Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Google Pixel Fold - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 5, 2023 June 27, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 88.47 cm³ 128.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.74 "/g 2.69 "/g
Weight 184.5 g 283 g
Height 170.8 mm 139.7 mm
Width 74 mm 158.7 mm
Thickness 7 mm 5.8 mm
Foldable Design Yes Yes
Available Colors
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Obsidian
  • Porcelain

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 7.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1840 x 2208
Aspect Ratio 22:9 16:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 82.7 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 378 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 1450 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 79.82 mAh/in² 83.47 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42.95 mAh/cm³ 37.49 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 3800 mAh 4821 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Google Tensor G2 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G710 MP7

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 16 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40 UltraGoogle Pixel FoldPractical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldable FlipFoldable BookRazr offers a compact pocketable design when folded; Pixel Fold offers a larger tablet-like experience when unfolded.
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7139.7 x 158.7 x 5.8Razr is significantly thinner and more compact when folded, but Pixel Fold is wider when unfolded.
Weight (g)184.5283Razr is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for one-handed use and carrying.
Display
Main Display Size6.9"7.6"Pixel Fold offers a larger main display for better multitasking and media consumption.
Main Display Resolution1080 x 26401840 x 2208Pixel Fold has a higher resolution, resulting in sharper text and images.
Main Display Refresh Rate165Hz120HzRazr's higher refresh rate provides smoother animations and scrolling, although the difference might not be noticeable for all users.
External Display Size3.6"N/ARazr's large external display allows for more interaction without unfolding the phone, a significant advantage for quick tasks.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Google Tensor G2Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 generally offers higher benchmark performance, but Tensor G2 excels in AI and machine learning tasks.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.19 GHz X2 & 3x2.75 GHz A710 & 4x1.80 GHz A510)Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz X1 & 2x2.35 GHz A78 & 4x1.80 GHz A55)Both are powerful CPUs; Snapdragon may have a slight edge in raw processing power, but real-world performance differences might be minimal.
RAM8GB/12GB12GBPixel Fold offers more RAM, potentially benefiting multitasking and demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera12MP48MPPixel Fold has a significantly higher resolution main camera sensor.
Ultrawide13MP10.8MPSimilar ultrawide cameras, although Razr has slightly higher resolution.
TelephotoNo dedicated telephoto lens10.8MP (5x optical zoom)Pixel Fold offers a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom, a significant advantage for photography versatility.
Battery
Capacity3800 mAh4821 mAhPixel Fold has a larger battery capacity, likely resulting in longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Advantages:

  • Compactness and Portability: Significantly smaller and lighter when folded.
  • Larger, More Functional External Display: Allows for many tasks without unfolding.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Potentially smoother scrolling and animations.
  • Potentially Lower Price: Listed as "medium price" compared to Pixel Fold's "medium price", but real-world pricing may vary and should be checked.

Google Pixel Fold Advantages:

  • Larger Main Display: Better for multitasking and media consumption.
  • Higher Resolution Main Display: Sharper visuals.
  • More RAM: Improved performance with demanding apps and multitasking.
  • Superior Camera System: Higher resolution main sensor and dedicated telephoto lens with optical zoom.
  • Larger Battery Capacity: Longer battery life.
  • Google's Software and AI Integration: Pixel-exclusive features and timely updates.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Ideal for users who prioritize portability and compactness above all else. Best for those who frequently use their phone one-handed and value quick access to notifications and basic tasks via the external display.

Google Pixel Fold: Suitable for users who want a larger screen for productivity and media consumption when unfolded, combined with a flagship-level camera system. Best for those who prioritize performance, photography, and a longer battery life.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Portability vs. Screen Size: Do you prioritize a compact phone that easily fits in your pocket or a larger screen for productivity and media?
  2. Camera Quality vs. Convenience: Is a top-tier camera system essential, or is a quick-access external display more important for your daily use?
  3. Price vs. Features: How much are you willing to spend for specific features like a telephoto lens, larger battery, or higher resolution display?

My Choice: Google Pixel Fold

While the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra's compact design and external display are compelling, I would choose the Google Pixel Fold. The larger, higher-resolution internal display, superior camera system with a telephoto lens, bigger battery, and more RAM are crucial factors for my usage. I prioritize a device that excels in productivity, photography, and offers a long-lasting battery. While the Pixel Fold is heavier and less pocketable, I find the benefits it offers in terms of overall functionality and user experience outweigh these drawbacks. The added benefit of Google's software integration and faster updates further solidifies my choice. The Razr would be a great option for someone prioritizing portability above all else, but for my needs, the Pixel Fold is a more complete and versatile device.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.