Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A05 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 5, 2023 October 15, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 88.47 cm³ 116.16 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.74 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 184.5 g 195 g
Height 170.8 mm 168.8 mm
Width 74 mm 78.2 mm
Thickness 7 mm 8.8 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Light Green

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 82.1 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 262 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 79.82 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42.95 mAh/cm³ 43.04 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 3800 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40 UltraSamsung Galaxy A05Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7168.8 x 78.2 x 8.8Razr 40 Ultra significantly thinner due to foldable design; A05 larger and thicker. Impacts pocketability and one-handed use.
Weight (g)184.5195Razr 40 Ultra lighter despite larger main screen due to thin build. Noticeable difference in hand.
FoldableYesNoRazr's foldable design offers compact portability and a unique form factor. A05 is a traditional slab phone.
Display
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDPLS LCDRazr boasts superior contrast, vibrant colors, and power efficiency due to AMOLED and LTPO. A05's LCD is less impressive visually.
Size (inches)6.96.7Similar screen sizes, but Razr's foldable nature makes it smaller when closed.
Resolution1080 x 2640720 x 1600Razr offers much sharper visuals (413 ppi vs 262 ppi). Noticeable difference in clarity for text, images, and videos.
Refresh Rate165HzUnspecifiedRazr's high refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations. Lack of A05 refresh rate specification hinders direct comparison, but likely lower impacting smoothness.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1MediaTek Helio G85Razr vastly outperforms A05 in processing power. Impacts gaming, multitasking, and app loading speeds.
CPUOcta-core (up to 3.19 GHz)Octa-core (up to 2.0 GHz)Razr's CPU has significantly higher clock speeds, resulting in faster performance.
RAM8GB/12GB4GB/6GBRazr offers more RAM, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with demanding apps.
Camera
Main Camera12MP50MPDespite lower resolution, Razr likely produces better image quality due to superior processing and potentially larger sensor size (unspecified for both). MegaPixel count is not the sole indicator of image quality.
Selfie Camera32MP8MPRazr's higher resolution selfie camera potentially captures more detail.
VideoUp to 4K@60fps with HDR, EISUp to 1080p@60fpsRazr offers higher resolution and frame rate video recording with HDR for better dynamic range.
Battery
Capacity3800 mAh5000 mAhA05 has a larger battery capacity, potentially lasting longer on a single charge. Razr's smaller battery is likely a trade-off for its slim foldable design.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful: Superior chipset, CPU, and RAM for smoother performance.
  • Higher quality display: Foldable AMOLED with higher resolution, refresh rate, and better color accuracy.
  • More premium design: Slim, foldable form factor.
  • Better camera features: Higher resolution selfie camera, 4K video recording with HDR and EIS.

Samsung Galaxy A05 Advantages:

  • Larger battery capacity: Potentially longer battery life.
  • Lower price: Significantly more affordable.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a premium design, a compact form factor, and cutting-edge technology. Best for demanding tasks, multimedia consumption, and those who value portability and aesthetics.

Samsung Galaxy A05: Suitable for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality, long battery life, and affordability over high performance or premium features. Best for casual use, calling, texting, and light browsing.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Razr is significantly more expensive.
  2. What are your performance needs? For demanding tasks and gaming, the Razr is essential.
  3. How important is portability and design? The Razr's foldable design offers unique portability advantages.

My Choice: Motorola Razr 40 Ultra

While the Samsung Galaxy A05 offers excellent value for its price, the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra is the clear winner for me. I prioritize performance, a high-quality display, and innovative design. The Razr's foldable form factor, powerful chipset, and stunning AMOLED screen provide a superior user experience. While the battery life might be a slight concern, the overall package offered by the Razr, including its advanced camera features, outweighs this drawback for my usage patterns. The A05 is a solid budget option, but it doesn't offer the cutting-edge experience I seek. The Razr's higher price is justified by its significantly superior features and overall quality.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.