Motorola Razr 40 vs Sony Xperia 5 V - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date June 21, 2023 September 25, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 93.53 cm³ 90.06 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.35 "/g
Weight 188.6 g 182 g
Height 170.8 mm 154 mm
Width 74 mm 68 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Platinum Silver

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.1 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1080 x 2520
Aspect Ratio 22:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 83 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 449 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 88.22 mAh/in² 134.37 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.91 mAh/cm³ 55.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4200 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 644 Adreno 740

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40Sony Xperia 5 VPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7.4 (folded)154 x 68 x 8.6Razr 40 significantly more compact when folded, pocketable; Xperia 5 V traditional candybar design.
Weight (g)188.6182Negligible weight difference in practical use.
FoldableYesNoRazr 40 offers a larger screen in a smaller form factor when folded; Xperia 5 V offers a more durable, traditional design.
Display
Size (inches)6.96.1Razr 40 offers a larger main display for media consumption; Xperia 5 V is more one-hand friendly.
Resolution (pixels)1080 x 26401080 x 2520Similar pixel density, sharpness comparable; Razr 40's taller aspect ratio better for scrolling.
Refresh Rate (Hz)144120Razr 40 may offer slightly smoother animations and scrolling, but the difference is minimal in real-world use.
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDOLEDRazr 40's foldable display allows for unique use cases like Flex View; Xperia 5 V's traditional OLED offers potentially better durability.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Xperia 5 V has a significantly more powerful chipset, resulting in noticeably better performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)Xperia 5 V's CPU offers superior processing power across the board.
GPUAdreno 644Adreno 740Xperia 5 V's GPU provides a substantial advantage in graphics performance for gaming and visually intensive applications.
RAM (GB)88Equal RAM; multitasking performance will likely be bottlenecked by the Razr 40's weaker processor.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6448While Razr 40 has a higher megapixel count, Xperia 5 V uses a larger sensor (1/1.4") and advanced features for potentially superior image quality.
DXOMARK ScoreNot Available118Xperia 5 V's camera system is objectively rated as excellent. Razr 40's camera performance is unknown.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)42005000Xperia 5 V offers significantly longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Advantages:

  • Portability: Significantly more compact when folded.
  • Unique Form Factor: Foldable design with Flex View for unique use cases.
  • More Affordable: Generally priced lower than the Xperia 5 V.

Sony Xperia 5 V Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly more powerful processor and GPU for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity for extended use.
  • Excellent Camera: Proven high-quality camera system with advanced features.
  • More Durable Design: Traditional candybar design likely more resistant to wear and tear.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40: Ideal for users who prioritize portability and a unique form factor above all else. Suitable for light to moderate usage, social media, and casual photography. Excellent for those seeking a compact phone for easy pocket carry.

Sony Xperia 5 V: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, battery life, and camera quality. Suitable for demanding tasks, mobile gaming, photography enthusiasts, and power users.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is portability and a foldable design?
  2. What is your typical smartphone usage (light, moderate, heavy)?
  3. What is your budget?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Prioritize Portability and Style: Choose the Razr 40.
  • Prioritize Performance, Battery, and Camera: Choose the Xperia 5 V.
  • On a Tight Budget and Need a Compact Phone: Choose the Razr 40.

My Choice: Sony Xperia 5 V

While the Razr 40's foldable design is intriguing, the Xperia 5 V's superior performance, battery life, and camera system are more important to me. I value a smooth user experience for demanding tasks and gaming, and the Xperia 5 V delivers in those areas. The significantly longer battery life and excellent camera are also major factors in my decision. While the Razr 40's portability is attractive, I am willing to sacrifice some compactness for a more well-rounded and powerful device. The confirmed excellent camera quality of the Xperia 5 V further solidifies my choice.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.