Motorola Razr 40 vs Google Pixel 8 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola Razr 40
Motorola

General

Launch Date June 21, 2023 October 12, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 93.53 cm³ 94.83 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.66 "/g 3.32 "/g
Weight 188.6 g 187 g
Height 170.8 mm 150.5 mm
Width 74 mm 70.8 mm
Thickness 7.4 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Sage Green
  • Vanilla Cream
  • Summer Lilac
  • Grape Compote
  • Cherry Blossom
  • Mint
  • Obsidian
  • Hazel
  • Rose

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.2 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 87.1 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 428 PPI
Refresh Rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1400 nits
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 2000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 88.22 mAh/in² 119.02 mAh/in²
Battery Density 44.91 mAh/cm³ 48.24 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 4200 mAh 4575 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) Google Tensor G3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 644 Immortalis-G715s MC10

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16 21

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40Google Pixel 8Practical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldableStandardRazr 40 offers portability and a unique form factor, Pixel 8 is a traditional slab design.
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7.4150.5 x 70.8 x 8.9Razr 40 is significantly more compact when folded but thicker when unfolded. Pixel 8 offers a more standard feel.
Weight (g)188.6187Negligible weight difference in practical use.
Display
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDOLEDRazr 40's foldable display allows for a larger screen in a smaller device, but introduces a crease. Pixel 8's display is more robust but less compact.
Size (inches)6.96.2Razr 40 offers a larger main display for media consumption.
Resolution (px)1080 x 26401080 x 2400Similar sharpness due to Pixel 8's slightly smaller display size.
Refresh Rate (Hz)144120Razr 40 provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)14002000Pixel 8's display will be significantly more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 7 Gen 1Google Tensor G3Tensor G3 is expected to offer superior performance, especially in AI tasks.
CPUOcta-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510)Tensor G3's more powerful core architecture suggests better performance for demanding tasks.
RAM (GB)88Equivalent RAM capacity.
OSAndroid 13Android 14Pixel 8 launches with the latest Android version and will receive longer software updates.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)6450Pixel's computational photography prowess often outweighs raw megapixel count differences. Real-world image quality comparison requires sample photos.
Ultrawide (MP)1312Both offer ultrawide capabilities; practical difference depends on lens quality and software processing.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fpsUp to 4K@60fpsPixel 8 supports higher resolution and frame rate video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)42004575Pixel 8 has a slightly larger battery capacity. Real-world battery life depends on usage patterns and software optimization.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Advantages:

  • Portability: The foldable design offers significant portability advantages.
  • Larger Display in a Compact Form: The folding screen provides a large display for media consumption when needed.
  • High Refresh Rate Display: Smoother scrolling and animations contribute to a more fluid user experience.

Google Pixel 8 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Tensor G3 chip offers more processing power, especially for AI-driven tasks.
  • Longer Software Support: Google guarantees longer OS and security updates for Pixel devices.
  • Brighter Display: Better visibility in direct sunlight.
  • Advanced Camera Features: Pixel's computational photography and video recording capabilities are generally considered top-tier.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40: Users who prioritize portability and a unique form factor over raw performance. Ideal for those who value having a large screen available in a compact device.

Google Pixel 8: Users who prioritize performance, camera quality, software updates, and a reliable overall experience. Suitable for power users, photography enthusiasts, and those who value a robust and future-proof device.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is portability? If pocketability is paramount, the Razr 40's foldable design is a clear winner.
  2. What is your budget and how much do you value performance? The Pixel 8 offers better performance but may come at a slightly higher price.
  3. How important is camera quality and software updates? The Pixel 8 generally excels in these areas.

My Choice: Google Pixel 8

While the Razr 40's foldable design is intriguing, the Pixel 8's superior performance, camera capabilities, and guaranteed long-term software support are more important to me. I prioritize a smooth, reliable user experience with access to the latest features and security updates. The brighter display and larger battery are also significant advantages for my usage patterns. While I appreciate the Razr's portability, the potential trade-offs in performance and longevity outweigh the benefits of the foldable form factor for my personal needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.