Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A15 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 5, 2023 December 16, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 88.47 cm³ 103.28 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.74 "/g 3.25 "/g
Weight 184.5 g 200 g
Height 170.8 mm 160.1 mm
Width 74 mm 76.8 mm
Thickness 7 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Brave Black
  • Optimistic Blue
  • Magical Blue
  • Personality Yellow

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 22:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 84.3 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness 1400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 79.82 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42.95 mAh/cm³ 48.41 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 3800 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40 UltraSamsung Galaxy A15 5GPractical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldableStandardRazr 40 Ultra offers portability and a larger screen in a compact design. A15 5G is a traditional slab phone.
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7160.1 x 76.8 x 8.4Razr 40 Ultra is significantly thinner when folded but taller when unfolded. A15 5G is thicker but potentially more comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight (g)184.5200Razr 40 Ultra is lighter despite its larger screen.
Display
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDSuper AMOLEDRazr 40 Ultra's foldable display allows for a larger screen in a smaller device. Both offer vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Display Size (inches)6.96.5Larger display on Razr 40 Ultra provides more immersive content consumption.
Resolution1080 x 26401080 x 2340Similar sharpness, though Razr 40 Ultra is slightly sharper due to a taller aspect ratio.
Refresh Rate (Hz)16590Razr 40 Ultra offers smoother scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness (nits)1400800Razr 40 Ultra is significantly brighter, improving outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Dimensity 6100+Razr 40 Ultra boasts a flagship processor, resulting in significantly faster performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Razr 40 Ultra's CPU architecture is superior, offering better performance and efficiency.
GPUAdreno 730Mali-G57 MC2Razr 40 Ultra's GPU offers significantly better graphics performance for gaming and other visually demanding tasks.
RAM (GB)8/124/6/8Razr 40 Ultra offers more RAM in certain variants, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)1250While A15 has higher megapixel count, Razr 40 Ultra's larger sensor and wider aperture (f/1.5) likely result in better low-light performance. Image quality depends on processing as well.
Ultrawide (MP)135Razr's ultrawide offers higher resolution.
Selfie Camera (MP)3213Razr 40 Ultra has a much higher resolution selfie camera.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@60fps with HDR, EIS1080p@30fps with EISRazr 40 Ultra offers superior video recording capabilities with higher resolution, frame rate, and HDR.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)38005000A15 5G offers a significantly larger battery capacity, potentially leading to longer battery life. Razr's foldable design and powerful processor might consume more power.
Other
OSAndroid 13Android 14Both run on recent Android versions, but A15 5G has a newer version at launch. Long-term software updates are crucial.
Price RangeMediumMediumBoth are in the mid-range, but specific pricing varies by region and storage configuration. Razr is likely more expensive due to foldable technology.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers portability and a larger screen in a compact form factor.
  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor and GPU for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Smoother Display: Higher refresh rate (165Hz) and brighter display for better visual experience.
  • Advanced Camera Features: Higher resolution selfie camera and superior video recording capabilities.

Samsung Galaxy A15 5G Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • Lower Price: Likely more affordable than the Razr 40 Ultra.
  • Newer Android Version at Launch: Ships with Android 14, offering potentially newer features out of the box.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Ideal for users who prioritize portability, a large screen, cutting-edge performance, and a unique design. Suitable for power users, content creators, and those who value a premium mobile experience.

Samsung Galaxy A15 5G: Suitable for users seeking a budget-friendly 5G phone with a long-lasting battery. Good for casual users, students, and those who prioritize affordability over top-tier performance.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is portability and a large screen? Foldable design prioritizes this.
  2. What is your budget? Razr 40 Ultra is likely more expensive.
  3. What are your performance needs? Razr 40 Ultra offers significantly better performance.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Power User: Razr 40 Ultra is a better choice.
  • Budget-Conscious User: A15 5G is a good option.
  • User Prioritizing Battery Life: A15 5G likely offers better battery life due to larger capacity.

My Choice: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

Reasoning: While the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G offers a compelling value proposition with its long battery life and affordability, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's unique foldable design, superior performance, and smoother display are more appealing to me. I value the portability and larger screen offered by the foldable form factor, and I'm willing to pay a premium for the flagship-level performance. The higher refresh rate and brighter display also significantly enhance the overall user experience. The reduced battery life is a trade-off I'm willing to accept for the benefits the Razr provides.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.