display, and longer battery life are compelling advantages. The trade-off in size and weight is acceptable given the substantial gains in functionality. I prioritize a smooth and powerful user experience, along with high-quality photography capabilities, making the Xiaomi 14 Ultra the clear winner for me. While the Razr 40's form factor is unique, the performance limitations of the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 would be a significant drawback for my usage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.