Motorola Razr 40 vs Huawei Pura 70 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date June 21, 2023 April 29, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 93.53 cm³ 102.57 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.01 "/g
Weight 188.6 g 226 g
Height 170.8 mm 162.6 mm
Width 74 mm 75.1 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom
  • Black
  • White
  • Green
  • Brown

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.8 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1260 x 2844
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 90.5 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 460 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 2500 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 88.22 mAh/in² 112.46 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.91 mAh/cm³ 50.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4200 mAh 5200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Kirin 9010 (7 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Taishan Big & 3x2.18 GHz Taishan Mid & 4x1.55 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 644 8

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A 1.2
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.2

Software

Operating System Android N/A
Initial OS Version 13 N/A
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40Huawei Pura 70 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7.4162.6 x 75.1 x 8.4Razr 40 is significantly more compact when folded, but slightly taller unfolded due to its clamshell design. Pura 70 Ultra is a traditional slab phone.
Weight (g)188.6226Razr 40 is noticeably lighter and more pocketable.
FoldableYesNoRazr 40 offers portability advantages; Pura 70 Ultra offers a larger, uninterrupted screen.
Display
Display Size (inches)6.96.8Negligible size difference in unfolded state.
Resolution1080 x 26401260 x 2844Pura 70 Ultra has a sharper display with higher pixel density (460 ppi vs 413 ppi).
Refresh Rate (Hz)144120Razr 40 offers smoother animations and scrolling; however, the difference might not be noticeable for all users.
Peak Brightness (nits)14002500Pura 70 Ultra is significantly brighter, making it more usable in direct sunlight.
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDLTPO OLEDRazr 40's foldable display introduces a crease, potential durability concerns, and a smaller cover screen for quick interactions. Pura 70 Ultra's traditional OLED offers a seamless viewing experience.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm)Kirin 9010 (7nm)Kirin 9010 was a flagship chip when released, potentially offering better performance than the mid-range Snapdragon 7 Gen 1. However, without benchmark comparisons, a definitive performance assessment is challenging.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (specs unclear)Detailed comparison is limited by lack of specific clock speeds for the Pura's CPU cores.
RAM8GB16GBPura 70 Ultra has significantly more RAM, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera64MP50MP (Sony IMX989) with variable aperturePura 70 Ultra likely has superior image quality due to the larger sensor size (1") and variable aperture (f/1.6 - f/4.0). Razr 40 specs are less impressive.
Additional Cameras13MP Wide + Macro, 32MP Selfie40MP Wide, 50MP Telephoto, 13MP SelfiePura 70 Ultra boasts a more versatile camera system with a dedicated telephoto lens offering optical zoom.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)42005200Pura 70 Ultra offers longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Advantages:

  • Portability: Significantly more compact and pocketable due to its foldable design.
  • Higher Refresh Rate: Smoother scrolling and animations.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra Advantages:

  • Performance: Likely more powerful due to the flagship Kirin 9010 chipset and larger RAM.
  • Display: Brighter, sharper display with more vivid colors.
  • Camera: More versatile and higher quality camera system with a larger sensor, variable aperture, and telephoto lens.
  • Battery Life: Larger battery capacity.

Trade-offs:

  • Razr 40: Sacrifices performance, camera quality, and battery life for portability. Crease in the folding display.
  • Pura 70 Ultra: Larger and heavier, less pocketable.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40: Ideal for users who prioritize portability and style above all else. Suitable for light usage, social media, and casual photography.

Huawei Pura 70 Ultra: Best suited for power users, photographers, and videographers who demand top-tier performance, a stunning display, and a versatile camera system. Excellent for gaming, content creation, and multitasking.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Portability vs. Performance: Which is more important: a compact phone that fits easily in your pocket or a powerful phone with a larger screen and longer battery life?
  2. Camera Needs: Are you a casual photographer or do you require advanced features like optical zoom and a larger sensor?
  3. Budget: The Razr 40 falls in the medium price range while the Pura 70 Ultra is a high-end device.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Frequent Traveler: Razr 40 for its compact size.
  • Mobile Gamer/Power User: Pura 70 Ultra for its performance and battery.
  • Photography Enthusiast: Pura 70 Ultra for its superior camera system.

My Choice: Huawei Pura 70 Ultra

While I appreciate the innovative design and portability of the Razr 40, the Pura 70 Ultra's superior performance, camera system, brighter display, and larger battery make it a more compelling device for my needs. I prioritize a smooth user experience, excellent photography capabilities, and long battery life, and the Pura 70 Ultra delivers in these areas. The price difference is significant, but the value proposition of the Pura 70 Ultra justifies the higher cost for me. The lack of specific details on the Kirin 9010's CPU cores makes a definitive performance comparison challenging, but based on its historical performance as a flagship chip, it likely outperforms the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.