Motorola One 5G Ace vs vivo Y76 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 14, 2021 November 23, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 125.14 cm³ 95.82 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.76 "/g
Weight 212 g 175 g
Height 166.1 mm 163.8 mm
Width 76.1 mm 75 mm
Thickness 9.9 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Frosted Silver
  • Volcanic Gray
  • Cosmic Aurora
  • Midnight Space

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.58 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.7 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 401 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 460 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 94.70 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.96 mAh/cm³ 42.79 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4100 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 11
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a breakdown of the specifications, focusing on their real-world impact:

Design

FeatureMotorola One 5G Acevivo Y76 5GPractical Impact
Dimensions166.1 × 76.1 × 9.9 mm163.8 × 75 × 7.8 mmThe vivo Y76 5G is noticeably slimmer and slightly smaller, making it more pocketable and comfortable for one-handed use. The Motorola is bulkier.
Weight212g175gThe vivo Y76 5G is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for prolonged use. The Motorola is heavier, which some users may perceive as more solid, but less comfortable for long periods.
BuildStandardStandardBoth are standard smartphones without any special build materials.

Display

FeatureMotorola One 5G Acevivo Y76 5GPractical Impact
Size6.7"6.58"The Motorola One 5G Ace offers a slightly larger screen, which is better for media consumption. The vivo Y76 5G is slightly more compact.
Resolution1080x24001080x2408Both have similar Full HD+ resolution, offering adequate sharpness for daily use. The difference is negligible.
PPI393401Very similar pixel density; both offer a sharp and detailed display for typical viewing distances.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth have IPS LCD screens with similar viewing angles and color reproduction. No significant difference.
Refresh Rate60Hz60HzBoth have a standard 60Hz refresh rate, suitable for basic tasks but not ideal for high-fidelity gaming.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBrightness is identical, but the information is missing. This means we cannot definitively evaluate the outdoor usability of these devices based on provided information.

Performance

FeatureMotorola One 5G Acevivo Y76 5GPractical Impact
ChipsetQualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm)The vivo Y76 5G has a slight edge in performance with its newer chipset and higher AnTuTu score, better for gaming and intensive apps.
AnTuTu Score330,000389,300The vivo Y76 5G scores higher in benchmarks, indicating a smoother experience in heavy apps.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G57 MC2The vivo Y76 5G’s GPU is better in benchmarks, which translates to slightly smoother gaming experience.

Camera

FeatureMotorola One 5G Acevivo Y76 5GPractical Impact
Main Camera48MP f/1.750MP f/1.8vivo Y76 5G has marginally higher resolution, which is good for detailed shots. The wider aperture on the Motorola One 5G Ace may offer a slight advantage in low-light, but without actual images for comparison it is difficult to quantify.
Selfie Camera16MP f/2.216MP f/2.0vivo Y76 5G’s slightly wider aperture should perform better in low-light selfies.
Wide-angle Lens8MP f/2.2NoneMotorola One 5G Ace can capture wider scenes, useful for landscapes and group shots.
Portrait Mode (Depth)None2MP f/2.4The vivo Y76 5G is able to offer a depth-of-field effect for portrait mode photos.
Macro Lens2MP f/2.42MP f/2.4Similar macro lenses on both, suitable for close-up photos.
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps1080p@30fpsThe Motorola One 5G Ace offers higher resolution 4K recording, better for capturing detailed videos.
Video stabilizationEISEISBoth have electronic stabilization.
Slow MotionYes, 60 fpsNo, 30 fpsThe Motorola One 5G Ace is better for recording smooth slow motion videos with 60 fps compared to 30 fps of vivo.
FeaturesLaser autofocus (LAF), RAW, Night ModeUltra stable videoMotorola One 5G Ace offers a better array of options for photography enthusiasts whereas the vivo's ultra-stable video feature helps to take smoother videos.

Battery

FeatureMotorola One 5G Acevivo Y76 5GPractical Impact
Capacity5000mAh4100mAhMotorola One 5G Ace has a larger battery, which should provide longer battery life between charges.
Charging15W44Wvivo Y76 5G offers significantly faster charging, minimizing downtime.
TechnologyLi-IonLi-PolymerBattery type difference might not be noticeable to regular users but Li-Polymer is generally safer and has more charging cycles.
Additional Features10W rapid charger in-boxNoneMotorola includes a 10W charger, even though the phone supports 15W. vivo doesn't mention in-box charger specifications.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Here's a summary of each phone's strengths:

Motorola One 5G Ace Advantages:

  • Larger Display: Better for media consumption and general viewing.
  • Larger Battery: Longer battery life between charges.
  • 4K Video Recording: Offers higher resolution video for detailed recordings.
  • Wide-angle lens: Can capture wider scenes.
  • Laser autofocus, RAW, Night Mode: Offers more flexibility for photography enthusiasts.
  • Slow Motion Video (60fps): Records smoother slow-motion videos compared to the vivo.
  • 2 Microphones: Better audio recording quality.

vivo Y76 5G Advantages:

  • Lighter and Slimmer Design: More portable and comfortable to hold.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly reduces charging times.
  • Better Performance: Slightly faster in benchmarks, leading to a smoother experience, especially in gaming.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: Slightly better detailed shots.
  • Wider Aperture Selfie Camera: Better in low light selfies.
  • Dedicated Portrait (Depth) lens: Better portrait photography.
  • Side-mounted fingerprint sensor: Considered more modern and ergonomic.
  • Dual Sim Support: Ability to use two SIM cards simultaneously.
  • More RAM: Good for multitasking and gaming.
  • More Storage Options: Offers more storage with a 256 GB variant.
  • Gravity Sensor: For better navigation and gaming.
  • Ultra stable video: Better video stabilization.

Trade-offs:

  • The Motorola sacrifices portability and fast charging for a larger battery and a better main camera suite.
  • The vivo sacrifices battery capacity for a slimmer design, faster charging, and slightly higher performance.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola One 5G Ace:

  • Ideal Users: Those who prioritize battery life, media consumption, and a more versatile main camera system. People who want a larger display and better audio quality.
  • Use Cases:
    • Watching movies and videos on the go.
    • Long trips where battery life is crucial.
    • Casual photography with a focus on wide-angle shots.
    • Users who need to record in 4K resolution.

vivo Y76 5G:

  • Ideal Users: Users who want a sleek and lightweight phone with faster charging and slightly better performance for general use. Users who want better portrait mode and low light selfies.
  • Use Cases:
    • Frequent travelers who need a lightweight device and fast charging.
    • Users who play games on the go.
    • People who prioritize taking quick selfies.
    • Users who need dual-SIM support.

4. Decision Framework

Here are three key questions to consider when choosing between these two phones:

  1. Do you prioritize portability and fast charging, or a larger battery and display? If portability is key, go for the vivo Y76 5G. If you need a big battery, the Motorola One 5G Ace is a better choice.

  2. Are camera versatility, especially wide-angle, more important or portrait mode and low-light selfies? If you want versatile photography, the Motorola One 5G Ace is better, but for selfies and portrait photography, the vivo Y76 5G is superior.

  3. How important is having the latest software, slightly better performance and more RAM? If these are a priority, vivo Y76 5G may be a better choice.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: You travel a lot and need a reliable phone with long battery:
    • Recommendation: Motorola One 5G Ace for its larger battery.
  • Scenario 2: You frequently watch videos and record movies:
    • Recommendation: Motorola One 5G Ace for larger screen and 4K recording capabilities.
  • Scenario 3: You prioritize a sleek design, and fast charging for daily use:
    • Recommendation: vivo Y76 5G for its lighter design, and faster charging.
  • Scenario 4: You are a keen mobile photographer that wants versatility:
    • Recommendation: Motorola One 5G Ace for its wide-angle lens and better camera features.
  • Scenario 5: You are a selfie lover and you take portrait photos:
    • Recommendation: vivo Y76 5G for its better selfie camera, dedicated portrait (depth) lens, and ultra-stable video mode.
  • Scenario 6: You want better gaming performance:
    • Recommendation: vivo Y76 5G for its superior benchmarks, GPU, and RAM.
  • Scenario 7: You need dual SIM support:
    • Recommendation: vivo Y76 5G as the Motorola doesn't support dual sim.

My Choice

I would choose the vivo Y76 5G. While the Motorola One 5G Ace has appealing features like a larger battery and display, the vivo Y76 5G's combination of a lighter build, faster charging, and slightly better performance makes it more practical for my daily use. The improved performance, better portrait mode, and faster charging outweighs the benefits of the Motorola's wide-angle camera and slightly better video recording for my personal needs. Also the dual sim support is important for me, making it a more convenient choice. Although the battery is smaller, the 44W charging speeds mean I'm unlikely to experience much downtime, which I value more than a slightly larger battery with slower charging.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.