Motorola Razr 40 vs Honor 200 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date June 21, 2023 May 31, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 93.53 cm³ 100.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.41 "/g
Weight 188.6 g 199 g
Height 170.8 mm 163.3 mm
Width 74 mm 75.2 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom
  • Black
  • Pink
  • Moonlight White
  • Ocean Cyan

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1224 x 2700
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 437 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 88.22 mAh/in² 113.12 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.91 mAh/cm³ 51.64 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4200 mAh 5200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 644 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40Honor 200 ProPractical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldableStandardRazr 40 offers portability and a unique form factor, Honor 200 Pro provides a traditional smartphone experience.
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7.4163.3 x 75.2 x 8.2Razr 40 is significantly more compact when folded but thicker when unfolded. Honor 200 Pro is thinner overall but larger.
Weight (g)188.6199Razr 40 is slightly lighter.
Display
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDOLEDRazr 40's foldable display allows for a larger screen in a smaller device, but may have a crease. Honor 200 Pro offers a standard, potentially more durable screen.
Size (inches)6.96.78Comparable screen sizes.
Resolution1080 x 26401224 x 2700Honor 200 Pro has a slightly higher resolution, potentially resulting in sharper images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)144120Razr 40 offers a smoother scrolling and gaming experience due to the higher refresh rate.
Peak Brightness (nits)14004000Honor 200 Pro's significantly higher brightness ensures better outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1Snapdragon 8s Gen 3Honor 200 Pro boasts a significantly more powerful processor, leading to much better performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz A710 & 3x2.36 GHz A710 & 4x1.8 GHz A510)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz X4 & 4x2.8 GHz A720 & 3x2.0 GHz A520)Honor 200 Pro's CPU architecture and clock speeds indicate superior processing power.
RAM (GB)812Honor 200 Pro has more RAM, allowing for better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450While Razr 40 has a higher megapixel count, Honor 200 Pro utilizes a larger sensor (1/1.3") and features advanced pixel binning, potentially capturing more light and detail.
Additional Cameras13MP Wide + Macro12MP Wide, 50MP TelephotoHonor 200 Pro offers greater versatility with a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)42005200Honor 200 Pro offers significantly longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Advantages:

  • Portability: The foldable design offers unmatched portability.
  • High Refresh Rate Display: Smoother scrolling and gaming experience.
  • Unique Form Factor: Stands out from traditional smartphones.

Honor 200 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly more powerful processor and more RAM.
  • Brighter Display: Excellent outdoor visibility.
  • Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity for extended usage.
  • Versatile Camera System: Telephoto lens for optical zoom.

Trade-offs:

  • Razr 40: Sacrifices performance and battery life for portability and unique design. Durability of the folding screen is a concern.
  • Honor 200 Pro: Larger and heavier than the Razr 40. Lacks the novelty and portability of a foldable phone.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40: Ideal for users who prioritize portability and style above all else. Suitable for light usage, social media, and casual tasks.

Honor 200 Pro: Best suited for users who demand high performance, long battery life, and a versatile camera. Ideal for gaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. Is portability your top priority? If yes, the Razr 40 is a strong contender.
  2. Do you need top-tier performance for demanding tasks and gaming? If yes, the Honor 200 Pro is the better choice.
  3. What is your budget? Both are in the medium price range, but specific pricing should be compared.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Frequent Traveler: Razr 40 for its compact size.
  • Mobile Gamer: Honor 200 Pro for its powerful processor and larger battery.
  • Photography Enthusiast: Honor 200 Pro for its versatile camera system.

My Choice: Honor 200 Pro

While the Razr 40's foldable design is intriguing, the Honor 200 Pro offers a more well-rounded package for my needs. The significantly more powerful Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 processor, coupled with 12GB of RAM, ensures smooth performance for demanding tasks and gaming. The brighter display, larger battery, and versatile camera system with a telephoto lens further solidify its appeal. The added benefit of a potentially more robust, traditional screen outweighs the novelty of a foldable phone for me. I prioritize performance, battery life, and a great camera experience, making the Honor 200 Pro the clear winner.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.