Motorola Razr 40 vs Oppo Find N3 Flip - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date June 21, 2023 September 8, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 93.53 cm³ 98.38 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.43 "/g
Weight 188.6 g 198 g
Height 170.8 mm 166.4 mm
Width 74 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design Yes Yes
Available Colors
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom
  • Cream Gold
  • Misty Pink
  • Sleek Black

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.8 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1080 x 2520
Aspect Ratio 22:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 85.6 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 403 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 1600 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 88.22 mAh/in² 92.99 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.91 mAh/cm³ 43.71 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4200 mAh 4300 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 644 Immortalis-G715 MC11

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40Oppo Find N3 FlipPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7.4166.4 x 75.8 x 7.8Razr 40 slightly taller, N3 Flip slightly wider and thicker. Negligible difference in everyday use.
Weight (g)188.6198Razr 40 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
FoldableYesYesBoth offer foldable screen technology for portability and a larger screen in a smaller form factor.
Display
Size (inches)6.96.8Virtually identical screen real estate.
Resolution (pixels)1080 x 26401080 x 2520Razr 40 slightly taller aspect ratio. Minimal difference in sharpness.
Refresh Rate (Hz)144120Razr 40 offers smoother scrolling and animations, especially noticeable in gaming and fast-paced content.
Peak Brightness (nits)14001600N3 Flip offers better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1Dimensity 9200Dimensity 9200 significantly more powerful, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Dimensity 9200 boasts a more powerful CPU architecture, translating to a noticeable performance advantage.
RAM (GB)812More RAM in N3 Flip allows for more apps to run in the background without performance slowdowns.
GPUAdreno 644Immortalis-G715 MC11Immortalis-G715 significantly more powerful, providing a substantial advantage in gaming and graphically demanding tasks.
Camera
Rear Cameras64MP Main, 13MP Wide+Macro50MP Main, 48MP Wide+Macro, 32MP TelephotoN3 Flip offers a more versatile camera system with a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom. The larger sensor size on the N3 Flip's ultrawide likely provides superior low-light performance.
Selfie Camera32MP32MPSimilar resolution, practical image quality may vary depending on sensor and processing.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)42004300N3 Flip has a slightly larger battery, potentially offering slightly longer battery life. Real-world usage will depend on various factors.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Advantages:

  • Lighter: Noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother scrolling and animations.
  • Lower Price: Generally more affordable.

Oppo Find N3 Flip Advantages:

  • Significantly More Powerful: Dimensity 9200 provides a major performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Telephoto lens enables optical zoom, potentially larger ultrawide sensor.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • More RAM: Better multitasking capabilities.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40: Suitable for users who prioritize portability and affordability, value a smooth display, and primarily use their phone for everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and light gaming.

Oppo Find N3 Flip: Ideal for users who demand top-tier performance for gaming and demanding applications, require a versatile camera system with optical zoom, and are willing to pay a premium for these features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Razr 40 is a more budget-friendly option.
  2. What is your primary use case? For demanding tasks and gaming, the N3 Flip is superior. For everyday use, the Razr 40 is sufficient.
  3. How important is camera quality and versatility? The N3 Flip offers a more advanced camera system.

My Choice: Oppo Find N3 Flip

While the Motorola Razr 40 offers a compelling price point and a smooth display, the Oppo Find N3 Flip's significant performance advantage, more versatile camera system with a dedicated telephoto lens, and slightly larger battery make it the better overall device for my needs. I prioritize performance and camera quality, and I am willing to pay the premium for the N3 Flip's superior hardware. The Dimensity 9200 provides a future-proof platform for demanding applications and games, ensuring a smooth user experience for years to come. The addition of a telephoto lens expands creative possibilities for photography. While the Razr 40's lighter weight is appealing, the performance and camera benefits of the N3 Flip outweigh this advantage for me.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.