Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Sony Xperia 10 V - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 5, 2023 June 21, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 88.47 cm³ 87.48 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.74 "/g 3.84 "/g
Weight 184.5 g 159 g
Height 170.8 mm 155 mm
Width 74 mm 68 mm
Thickness 7 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Black
  • White
  • Lavender
  • Sage Green

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.1 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1080 x 2520
Aspect Ratio 22:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 82.5 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 449 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 79.82 mAh/in² 134.37 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42.95 mAh/cm³ 57.15 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 3800 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
GPU Adreno 730 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40 UltraSony Xperia 10 VPractical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldableStandardRazr offers a compact folded size for portability, Xperia offers a traditional candybar design.
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7155 x 68 x 8.3Razr is thinner when unfolded but significantly wider. Xperia is overall more pocketable when unfolded.
Weight (g)184.5159Razr is noticeably heavier.
Display
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDOLEDRazr's folding display allows for a large screen in a compact device; potential for crease visibility. Xperia offers a standard, potentially more durable, flat OLED.
Size (inches)6.96.1Razr provides significantly more screen real estate for multitasking and media consumption.
Resolution1080 x 26401080 x 2520Similar sharpness due to Xperia's smaller screen size, but Razr offers a taller aspect ratio.
Refresh Rate165HzUnspecifiedRazr's high refresh rate delivers smoother animations and scrolling. Missing Xperia refresh rate information hinders comparison.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Snapdragon 695 5GRazr offers significantly faster processing and graphics performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)Razr's CPU architecture and higher clock speeds provide a substantial performance advantage.
RAM8GB/12GB6GB/8GBRazr offers more RAM in certain configurations, improving multitasking and app performance.
Camera
Main Camera12MP48MPWhile Xperia boasts higher resolution, Razr's larger sensor pixel size (unspecified but likely larger given lower resolution and f/1.5 aperture) potentially offers better low-light performance. Image quality depends on processing, not just resolution.
Ultrawide13MP8MPRazr has a higher resolution ultrawide.
TelephotoNone8MPXperia offers optical zoom capabilities missing on the Razr.
VideoUp to 4K@60fps with HDR, EIS1080p@30fpsRazr offers superior video recording capabilities with higher resolution, frame rates, and HDR.
Battery
Capacity3800 mAh5000 mAhXperia offers significantly longer battery life. Razr's smaller battery is likely due to space constraints of the foldable design.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Compact portability with a large screen when unfolded.
  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor and graphics for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother and more responsive user experience.
  • Advanced Video Recording: Higher resolution, frame rates, and HDR.

Sony Xperia 10 V Advantages:

  • Longer Battery Life: Significantly larger battery capacity for extended usage.
  • Lighter and More Pocketable (when unfolded): Easier to carry and use in one hand.
  • Optical Zoom: Versatility for capturing distant subjects.
  • Lower Price: Generally more affordable than the Razr.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Users who prioritize portability and a large screen, value top-tier performance for gaming and demanding apps, and appreciate a unique, stylish design. Ideal for those who consume a lot of media on the go.

Sony Xperia 10 V: Users who prioritize battery life, prefer a traditional smartphone form factor, need a reliable device for everyday tasks, and are on a tighter budget. Ideal for those who value simplicity and long usage times.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is portability versus battery life? A foldable phone offers unparalleled portability, but often at the cost of battery life.
  2. What is your performance requirement? The Razr significantly outperforms the Xperia, making it suitable for demanding tasks like gaming.
  3. What is your budget? The Xperia offers good value for its price, while the Razr is a premium option.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Heavy Traveler: Razr for its compact size, allowing for easier pocket storage.
  • Power User: Razr for its superior performance and large screen for multitasking.
  • Budget-Conscious User: Xperia for its affordability and long battery life.
  • Photography Enthusiast: Xperia for its dedicated telephoto lens offering optical zoom.

My Choice: Sony Xperia 10 V

While the Razr 40 Ultra boasts impressive specs and a captivating design, I would choose the Sony Xperia 10 V. My personal priorities lean towards practicality and battery life. The Xperia's significantly larger battery capacity ensures I can comfortably use the phone throughout the day without worrying about recharging. While I appreciate the Razr's foldable design and performance capabilities, the trade-offs in battery life and price are not compelling enough for my personal needs. The Xperia offers a solid balance of features, performance, and battery life in a more traditional, reliable package, at a more appealing price point. I also appreciate having a dedicated telephoto lens, which is missing on the Razr. Ultimately, the Xperia better aligns with my daily usage patterns and priorities.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.