Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs vivo V30 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
vivo V30
vivo V30
Vivo

General

Launch Date June 5, 2023 March 4, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 88.47 cm³ 92.6 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.74 "/g 3.65 "/g
Weight 184.5 g 186 g
Height 170.8 mm 164.4 mm
Width 74 mm 75.1 mm
Thickness 7 mm 7.5 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Bloom White
  • Waving Aqua
  • Lush Green
  • Noble Black

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 89.9 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 453 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1200 nits
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 2800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 79.82 mAh/in² 108.77 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42.95 mAh/cm³ 54 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 3800 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 730 Adreno 720

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40 Ultravivo V30Practical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldableStandardRazr 40 Ultra offers portability and a smaller footprint when folded, but potentially more fragility. Vivo V30 is a traditional slab phone.
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7164.4 x 75.1 x 7.5Razr 40 Ultra is significantly thinner when unfolded but taller. Vivo V30 is a more standard size.
Weight (g)184.5186Negligible weight difference.
Display
Display Size (inches)6.96.78Similar screen real estate.
Resolution1080 x 26401260 x 2800Vivo V30 has a slightly sharper display due to higher resolution.
Refresh Rate (Hz)165120Razr 40 Ultra offers smoother scrolling and animations.
Panel TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDAMOLEDRazr 40 Ultra's foldable display allows for unique use cases like using the external display for quick tasks. Vivo V30 has a standard, durable AMOLED.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Snapdragon 7 Gen 3Razr 40 Ultra offers significantly better performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Razr 40 Ultra has a more powerful CPU architecture.
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 720Razr 40 Ultra offers superior graphics processing for gaming and visually intensive applications.
RAM (GB)88Both phones have the same amount of RAM.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)1250Vivo V30 boasts a higher resolution main sensor, potentially capturing more detail.
Selfie Camera (MP)3250Vivo V30 has a much higher resolution selfie camera.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@60fpsUp to 4K@30fpsRazr 40 Ultra can record higher quality video at higher frame rates.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)38005000Vivo V30 has a significantly larger battery, likely resulting in longer battery life. This is notable given the Razr's power hungry folding screen and flagship chipset.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Advantages:

  • Form Factor: The foldable design offers unique portability and a larger external display for quick interactions.
  • Performance: Significantly more powerful processor and GPU for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother animations and scrolling experience.
  • Higher Quality Video Recording: Supports 4K@60fps with HDR and EIS.

vivo V30 Advantages:

  • Battery Life: Larger battery capacity suggests significantly longer usage time.
  • Higher Resolution Main and Selfie Cameras: Potentially better image detail and clarity.
  • More Affordable: Generally priced lower than the Razr 40 Ultra (based on provided limited pricing data).

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Ideal for users who prioritize portability, cutting-edge technology, a unique form factor, and performance. Suitable for heavy multitaskers, gamers, and content creators who value a high-quality display and video recording capabilities.

vivo V30: Best suited for users who value battery life, camera quality for photos, and affordability. A good choice for everyday users, social media enthusiasts, and those who prioritize long usage times without frequent charging.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is portability and a unique design? If paramount, the Razr 40 Ultra's foldable design is a compelling factor.
  2. What is your budget and how important is the price-to-performance ratio? The Vivo V30 offers competitive specs at a likely lower price point.
  3. What are your primary usage patterns? Heavy users and gamers will benefit from the Razr's performance, while those focused on photography and all-day battery life might prefer the Vivo V30.

My Choice: vivo V30

While the Razr 40 Ultra is undoubtedly a more exciting and powerful device, the Vivo V30 better suits my personal needs. I prioritize battery life and a reliable, durable phone for everyday use. The Vivo V30's significantly larger battery, combined with a strong camera system and a more affordable price, makes it the more practical choice for me. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 is powerful enough for my usage, and I am willing to trade the slightly lower performance for significantly improved longevity. The foldable form factor, while innovative, doesn't outweigh the benefits of longer battery life and a lower price point for my personal use case.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.