Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Sony Xperia 1 VI - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 5, 2023 June 3, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 88.47 cm³ 98.3 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.74 "/g 3.39 "/g
Weight 184.5 g 192 g
Height 170.8 mm 162 mm
Width 74 mm 74 mm
Thickness 7 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Black
  • Platinum silver
  • Khaki green
  • Scar red

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 22:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 86.5 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 79.82 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42.95 mAh/cm³ 50.86 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 3800 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 730 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, Video Output

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40 UltraSony Xperia 1 VIPractical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldableTraditional SlabRazr offers portability and novelty; Xperia provides a familiar form factor.
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7162 x 74 x 8.2Razr is significantly thinner when folded but taller unfolded. Xperia is more pocketable when unfolded.
Weight (g)184.5192Negligible weight difference in real-world usage.
Display
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDLTPO OLEDRazr's folding display enables compact portability and a unique user experience. Xperia offers a larger, uninterrupted canvas.
Size (inches)6.96.5Razr provides a larger main screen but with a crease. Xperia's screen is more traditional.
Resolution1080 x 26401080 x 2340Similar pixel density, sharpness should be comparable. Razr is taller due to aspect ratio.
Refresh Rate (Hz)165120Razr offers smoother scrolling and animations.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Snapdragon 8 Gen 3Xperia boasts a newer, more powerful processor, resulting in potentially faster performance and better efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.19 GHz X2 & 3x2.75 GHz A710 & 4x1.80 GHz A510)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz X4 & 3x3.2 GHz A720 & 2x3.0 GHz A720 & 2x2.3 GHz A520)Xperia's CPU has a higher clock speed and newer architecture, likely leading to better multi-tasking and demanding application performance.
RAM (GB)8/1212Xperia offers more RAM in this comparison, beneficial for heavy multitasking and demanding apps.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)1248Xperia has significantly higher resolution, potentially capturing more detail.
Other Cameras13MP Wide, 32MP Selfie12.2MP Wide, 12MP Telephoto, 12MP SelfieXperia provides more versatile camera options with dedicated telephoto lens.
Video CapabilitiesUp to 4K@60fpsUp to 4K@120fpsXperia offers higher frame rate video recording for smoother slow-motion footage.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)38005000Xperia offers significantly longer battery life. Razr's smaller battery is likely due to space constraints of the folding design.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Advantages:

  • Portability: The foldable design offers unparalleled portability.
  • Novelty: The unique form factor is eye-catching and offers a different user experience.
  • Faster Refresh Rate: Smoother scrolling and animations compared to Xperia.

Sony Xperia 1 VI Advantages:

  • Performance: More powerful processor and more RAM for demanding tasks.
  • Battery Life: Significantly larger battery capacity for extended usage.
  • Camera Versatility: Dedicated telephoto lens and higher resolution main sensor.
  • Larger Uninterrupted Display: Offers a traditional, larger screen experience without a crease.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Ideal for users who prioritize portability and novelty above all else. Best for those who value a compact phone for easy carrying and are willing to compromise on battery life and raw performance. Use cases include frequent travelers, social media enthusiasts who prioritize quick capture moments, and users who value a unique device.

Sony Xperia 1 VI: Suitable for users who prioritize performance, battery life, and camera versatility. Best for mobile gamers, photographers/videographers, and power users who need a reliable device for demanding tasks. Use cases include content creation, gaming, and extended use without frequent charging.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is portability to you? If ultimate portability is paramount, the Razr is the clear winner.
  2. What is your primary phone usage? For demanding tasks like gaming or content creation, the Xperia's superior performance and battery life are crucial. If it's primarily communication and light social media, the Razr might suffice.
  3. What is your budget? Both are listed as "medium price," but real-world pricing should be compared considering storage options.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Frequent Traveler: Razr for its compact size.
  • Mobile Gamer: Xperia for its performance and battery life.
  • Photographer: Xperia for its versatile camera system.

My Choice: Sony Xperia 1 VI

While the Razr 40 Ultra's foldable design is intriguing, the Xperia 1 VI better suits my needs. I prioritize performance, battery life, and a versatile camera system. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, coupled with 12GB of RAM, ensures smooth multitasking and handles demanding applications with ease. The larger battery capacity provides peace of mind for extended use without constantly searching for a charger. Finally, the Xperia's camera system, featuring a high-resolution sensor and a dedicated telephoto lens, offers greater flexibility for capturing high-quality photos and videos. The trade-off of a slightly larger form factor is acceptable considering the significant gains in performance, battery life, and camera capabilities. The foldable phone technology is not quite mature enough for me to sacrifice these key features.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.