Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco X6 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 5, 2023 January 12, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 88.47 cm³ 95.82 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.74 "/g 3.69 "/g
Weight 184.5 g 181 g
Height 170.8 mm 161.2 mm
Width 74 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 7 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.67 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1220 x 2712
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 89.7 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 446 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 1800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 79.82 mAh/in² 114.64 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42.95 mAh/cm³ 53.23 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 3800 mAh 5100 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Adreno 710

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40 UltraXiaomi Poco X6Practical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldableSlabRazr offers portability and a unique form factor, Poco X6 is a traditional candybar design.
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7161.2 x 74.3 x 8Razr is significantly thinner when folded but taller when unfolded. Poco X6 offers a more standard, larger grip.
Weight (g)184.5181Negligible weight difference in practical use.
Display
Display TypeFoldable AMOLEDAMOLEDRazr's folding display allows for compact storage; Poco X6 has a larger, uninterrupted screen.
Size (inches)6.96.67Poco X6 offers a slightly larger display area.
Resolution (px)1080 x 26401220 x 2712Poco X6 has a sharper display with higher pixel density (446 ppi vs 413 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)165120Razr offers smoother scrolling and animations due to the higher refresh rate.
Peak Brightness (nits)14001800Poco X6's significantly higher peak brightness provides better outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Snapdragon 7s Gen 2Razr's processor offers significantly better performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (3.19 GHz)Octa-core (2.4 GHz)Razr's higher clock speeds contribute to its superior performance.
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 710Razr's GPU is more powerful, resulting in smoother gaming and faster graphics rendering.
RAM (GB)8 (Listed)12Poco X6 offers more RAM, enabling better multitasking and app switching. Note: Razr has 12GB versions available, not reflected in the provided data.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)1264Poco X6 boasts a much higher resolution main camera sensor, potentially capturing more detail.
Ultrawide (MP)138Razr has a higher resolution ultrawide lens.
Selfie (MP)3216Razr has a significantly higher resolution selfie camera.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)38005100Poco X6 offers a significantly larger battery, likely resulting in much longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Advantages:

  • Form Factor: The foldable design offers unmatched portability and a unique user experience.
  • Performance: Significantly more powerful processor and GPU for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother scrolling and animations.
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: Better quality self-portraits.

Xiaomi Poco X6 Advantages:

  • Larger Display: More screen real estate for media consumption and multitasking.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: Potentially captures more detailed photos.
  • Significantly Larger Battery: Longer battery life.
  • Higher Peak Brightness: Better visibility in direct sunlight.
  • More RAM: Improved multitasking and app switching.
  • Lower Price: Offers a better price-to-performance ratio for average users.

Trade-offs:

  • Razr: Sacrifices battery life and main camera resolution for portability and performance. Higher price for the foldable technology.
  • Poco X6: Sacrifices portability and peak performance for a larger display, battery, and a more affordable price.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Ideal for users who prioritize portability and a unique, stylish device and are willing to pay a premium. Use cases include: frequent travelers, trendsetters, and those who value compact design.

Xiaomi Poco X6: Ideal for users who prioritize battery life, a large display, and value for money. Use cases include: media consumption, gaming (casual), everyday tasks, and budget-conscious buyers.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is portability? If ultimate portability is paramount, the Razr is the clear winner.
  2. What is your budget? The Poco X6 offers excellent value for its price, while the Razr is a premium device.
  3. What are your primary use cases? Demanding tasks and gaming favor the Razr; media consumption and long battery life favor the Poco X6.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco X6

While the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is a compelling device with its unique foldable design and powerful performance, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco X6. My primary needs are a large, high-quality display for media consumption, long battery life, and good overall performance for everyday tasks. The Poco X6 excels in these areas while offering a significantly lower price point. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is powerful enough for my needs, and the 12GB of RAM ensures smooth multitasking. The larger battery capacity of the Poco X6 is a major deciding factor, as I prioritize all-day battery life. While I acknowledge the Razr's unique appeal, the Poco X6 better suits my practical needs and budget.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.