Motorola Razr 40 vs Motorola Edge 50 Neo - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date June 21, 2023 August 29, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 93.53 cm³ 88.87 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.74 "/g
Weight 188.6 g 171 g
Height 170.8 mm 154.1 mm
Width 74 mm 71.2 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom
  • Nautical Blue
  • Latte
  • Grisaille
  • Poinciana

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.4 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1256 x 2760
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 474 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 88.22 mAh/in² 105.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.91 mAh/cm³ 48.5 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4200 mAh 4310 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 644 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16 19

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40Motorola Edge 50 NeoPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7.4154.1 x 71.2 x 8.1Razr 40 is significantly more compact when folded, but thicker when unfolded. Edge 50 Neo is a traditional slab design.
Weight (g)188.6171Razr 40 is slightly heavier despite smaller size due to folding mechanism.
FoldableYesNoRazr 40 offers portability and a unique form factor, Edge 50 Neo provides a larger screen in a standard form.
Display
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDLTPO P-OLEDBoth offer excellent color accuracy and deep blacks. Razr 40's folding screen introduces a crease and potential durability concerns.
Size (inches)6.96.4Razr 40 has a larger main display for immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 26401256 x 2760Edge 50 Neo boasts a sharper display (higher pixel density) for crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)144120Razr 40 offers smoother scrolling and animations, though the difference might not be noticeable to all users.
Peak Brightness (nits)14003000Edge 50 Neo is significantly brighter, ensuring better visibility outdoors.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1MediaTek Dimensity 7300Both chipsets offer solid mid-range performance. Dimensity 7300 is newer and benchmarks indicate it might offer slightly better performance in certain areas, especially gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz A710 & 3x2.36 GHz A710 & 4x1.8 GHz A510)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55)Specific core configurations suggest Dimensity 7300 might offer improved multi-core performance. Real-world difference may vary.
GPUAdreno 644Mali-G615 MC2Both GPUs are capable of handling most games, but Adreno 644 generally has a wider developer support ecosystem.
RAM (GB)88/12Edge 50 Neo offers a 12GB RAM option, potentially improving multitasking and demanding application performance.
Camera
Rear Camera64MP Main + 13MP Wide/Macro50MP Main + 13MP Wide/Macro + 10MP TelephotoEdge 50 Neo offers a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom, providing greater versatility. Razr 40 lacks optical zoom.
Front Camera32MP32MPSimilar front camera specifications.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)42004310Edge 50 Neo has a slightly larger battery capacity. Actual battery life depends heavily on usage patterns.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Advantages:

  • Portability: The foldable design makes it incredibly compact when closed.
  • Unique Form Factor: The flip phone nostalgia and compact size appeal to a specific user base.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother scrolling and animations.

Motorola Edge 50 Neo Advantages:

  • Brighter Display: Superior outdoor visibility.
  • Sharper Display: Higher pixel density for crisper visuals.
  • Versatile Camera System: Dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom.
  • Slightly Larger Battery: Potential for longer battery life.
  • Potentially More Powerful Chipset: Newer Dimensity 7300 might offer better performance in some areas.
  • Higher RAM Option: 12GB variant available for improved multitasking.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40: Ideal for users who prioritize portability and a unique, compact design above all else. Suitable for those who value one-handed usability and pocket-friendliness.

Motorola Edge 50 Neo: Suitable for users seeking a well-rounded smartphone with a great display, versatile camera system, and solid performance. Good for multimedia consumption, gaming, and everyday tasks.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Form Factor Priority: Do you prioritize ultimate portability and a unique design (Razr 40) or a traditional slab phone with a larger screen (Edge 50 Neo)?
  2. Camera Needs: Is optical zoom important for your photography? If so, the Edge 50 Neo is the better choice.
  3. Budget & Feature Importance: Weigh the price difference against features like display brightness, camera versatility, and potential performance differences.

My Choice: Motorola Edge 50 Neo

While the Razr 40's foldable design is intriguing, the Edge 50 Neo offers a more well-rounded package for my needs. The brighter and sharper display, along with the versatile camera system with a telephoto lens, are significant advantages. The potentially superior performance of the Dimensity 7300 and the availability of a 12GB RAM option further solidify its appeal. Although I appreciate the Razr 40's compactness, I prioritize a larger, brighter screen for media consumption and a more versatile camera system for capturing memories. The Edge 50 Neo's slight battery advantage is also a welcome bonus.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.