Motorola One 5G Ace vs Xiaomi Poco X4 GT - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 14, 2021 June 27, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 125.14 cm³ 108.18 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.3 "/g
Weight 212 g 200 g
Height 166.1 mm 163.6 mm
Width 76.1 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 9.9 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Frosted Silver
  • Volcanic Gray
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2460
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.7 % 85.1 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 407 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 650 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 116.62 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.96 mAh/cm³ 46.96 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5080 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G610 MC6

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceXiaomi Poco X4 GTPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions166.1 × 76.1 × 9.9 mm163.6 × 74.3 × 8.9 mmPoco X4 GT is more compact and thinner, potentially more comfortable for one-handed use and pocketable.
Weight212g200gPoco X4 GT is lighter, making it less tiring to hold for extended periods.
Display
Size6.7"6.6"Motorola has a slightly larger screen, may be preferable for media consumption, but the difference is minor.
Resolution1080x24001080x2460Both have similar sharpness; the difference is negligible in daily use.
Pixel Density393 PPI407 PPIBoth offer very similar pixel density; the difference is negligible in daily use.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDIdentical display tech, similar color and viewing angles.
Refresh Rate60Hz144HzPoco X4 GT provides much smoother animations and scrolling, ideal for gaming and general use.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth phones have identical peak brightness at 0 nits. Impossible to comment on real-world impact.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm)Poco X4 GT's chipset is significantly more powerful, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score330,000820,061Poco X4 GT offers much higher performance, noticeable in demanding tasks and gaming.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G610 MC6Poco X4 GT has a more powerful GPU, delivering better graphics for gaming.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5080mAhBoth offer similar battery life; the small difference is unlikely to be significant.
Charging15W Fast Charging (Li-Ion)67W Fast Charging (Li-Polymer)Poco X4 GT charges much faster, minimizing downtime.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/1.764MP, f/1.89Poco X4 GT has higher resolution, potentially capturing more detail. Motorola has slightly wider aperture.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.216MP, f/2.45Motorola One 5G Ace has a slightly wider aperture for better low light selfies.
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.2Both phones have comparable wide-angle lens.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4Both phones have comparable macro lens.
Video4K@30fps, EIS4K@30fpsBoth record 4K video. Poco X4 GT offers 960fps slow motion video, while Motorola offers 60 fps slow motion.
Software
OSAndroid 10Android 12Poco X4 GT runs on a newer Android version, providing the latest features and security patches.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11ac802.11ax (WiFi 6)Poco X4 GT supports newer Wi-Fi 6 standard for faster speeds and better performance on compatible networks.
Bluetooth5.1 LE5.3 LEPoco X4 GT has a newer Bluetooth version with improved efficiency, stability and more features.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, GalileoA-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1)Poco X4 GT supports more satellite systems, resulting in more precise location tracking in challenging environments.
SIMSingle SIM (Nano SIM)Dual SIM Dual Standby (Nano SIM + Nano SIM)Poco X4 GT allows for use of two SIM cards at the same time.
Storage
Internal64 GB or 128 GB128 GB or 256 GBPoco X4 GT offers more base storage and a higher max option, useful for storing large media files and apps.
RAM4 GB or 6 GB8 GBPoco X4 GT has more RAM, leading to better multitasking and app performance.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone supports external storage.
Audio
Quality2 microphonesDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers, 2 microphonesPoco X4 GT provides a superior audio experience, enhancing immersion in content and clarity in voice calls.
Security
Fingerprintrear-mounted fingerprint sensorside-mounted fingerprint sensorPoco X4 GT offers faster fingerprint unlock.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass 5Poco X4 GT offers better scratch protection for the screen.
Sensors
SensorsBiometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeBiometric: Fingerprint; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope; Proximity: Ultrasonic proximity virtual, RGBPoco X4 GT offers a slightly more comprehensive sensor suite.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola One 5G Ace Advantages:

  • Slightly larger display: Useful for users who prefer larger screens for media consumption, though the difference is minimal.
  • Slightly Wider Selfie Camera Aperture: Potentially better low-light selfies

Practical Implications: The Motorola One 5G Ace offers marginal advantages in certain areas such as display size and selfie camera aperture, but falls behind in more important performance and speed.

Xiaomi Poco X4 GT Advantages:

  • Significantly more powerful processor: The Dimensity 8100 chipset offers much better performance for demanding tasks, gaming, and general responsiveness.
  • Higher refresh rate display (144Hz): Provides a dramatically smoother and more fluid user experience, especially noticeable in gaming and scrolling.
  • Much faster charging (67W): Significantly reduces charging times, offering greater convenience.
  • Newer Android OS (Android 12): Provides access to the latest features, security updates, and potentially better optimization.
  • More advanced connectivity: Supports Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3, providing faster and more reliable wireless performance.
  • Better audio: Offers Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, and stereo speakers for a more immersive audio experience.
  • More RAM and storage options: Better multitasking performance and more storage space for apps, media, and files.
  • Better build quality: Gorilla Glass 5 for more protection against scratches and impacts.

Practical Implications: The Poco X4 GT delivers a significantly better user experience in terms of performance, speed, display fluidity, charging times, and audio quality. It's more future-proof due to a newer OS and connectivity features.

Trade-offs:

  • Slightly Smaller Screen Size: The Poco X4 GT has a 0.1" smaller screen, which may be a negative factor to people who like big phones.
  • Slightly less wide aperture on main camera While Poco X4 GT has a higher resolution main camera, the Motorola One 5G Ace has a slightly wider aperture which could result in marginally better low light performance.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola One 5G Ace:

  • Ideal Users: Budget-conscious users who prioritize a large display and do not require high-end performance. Users who prioritize a slightly wider selfie camera aperture.
  • Use Cases: Basic daily tasks, social media browsing, casual media consumption, light gaming.
  • Strengths: Large display and a slightly lower price point.
  • Weaknesses: Slower performance, outdated software, slower charging, and a less smooth display.
  • Price-to-Value: Offers basic features at a low cost, but is outclassed by the Poco X4 GT in terms of performance, features and build quality

Xiaomi Poco X4 GT:

  • Ideal Users: Performance-focused users, mobile gamers, and those who value a smooth user experience. Users who like to consume media content.
  • Use Cases: High-performance gaming, multitasking, heavy app usage, streaming high-quality content, and photography.
  • Strengths: Excellent performance, smooth display, fast charging, newer Android OS, superior audio experience, better connectivity and better build quality.
  • Weaknesses: Slightly smaller screen, which may be a negative factor to people who like big phones.
  • Price-to-Value: Offers significantly better performance and a much more fluid experience for a price that can be competitive.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. How important is performance and gaming to you? If gaming and demanding apps are a priority, the Poco X4 GT is a clear winner due to its superior processor and GPU.
  2. How much do you value a smooth and responsive display? The 144Hz refresh rate of the Poco X4 GT offers a much more fluid user experience, while the Motorola One 5G Ace's 60Hz may feel comparatively sluggish.
  3. How important is fast charging? If you want your phone to charge quickly, the Poco X4 GT's 67W charging capability is significantly better than the 15W charging on the Motorola.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Budget-Conscious, Basic Use: If you prioritize price above all else, and only need a large screen for simple tasks, the Motorola One 5G Ace can be considered due to it's lower price. However, the difference in performance will be noticeable.
  • Performance and Gaming: If you value speed, smooth gaming, and fast charging, the Xiaomi Poco X4 GT is the clear recommendation. It's much better suited for demanding tasks and offers a superior experience in most areas.
  • Media Consumption: While both have IPS LCD screens, the superior audio, newer OS, faster response and higher refresh rate of the X4 GT make it better for media consumption.
  • Photography: Both phones have a decent camera setup, but the Poco X4 GT has a slight edge due to a higher megapixel main sensor and better video capabilities. Motorola One 5G Ace has a slightly wider aperture on the selfie camera, which might be preferred by people who prioritize selfies in low light.

What I would Choose and Why

Given the provided specifications, I would choose the Xiaomi Poco X4 GT.

Reasons:

  • Performance: The Dimensity 8100 chipset is a significant upgrade over the Snapdragon 750G. This translates to noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. As a user who values responsiveness and performance, this is critical.
  • Display: The 144Hz refresh rate display of the Poco X4 GT is a major advantage. The difference in smoothness compared to a 60Hz display is easily noticeable and significantly enhances the user experience during everyday use.
  • Charging Speed: The 67W fast charging is a practical benefit, allowing me to quickly top up the battery and minimizing downtime.
  • Future-Proofing: The Poco X4 GT has a newer version of Android, better Bluetooth and Wi-Fi connectivity standards, which ensures it will continue to be fast and relevant for a longer period of time.
  • Audio: The Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, and stereo speakers significantly enhance media consumption and audio clarity.
  • Build Quality: The addition of Gorilla Glass 5 adds a much needed layer of protection.

While the Motorola One 5G Ace might appeal to users looking for the absolute cheapest option and a slightly larger screen and a slightly wider selfie camera aperture, the substantial performance, display and connectivity advantages of the Poco X4 GT make it the superior choice for me. The Poco X4 GT offers a better overall experience in nearly all areas and is a worthwhile investment.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.