Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Google Pixel 9 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 5, 2023 September 9, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 88.47 cm³ 93.51 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.74 "/g 3.17 "/g
Weight 184.5 g 199 g
Height 170.8 mm 152.8 mm
Width 74 mm 72 mm
Thickness 7 mm 8.5 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Obsidian
  • Hazel
  • Porcelain
  • Rose Quartz

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.3 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1280 x 2856
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 86.9 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 495 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 2000 nits
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 79.82 mAh/in² 118.42 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42.95 mAh/cm³ 50.26 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 3800 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Google Tensor G4 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.92 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 730 Mali-G715 MC7

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16 21

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40 UltraGoogle Pixel 9 ProPractical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldableStandardRazr offers portability and a unique form factor; Pixel offers a traditional slab design.
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7152.8 x 72 x 8.5Razr is significantly thinner when folded but taller unfolded; Pixel is more pocketable in its standard form.
Weight (g)184.5199Razr is noticeably lighter.
Display
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDLTPO OLEDRazr's folding display allows for a larger screen in a smaller device; Pixel's display is likely more durable.
Size (inches)6.96.3Razr offers a larger main display for media consumption; Pixel's size is comfortable for one-handed use.
Resolution1080 x 26401280 x 2856Pixel boasts a sharper display with higher pixel density (495 vs 413 ppi).
Refresh Rate (Hz)165120Razr offers a smoother scrolling and gaming experience with a higher refresh rate.
Peak Brightness (nits)14003000Pixel's display is significantly brighter, ensuring better visibility outdoors.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Google Tensor G4Both are high-performance chipsets, but Tensor G4 is newer and potentially more powerful, particularly for AI tasks.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2...)Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-X4...)Tensor G4's Cortex-X4 core might offer a slight performance edge in single-core tasks.
GPUAdreno 730Mali-G715 MC7Adreno 730 generally offers stronger gaming performance compared to Mali GPUs.
RAM (GB)816Pixel has significantly more RAM, enabling better multitasking and app performance in the long run.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)1250Pixel has a much higher resolution main sensor, potentially capturing more detail.
Additional CamerasWide, Macro, SelfieWide, Telephoto, Macro, SelfiePixel offers a more versatile camera system with a dedicated telephoto lens.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@60fpsUp to 8K@30fpsPixel supports higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)38004700Pixel offers significantly longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Advantages:

  • Portability and Unique Design: The foldable design makes it extremely compact when closed.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother scrolling and gaming experience.
  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for extended use.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Camera System: Higher resolution sensors, telephoto lens, and advanced features like 8K video recording.
  • Longer Battery Life: Significantly larger battery capacity.
  • More Powerful Chipset & More RAM: Better performance for demanding tasks and future-proofing.
  • Brighter Display: Excellent outdoor visibility.
  • Longer Software Support: Pixel phones typically receive more OS updates.

Trade-offs:

  • Razr: Shorter battery life, lower resolution display, less versatile camera system, potential durability concerns with foldable display.
  • Pixel: Larger and heavier, higher price point.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Ideal for users who prioritize portability and a unique, stylish device. Suitable for users who value a large screen but want a compact phone when not in use. Good for social media, light gaming, and general use.

Google Pixel 9 Pro: Ideal for users who prioritize camera quality, performance, and battery life. Excellent for photography enthusiasts, power users, and those who need a reliable device with long-term software support. Great for demanding tasks, gaming, and content creation.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is portability and a unique design?
  2. What is your budget? The Razr falls in the "medium price" range, while the Pixel 9 Pro is "high price."
  3. What are your primary use cases? (e.g., photography, gaming, social media)

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Prioritize Portability: Razr 40 Ultra
  • Photographer/Videographer: Pixel 9 Pro
  • Power User/Gamer: Pixel 9 Pro

My Choice: Google Pixel 9 Pro

While the Razr 40 Ultra's foldable design is intriguing, the Pixel 9 Pro's superior camera system, significantly longer battery life, more powerful processor, greater RAM, brighter display and longer software support make it the better overall device for my needs. I prioritize performance, reliability, and a future-proof device. The higher price point is justified by these advantages. While I appreciate the Razr's innovative design, the practical benefits of the Pixel 9 Pro outweigh the novelty factor of a foldable phone for me personally.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.