Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 5, 2023 January 12, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 88.47 cm³ 98.98 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.74 "/g 3.59 "/g
Weight 184.5 g 186 g
Height 170.8 mm 160.5 mm
Width 74 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 7 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Black
  • Yellow
  • Gray

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 90.1 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 1800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 79.82 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42.95 mAh/cm³ 50.52 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 3800 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali G615-MC6

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40 UltraXiaomi Poco X6 ProPractical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldableStandardRazr offers portability and novelty; Poco offers a larger, more traditional experience.
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3Razr is significantly thinner when folded, but larger when unfolded. Poco is thicker but potentially more comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight (g)184.5186Negligible weight difference in practical usage.
Display
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDAMOLEDRazr's foldable display allows for a compact form factor when closed and a large screen when open. Poco offers a traditional large screen experience.
Size (inches)6.96.67Razr provides a larger display area when unfolded.
Resolution1080 x 26401220 x 2712Poco has a slightly sharper display due to higher pixel density.
Refresh Rate (Hz)165120Razr offers smoother scrolling and animations, beneficial for gaming and fast-paced content.
Peak Brightness (nits)14001800Poco's display can get significantly brighter, improving outdoor visibility.
Color Depth1B68BPoco offers a wider color gamut, resulting in more vibrant and accurate colors.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Dimensity 8300 UltraBoth are powerful chipsets, but benchmarks would be needed to determine real-world performance differences.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.19 GHz X2 & 3x2.75 GHz A710 & 4x1.80 GHz A510)Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz A715 & 3x3.20 GHz A715 & 4x2.20 GHz A510)CPU configurations suggest comparable performance; real-world usage and benchmarks are necessary for accurate comparison.
GPUAdreno 730Mali G615-MC6Adreno 730 generally offers better gaming performance compared to Mali G615-MC6.
RAM (GB)8/128/12Both offer ample RAM for multitasking; differences would primarily manifest in sustained performance over extended periods.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)1264Poco boasts a significantly higher resolution main camera, potentially capturing more detail.
Ultrawide (MP)138Razr offers a higher resolution ultrawide lens.
Macro (MP)N/A2Poco includes a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots.
Selfie (MP)3216Razr has a much higher resolution front-facing camera, beneficial for video calls and selfies.
Video CapabilitiesUp to 4K@60fpsUp to 4K@30fpsRazr can record higher resolution and frame rate video.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)38005000Poco offers significantly longer battery life due to a much larger battery capacity.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Advantages:

  • Form Factor: The foldable design offers unmatched portability and a unique user experience.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother animations and scrolling.
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: Superior quality for video calls and self-portraits.
  • Higher Video Resolution and Frame Rate: Better quality video recording.

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: Significantly longer battery life.
  • Brighter Display: Enhanced outdoor visibility.
  • Wider Color Gamut: More vibrant and accurate colors.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: Potentially capturing more detailed photos.
  • Lower Price: Offers better value for the price, especially considering the larger battery and display.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Ideal for users who prioritize portability and novelty and are willing to compromise on battery life for a compact and stylish device. Suitable for users who value a smooth display and high-quality selfie camera.

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro: Best suited for users who prioritize battery life, display quality, and overall value. Excellent for users who consume media, play games, and need a phone that lasts all day.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is portability? If ultimate portability is paramount, the Razr is the clear winner.
  2. How much do you value battery life? If all-day battery life is essential, the Poco X6 Pro is the better choice.
  3. What is your budget? The Poco X6 Pro offers better value for its price.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro

While the Razr 40 Ultra's foldable design is undeniably appealing, the Poco X6 Pro offers a more well-rounded package for my needs. The significantly larger battery, brighter display with a wider color gamut, and the lower price point make it a compelling choice. I prioritize battery life and value, and the Poco X6 Pro delivers in those areas without significant compromises in performance. While the Razr excels in portability and selfie quality, these are not as crucial for my usage compared to all-day battery and a great display. The price difference further solidifies the Poco X6 Pro as the more sensible choice for me.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.