Motorola One 5G Ace vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 14, 2021 August 27, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 125.14 cm³ 129.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 2.8 "/g
Weight 212 g 271 g
Height 166.1 mm 158.2 mm
Width 76.1 mm 128.1 mm
Thickness 9.9 mm 6.4 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Frosted Silver
  • Volcanic Gray
  • Phantom Black
  • Phantom Silver
  • Phantom Green
  • Thom Browne Edition
  • Wooyoungmi Edition

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 7.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1768 x 2208
Aspect Ratio 20:9 16:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.7 % 89.7 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 374 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 76.18 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.96 mAh/cm³ 33.92 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4400 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 660

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 11
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Motorola One 5G Ace and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G, focusing on practical implications for users:

Design

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceSamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GPractical Impact
Form FactorStandardFoldableThe Z Fold3's foldable design allows for a larger screen in a smaller form factor when folded, while the One 5G Ace is a standard, non-folding phone.
Dimensions166.1 × 76.1 × 9.9 mm158.2 × 128.1 × 6.4 mm (unfolded)The Motorola is taller and thicker, while the Samsung is wider when unfolded and thinner (unfolded). Folded, the Z Fold3 is thicker than the One 5G Ace.
Weight212g271gThe Motorola is lighter and more comfortable for extended single-handed use, while the Samsung is heavier due to its foldable design and larger screen.

Display

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceSamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GPractical Impact
Size6.7"7.6" (unfolded)The Z Fold3 has a larger screen, providing more immersive media consumption and better multitasking capabilities. The One 5G Ace's screen is still large but not as expansive.
Resolution1080x24001768x2208The Z Fold3's higher resolution results in sharper text and images, while the One 5G Ace is still sharp for most users.
PPI393374Both phones have similar pixel density, meaning both will appear quite sharp to the eye, with the Motorola having a slight edge.
TechnologyIPS LCDUnspecifiedThe Motorola One 5G Ace utilizes an IPS LCD, which may not offer the same color vibrancy or contrast as an OLED display (commonly found in flagships) which the Z Fold 3 likely has.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzThe Z Fold3's 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations, making the user experience feel more fluid and responsive.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth lack specified brightness levels, making it difficult to assess outdoor visibility.

Performance

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceSamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GPractical Impact
ChipsetSnapdragon 750G 5G (8nm)Snapdragon 888 5G (5nm)The Z Fold3's flagship-level chipset offers significantly better performance for demanding tasks, such as gaming and video editing. The One 5G Ace's chipset is adequate for everyday tasks and some light gaming.
AnTuTu Score330,000898,700The Z Fold3 has much higher benchmark scores, reflecting its superior processing power.
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 660The Z Fold3's GPU provides better graphics performance, suitable for graphically intensive games and applications.

Camera

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceSamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GPractical Impact
Standard Camera48MP f/1.7, 0.8µm12MP f/1.8, 1/1.76" Sony IMX555, 1.8µmThe Motorola has a higher megapixel count for the main sensor, however the Z Fold3's larger pixel size and Sony sensor often translate into better low-light performance and detail despite lower megapixels.
Selfie Camera16MP f/2.2, 1.12µm10MP f/2.2, 1/3.2" Sony IMX374, 1.22µmThe Motorola has a higher megapixel count for the selfie camera, but the Z Fold3 has slightly larger pixels, potentially providing better low light and clarity in selfies.
Telephoto LensNone12MP f/2.4, 1.0µmThe Z Fold3 has a dedicated telephoto lens, allowing for optical zoom and better quality when zooming in on subjects.
Wide Angle Lens8MP f/2.2, 1.12µm13MP f/2.2, 1/3.06" Sony IMX258, 1.12µmThe Z Fold3 has a higher megapixel wide-angle lens, likely resulting in more detail captured in wide angle shots.
Macro Lens2MP f/2.4, 1.75µmNoneThe Motorola includes a macro lens for close-up photography, which the Z Fold3 lacks.
VideoUp to 4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p@60fps (EIS)Up to 4K@60fps (HDR, EIS), 1080p@240fps (HDR, EIS), 720p@960fps (HDR, EIS)The Z Fold3 offers better video recording capabilities, including higher frame rate in 4K, 1080p and additional HDR, plus much slower slow-motion recording.
DXOMark ScoresNot TestedMobile: 120, Photo: 129, Video: 105; Selfie: 83, Photo: 79, Video: 89The Samsung Z Fold 3 has professional grade DXOMark scores for its cameras, while the Motorola has not been tested and may not have the same performance.
FeaturesDigital zoom, Triple camera, EIS, Autofocus, Touch focus, PDAF, LAF, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, RAW, Night ModeDigital zoom, Optical zoom, Triple camera, EIS, OIS, Autofocus, Touch focus, Manual focus, Laser AF, PDAF, LAF, Dual front camera, Under display camera, Continuous shooting, Geotagging, Panorama, HDR, Face detection, White balance settings, ISO settings, Exposure compensation, Scene mode, Self-timer, RAW, Night ModeSamsung Z Fold 3 has optical zoom and OIS for better zoom and stability, plus dual front camera and under display camera for enhanced selfie options.

Battery

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceSamsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5GPractical Impact
Capacity5000mAh4400mAhThe Motorola has a larger battery, potentially providing longer battery life than the Samsung Z Fold3 under similar usage conditions.
Charging15W fast charging25W fast chargingThe Z Fold3 charges faster, meaning it will require less time to recharge.
Features10W rapid charger in-boxBypass Charging, Reverse charging, Wireless charging 15W, Reverse wireless charging 9WThe Z Fold3 has more versatile charging features, including wireless charging, reverse wireless charging, and bypass charging while gaming. The Motorola includes a 10W in-box charger, but is a lower wattage.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Here's a breakdown of the primary advantages of each phone, along with their implications:

Motorola One 5G Ace Advantages:

  • Lighter and More Comfortable: Significantly lighter at 212g, it is easier to handle for long periods.
  • Larger Battery: Its 5000 mAh battery offers potentially longer battery life.
  • Macro Lens: Includes a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots.
  • Potentially Lower Price: Given its mid-range specifications, the One 5G Ace is likely to be more budget-friendly than the flagship Z Fold 3.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Advantages:

  • Foldable Design: Offers a unique user experience with a large display that can be folded for portability.
  • Superior Display: Boasts a higher resolution, 120Hz refresh rate, and an assumed AMOLED display resulting in sharper visuals, smoother animations and more vibrant colours.
  • Much Faster Performance: The Snapdragon 888 offers significantly better performance for gaming and demanding tasks.
  • Advanced Camera System: Features a telephoto lens, better video quality, and higher rated scores.
  • Faster Charging and Wireless Options: Supports faster 25W wired charging, wireless charging, and reverse wireless charging.
  • More RAM and Storage: 12 GB of RAM and up to 512GB of storage.
  • Advanced Connectivity: Newer WiFi, Bluetooth, and GPS with more options.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • Motorola One 5G Ace: Sacrifices high performance, a premium display, and a versatile camera for affordability and ease of use.
  • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G: Is more expensive, heavier, and might have a shorter battery life despite faster charging.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Here's a breakdown of who might benefit most from each phone:

Motorola One 5G Ace Ideal User:

  • Budget-Conscious User: Someone seeking a 5G-enabled phone at a more affordable price.
  • Everyday User: Ideal for general use, such as browsing, social media, and casual gaming.
  • Users Prioritizing Battery Life: Individuals needing extended battery life over high performance or features.
  • Users Who value Macro Photography: Someone who enjoys close-up shots and would find a macro lens useful.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G Ideal User:

  • Tech Enthusiasts: Those who want cutting-edge technology and a unique user experience.
  • Productivity-Focused User: Ideal for users needing a large screen for multitasking, document editing, and presentations.
  • Mobile Gamers: Perfect for gamers who require high performance and smooth graphics.
  • Multimedia Consumers: Users who enjoy watching high-quality videos, movies and other media on a larger and high refresh rate display.
  • Those Needing Advanced Camera Features: Users who value top-tier camera capabilities, including zoom, high-quality video, and selfie performance.

Specific Use Cases:

  • Motorola One 5G Ace:

    • Long commutes for media consumption
    • Daily driver for social media, web browsing and communication
    • Casual photography with a macro focus
  • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G:

    • On-the-go productivity and multitasking
    • Mobile gaming and entertainment
    • Professional photography and videography

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Motorola One 5G Ace offers good value for budget-conscious consumers who don't require high-end features.
  • The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G is a premium device with a higher price tag, targeting users who demand top-tier performance, display, and a unique form factor.

4. Decision Framework

Here are three key questions buyers should consider:

  1. What is my primary use case for a smartphone? (e.g., gaming, productivity, photography, social media, or basic daily tasks)
  2. How important is portability and battery life compared to performance and display quality?
  3. What is my budget, and how much am I willing to spend on a premium smartphone?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1 (Budget Focused): If your budget is limited, and you mainly use your phone for basic tasks, the Motorola One 5G Ace will serve you well.
  • Scenario 2 (Balanced Usage): If you want solid performance for daily tasks, a larger screen and longer battery, while still remaining budget-conscious, the One 5G Ace remains a good option.
  • Scenario 3 (Performance & Premium Experience): If you prioritize cutting-edge technology, seamless multitasking, gaming, professional camera capabilities, and a unique display, and are okay with the premium price tag and weight, then the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G is the better choice.
  • Scenario 4 (Unique Form Factor): If having a foldable phone with a tablet-like experience is important to you, regardless of cost, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G is the only option in this comparison.

My Choice

If I were making the decision, I would personally choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 5G.

Here's why:

While the Motorola One 5G Ace is a very competent phone and may offer a better price point and battery life for some people, the Z Fold 3 provides a superior experience in almost every other metric, particularly if the unique folding form factor is something that I am interested in.

The Snapdragon 888 chipset offers significantly higher performance, which would allow me to play high-end mobile games and run demanding applications smoothly. The 120Hz refresh rate AMOLED display (even if not officially stated, it is likely using an AMOLED screen) would give me a much more fluid experience, whether I'm browsing, gaming, or watching media. Additionally, the more comprehensive camera system and faster charging are things that I value. The fact that it has much more ram also guarantees a smoother multi-tasking experience.

While the Z Fold3 is more expensive and heavier, for my specific use case, it is well worth the additional cost and trade-offs. The unique experience of a foldable display and the premium features are compelling enough to justify the added expense.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.