Motorola Razr 40 Ultra vs Google Pixel 8 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 5, 2023 October 12, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 88.47 cm³ 94.83 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.74 "/g 3.32 "/g
Weight 184.5 g 187 g
Height 170.8 mm 150.5 mm
Width 74 mm 70.8 mm
Thickness 7 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design Yes No
Available Colors
  • Glacier Blue
  • Viva Magenta
  • Infinite Black
  • Peach Fuzz
  • Mint
  • Obsidian
  • Hazel
  • Rose

Display

Screen Size 6.9 " 6.2 "
Resolution 1080 x 2640 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 22:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.2 % 87.1 %
Pixel Density 413 PPI 428 PPI
Refresh Rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1400 nits
Peak Brightness 1400 nits 2000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 79.82 mAh/in² 119.02 mAh/in²
Battery Density 42.95 mAh/cm³ 48.24 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 3800 mAh 4575 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Google Tensor G3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 730 Immortalis-G715s MC10

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16 21

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Razr 40 UltraGoogle Pixel 8Practical Impact
Design
Form FactorFoldableStandardRazr offers portability and a unique form factor, Pixel 8 is a traditional slab phone.
Dimensions (mm)170.8 x 74 x 7150.5 x 70.8 x 8.9Razr is significantly thinner when folded but taller and wider when unfolded. Pixel 8 is more pocketable in its standard form.
Weight (g)184.5187Negligible weight difference.
Display
Display TypeFoldable LTPO AMOLEDOLEDRazr's folding display allows for a larger screen in a smaller device, but introduces a crease. Pixel 8 offers a robust, flat display.
Size (inches)6.96.2Larger screen real estate on the Razr for media consumption and multitasking.
Resolution1080 x 26401080 x 2400Similar sharpness, but Razr is slightly taller.
Refresh Rate (Hz)165120Smoother animations and scrolling on the Razr.
Peak Brightness (nits)14002000Pixel 8 offers significantly better outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 8+ Gen 1Google Tensor G3Both are high-end chipsets, but Tensor G3 is newer and focuses on AI capabilities. Performance differences likely minimal for average users.
CPUOcta-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510)Tensor G3 has a newer core architecture potentially offering better efficiency and performance in specific AI tasks.
GPUAdreno 730Immortalis-G715s MC10Gaming performance should be comparable, though specific benchmarks are needed for definitive conclusions.
RAM (GB)8 (in this version)8Same RAM capacity in the compared versions.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)1250Pixel 8 boasts higher resolution, potentially capturing more detail.
Ultrawide (MP)1312Similar ultrawide capabilities.
Selfie (MP)3210.8Razr has a much higher resolution selfie camera.
Video CapabilitiesUp to 4K@60fpsUp to 4K@60fpsComparable video recording capabilities on paper, but Pixel likely leverages superior computational photography for video processing.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)38004575Significantly larger battery in the Pixel 8, likely translating to longer battery life.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers portability and a larger screen in a compact form.
  • Higher Refresh Rate Display: Smoother user experience.
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: Better for video calls and self-portraits.

Google Pixel 8 Advantages:

  • Larger Battery: Longer usage time between charges.
  • Brighter Display: Enhanced outdoor visibility.
  • Newer Chipset with AI Focus: Potentially better performance and efficiency in AI tasks.
  • Superior Main Camera: Higher resolution and likely better image processing due to Google's computational photography prowess.
  • Longer Software Support: Pixel phones receive longer OS and security updates.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Razr 40 Ultra: Users who prioritize portability and a unique form factor, value a large screen for media consumption on the go, and frequently use video chat.

Google Pixel 8: Users who prioritize battery life, camera quality, consistent performance, and prolonged software support. Good for users who prefer a traditional smartphone experience.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Form Factor Preference: Do you value the portability and novelty of a foldable phone, or prefer a traditional smartphone?
  2. Battery Life Importance: Is all-day battery life a critical requirement?
  3. Camera Usage: How important is camera quality and versatility for your daily usage?

My Choice: Google Pixel 8

While the Razr 40 Ultra's foldable design is intriguing, the Pixel 8's superior battery life, brighter display, more advanced camera system, and the promise of longer software updates make it a more compelling choice for me. I prioritize practicality and long-term value, and the Pixel 8 delivers in those areas. The Tensor G3's focus on AI also aligns with my interest in emerging technologies. While the folding screen is innovative, the crease and potential durability concerns outweigh the benefits for my personal use. The significantly brighter display of the Pixel 8 is a major advantage for outdoor use.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.