Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs realme 8 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
realme 8
Realme

General

Launch Date June 5, 2023 May 28, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 88.47 cm³ 105.85 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.74 "/g 3.55 "/g
Weight 184.5 g 191 g
Height 170.8 mm 162 mm
Width 74 mm 75.1 mm
Thickness 7 mm 8.7 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Fluid Silver
  • Razor Green

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1264 x 2780
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 91.8 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 450 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 1000 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 1600 nits
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 6000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 79.82 mAh/in² 119.65 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42.95 mAh/cm³ 51.96 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 3800 mAh 5500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM7675 Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x1.9 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 730 Adreno 732

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40 Ultrarealme 8Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7162 x 75.1 x 8.7Razr 40 Ultra significantly thinner when folded, but taller and slightly wider when unfolded. Realme 8 is a more traditional candybar design.
Weight (g)184.5191Razr 40 Ultra is lighter despite the folding mechanism.
FoldableYesNoRazr 40 Ultra offers portability advantages when folded but adds complexity and potential durability concerns.
Display
Display Size (inches)6.96.78Similar screen real estate when unfolded.
Resolution (px)1080 x 26401264 x 2780Realme 8 has a slightly sharper display due to higher pixel density.
Refresh Rate (Hz)165120Razr 40 Ultra offers smoother scrolling and animations.
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDLTPO AMOLEDBoth offer vibrant colors and deep blacks, but the Razr's folding screen introduces a crease and potential durability issues. Realme 8 having LTPO allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, saving battery.
Peak Brightness (nits)14006000Realme 8 boasts significantly higher peak brightness, improving outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3Both are powerful chips, but Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Razr 40 Ultra offers a performance advantage in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.19 GHz X2 & 3x2.75 GHz A710 & 4x1.80 GHz A510)Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz X4 & 4x2.6 GHz A720 & 3x1.9 GHz A520)Razr 40 Ultra has a slightly faster prime core, but the newer architecture of the Realme 8 might offer better efficiency. More real-world testing is needed to definitively compare performance.
GPUAdreno 730Adreno 732Marginal GPU differences, likely resulting in similar gaming performance.
RAM8GB (reviewed model)12GB (reviewed model)Realme 8 offers more RAM, enabling better multitasking and app retention.
Camera
Rear Camera12MP Main + 13MP Wide & MacroSpecifications MissingCannot compare without Realme 8 camera details.
Selfie Camera32MPSpecifications MissingCannot compare without Realme 8 camera details.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)38005500Realme 8 offers significantly longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Advantages:

  • Form Factor: The foldable design offers unmatched portability.
  • Higher Peak Performance: The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 and faster refresh rate provide a smoother, more responsive experience in demanding tasks.

Realme 8 Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: Significantly larger battery capacity translates to longer usage time.
  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution leads to a crisper viewing experience.
  • Brighter Display: Superior outdoor visibility due to significantly higher peak brightness.
  • More RAM: Improved multitasking and reduced app reloading.

Trade-offs:

  • Razr 40 Ultra: Portability comes at the cost of battery life and potential durability concerns due to the folding screen.
  • Realme 8: Lacks the unique portability of a foldable phone.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Ideal for users who prioritize portability and style above all else and are willing to compromise on battery life. Best for those who value having a compact phone that easily fits in a pocket.

Realme 8: Suitable for users who prioritize battery life, performance, and a large, bright display. Best for media consumption, gaming, and extended use without frequent charging. Good for users seeking a traditional smartphone experience with robust specifications.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is portability? A foldable phone offers significant size advantages.
  2. How much do you prioritize battery life? The Realme 8 has a much larger battery.
  3. What is your budget and how important is having the latest technology? Consider the price difference and the value proposition of each phone.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Frequent Traveler: Razr 40 Ultra for its compact size.
  • Heavy Media Consumer: Realme 8 for its large battery and bright display.
  • Budget-Conscious User: Need more pricing information to make a recommendation, but the Realme 8 appears to offer strong value based on the provided specifications.

My Choice: realme 8

While the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's foldable design is intriguing, the realme 8's combination of a larger battery, brighter and sharper display, more RAM, and a powerful (though slightly less so than the Razr) processor makes it a more practical choice for my needs. I prioritize battery life and a great media consumption experience, and the realme 8 delivers in these areas. The significantly higher peak brightness is crucial for outdoor usage. While the missing camera specifications for the realme 8 are a concern, the available information points to a well-rounded and compelling device. The Razr 40 Ultra's portability is attractive, but the trade-offs in battery life and potential durability concerns outweigh the benefits for me personally. I appreciate the faster refresh rate of the Razr, but the difference between 120Hz and 165Hz is less noticeable than the difference in battery life and screen brightness. Finally, while I don't have pricing information to compare directly, both are in the "medium price" range, and the realme 8 seems to offer excellent value based purely on specifications.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.