Motorola Razr 40 vs Realme 11 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola
Realme 11
Realme 11
Realme

General

Launch Date June 21, 2023 July 31, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 93.53 cm³ 102 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.54 "/g
Weight 188.6 g 190 g
Height 170.8 mm 165.7 mm
Width 74 mm 76 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom
  • Midnight Black (Glory Black)
  • Sunrise Gold (Glory Gold)

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.72 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 86.6 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 392 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 550 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 680 nits
Peak Brightness 1400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 88.22 mAh/in² 110.72 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.91 mAh/cm³ 49.02 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4200 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 644 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40Realme 11Practical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldableStandardRazr 40 offers portability and a unique form factor, potentially sacrificing durability. Realme 11 is a traditional slab phone.
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7.4165.7 x 76 x 8.1Razr 40 is significantly thinner when folded but slightly taller unfolded. Realme 11 is wider and thicker overall.
Weight (g)188.6190Negligible weight difference; both feel relatively light in hand.
Display
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDIPS LCDRazr 40's AMOLED offers deeper blacks, better contrast, and potentially lower power consumption with LTPO. Realme 11's IPS LCD has wider viewing angles.
Display Size (inches)6.96.72Similar screen real estate; Razr 40's taller aspect ratio may be better for reading, Realme 11's wider aspect ratio for media consumption.
Resolution1080 x 26401080 x 2400Razr 40's sharper display due to higher pixel density.
Refresh Rate (Hz)144120Razr 40 offers smoother scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)1400680Razr 40 is significantly brighter, improving outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1Dimensity 6100+Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 generally offers better performance, particularly in GPU tasks.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz...)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz...)Both are octa-core, but Snapdragon 7 Gen 1's architecture and clock speeds likely result in superior performance.
RAM (GB)88Same RAM capacity, sufficient for multitasking on both devices.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)64100Realme 11 boasts a higher resolution main sensor, but image quality depends on various factors beyond megapixel count (sensor size, processing).
Video Recording4K@30fps1080p@30fpsRazr 40 offers superior video resolution.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)42005000Realme 11 has a significantly larger battery, likely translating to longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Unique form factor for portability.
  • Superior Display: AMOLED with higher refresh rate and peak brightness.
  • Better Performance: More powerful chipset (Snapdragon 7 Gen 1).
  • Higher Resolution Video Recording: 4K@30fps.

Realme 11 Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: Potentially much longer battery life.
  • Lower Price: Generally more affordable.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: 100MP sensor. (Note: Higher resolution doesn't guarantee better image quality.)
  • Potentially More Durable: Traditional slab design generally more robust than foldable designs.

Trade-offs:

  • Razr 40 sacrifices battery life and durability for its foldable design and superior display/performance.
  • Realme 11 prioritizes battery life and affordability over cutting-edge performance and display technology.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40: Users who value portability, a unique design, and a premium multimedia experience. Ideal for those who prioritize style and are willing to compromise on battery life.

Realme 11: Users seeking a long-lasting battery, affordability, and a decent overall experience. Suitable for those who prioritize practicality and value for money.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. How important is portability and a unique design?
  2. What is your budget?
  3. What are your priorities: battery life, performance, display quality, or camera?

Scenario-based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Battery Life is Crucial: Realme 11
  • Style Conscious, Value Portability: Motorola Razr 40
  • Power User, Needs Top Performance: Motorola Razr 40

My Choice: Motorola Razr 40

While the Realme 11 offers a compelling value proposition with its large battery and lower price, I would choose the Motorola Razr 40. The foldable design significantly appeals to me for its portability and uniqueness. I am willing to compromise slightly on battery life for the superior display quality (AMOLED, higher refresh rate, brightness), the more powerful processor, and the capability to record 4K video. The Razr 40 provides a more premium and enjoyable user experience for my needs, which outweigh the benefits of the Realme 11 in this case. I often prioritize having the latest technology and appreciate the innovative form factor.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.