Motorola Razr 40 vs Google Pixel 8a - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date June 21, 2023 May 14, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 93.53 cm³ 98.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.24 "/g
Weight 188.6 g 188 g
Height 170.8 mm 152.1 mm
Width 74 mm 72.7 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain
  • Bay
  • Aloe

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.1 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 81.2 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 430 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 2000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 88.22 mAh/in² 120.72 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.91 mAh/cm³ 45.64 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4200 mAh 4492 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Google Tensor G3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 644 Immortalis-G715s MC10

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16 21

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40Google Pixel 8aPractical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldableStandardRazr 40 offers compact portability when folded; Pixel 8a is a traditional slab design.
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7.4152.1 x 72.7 x 8.9Razr 40 is significantly shorter and thinner when folded but thicker when unfolded. Pixel 8a is more pocketable in its single form.
Weight (g)188.6188Nearly identical weight, despite the Razr's folding mechanism.
Display
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDOLEDRazr 40's folding screen allows for a larger display in a smaller device; Pixel 8a offers a standard flat display.
Size (inches)6.96.1Razr 40 provides a significantly larger screen for media consumption and multitasking.
Resolution1080 x 26401080 x 2400Similar sharpness despite the size difference, but Razr 40 is slightly sharper due to a higher pixel density.
Refresh Rate (Hz)144120Razr 40 offers smoother scrolling and animations.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1Google Tensor G3Tensor G3 is generally considered more powerful, especially in AI tasks, while the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 focuses on efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510)Tensor G3's more modern architecture and higher clock speeds suggest superior performance.
GPUAdreno 644Immortalis-G715s MC10Immortalis-G715s MC10 should offer noticeably better gaming performance.
RAM (GB)88Both phones offer ample RAM for multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6464Similar resolution; however, Pixel 8a leverages Google's advanced image processing for potentially superior image quality.
Ultrawide (MP)1313Similar resolution; Pixel's computational photography likely provides an edge.
Selfie (MP)3213Razr 40 boasts a higher resolution selfie camera.
Video4K@30fps4K@60fpsPixel 8a can record smoother and more detailed 4K video at 60fps.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)42004492Pixel 8a has a slightly larger battery capacity, potentially leading to longer battery life.
OS & UpdatesAndroid 13 (up to 16)Android 14 (up to 21)Pixel 8a offers longer software support and newer OS features out of the box.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers unique portability and a larger screen in a compact form factor.
  • High Refresh Rate Display: Smoother scrolling and more responsive gaming experience.
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: Better for video calls and self-portraits.

Google Pixel 8a Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Tensor G3 chip offers faster processing and better AI capabilities.
  • Better Camera System: While similar in resolution, Google's computational photography likely results in superior image and video quality.
  • Longer Software Support: Guaranteed updates for a longer period, ensuring security and new features.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • More advanced Bluetooth features: Enhanced audio quality and compatibility with a wider range of devices.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40: Ideal for users who prioritize portability and a large screen for media consumption on the go. The unique form factor is a key selling point.

Google Pixel 8a: Best suited for users who value performance, camera quality, and long-term software updates. Excellent choice for power users, photographers, and those seeking a reliable, future-proof device.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Form Factor Priority: Is a foldable design with its portability benefits crucial, or is a traditional smartphone preferred?
  2. Performance Needs: Are demanding tasks like gaming and heavy multitasking a priority, or is moderate performance sufficient?
  3. Software & Updates: How important is long-term software support and receiving the latest Android features?

My Choice: Google Pixel 8a

While the Razr 40's foldable design is intriguing, the Pixel 8a's superior performance, camera system, and significantly longer software support make it the more compelling choice for me. I prioritize a smooth user experience, high-quality photos and videos, and the assurance of timely updates. The Tensor G3's AI capabilities and Google's commitment to software updates offer significant long-term value. The slightly larger battery is also a plus. While the Razr's form factor is unique, the advantages of the Pixel 8a outweigh the novelty of a foldable phone for my personal needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.