Smartphone Comparison: Motorola One 5G Ace vs. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Motorola One 5G Ace | Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm | 163.3 x 77.9 x 8.9 mm | Motorola is slightly taller and thicker, while the Samsung is wider; the Motorola will have a larger overall volume, while the Samsung may be slightly more pocketable. |
| Weight | 212g | 228g | Motorola is lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use, while the Samsung might feel more premium. |
| Build | Unknown Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ | Samsung's screen will be more resistant to scratches and drops. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.7" | 6.8" | Negligible difference in screen size; both offer a large display for media consumption. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1440x3088 | Samsung's higher resolution provides a noticeably sharper and more detailed image. |
| Pixel Density | 393 PPI | 500 PPI | Samsung's higher PPI results in sharper text and images; less pixelation. |
| Technology | IPS LCD | AMOLED | Samsung's AMOLED offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency for dark themes. |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 120Hz | Samsung's 120Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling, animations, and an overall more fluid user experience. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 1750 nits | Samsung offers dramatically better outdoor visibility and readability in bright sunlight. The Motorola's brightness value is missing. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 750G (8 nm) | Exynos 2200 (4 nm) - Europe | Samsung's newer chipset provides significantly faster processing, better graphics, and more efficient power management. The difference in nm process size indicates that the Samsung chipset is more efficient. |
| AnTuTu Score | 330,000 | 1,023,311 | Samsung's higher score indicates significantly faster performance for apps, multitasking, and gaming, and generally future-proofing. |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Xclipse 920 - Europe | Samsung's GPU is significantly more powerful, providing better gaming performance and graphics quality. |
| Camera | |||
| Main Camera | 48MP, f/1.7 | 108MP, f/1.8 | Samsung's main camera offers much higher resolution, resulting in more detail in photos, though the Motorola has a slightly wider aperture. |
| Telephoto | None | 12MP, f/2.4 + 12MP, f/4.9 | Samsung offers optical zoom capabilities, allowing users to get closer to subjects without losing image quality. |
| Wide Angle | 8MP, f/2.2 | 12.2MP, f/2.2 | Samsung's wide-angle camera offers higher resolution. |
| Macro | 2MP, f/2.4 | None | Motorola offers a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots. |
| Selfie | 16MP, f/2.2 | 40MP, f/2.2 | Samsung's selfie camera offers significantly higher resolution for more detailed selfies. |
| Video | Up to 4K@30fps, EIS | Up to 8K@24fps, EIS, HDR | Samsung offers higher video recording resolution, better dynamic range, and potentially better stabilization, and 960fps slow-mo vs 60fps slow-mo. |
| DxOMark | N/A | Mobile: 131, Selfie: 135 | Samsung has a verified score indicating its camera's superior performance; no data for Motorola. |
| Camera Features | Limited | Extensive | Samsung has more features, including optical zoom and stabilization. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both phones offer comparable battery capacity, suggesting similar battery life, assuming similar usage patterns, screen size/type. |
| Charging | 15W Fast Charging | 45W Fast Charging | Samsung's faster charging significantly reduces the time spent plugged in; Motorola's in-box charger is 10W, slower than it's advertised charging speed. |
| Features | 10W charger in-box | Bypass Charging, Wireless Charging 15W, Reverse charging, Reverse wireless charging | Samsung's additional features are very useful in real-world situations, while Motorola's is relatively basic. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 10 | Android 12 (Upgradable to 16) | Samsung has a newer OS and longer update support, offering more features, performance improvements, and security patches. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 5 (ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (ax) | Samsung offers faster Wi-Fi speeds, lower latency, and better performance in congested networks. |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 | Samsung has a newer version with more features, better efficiency, and lower latency. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, L1+L5 | Samsung has more comprehensive satellite support resulting in better location accuracy. |
| SIM | Single SIM | Dual SIM (Nano + eSIM) | Samsung allows using two SIM cards or an eSIM simultaneously, very useful for international travelers or people with multiple numbers. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 64 GB or 128 GB | 128 GB/256 GB/512 GB/1024 GB | Samsung offers much more storage, which is essential for users with extensive media collections, apps, or high-resolution photos/videos. |
| RAM | 4 GB or 6 GB | 8 GB or 12 GB | Samsung's higher RAM offers better multitasking performance and smoother operation with demanding apps/games. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither phone allows for expandable storage, so choosing the correct storage option is important. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | 2 microphones | Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Noise cancellation microphone, Stereo Speakers | Samsung's audio features provide a better multimedia experience, with superior sound quality. |
| Security | |||
| Features | Basic Fingerprint Sensor | Basic Fingerprint Sensor | Both have a basic sensor for biometric security. |
| Sensors | Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Barometer, Hall, Geomagnetic | Samsung has additional environmental sensors, providing more features and information. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Motorola One 5G Ace Advantages:
- Lighter: Significantly lighter weight makes it more comfortable for extended use.
- Macro Lens: Includes a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots.
- Lower cost: This is implied, based on the other specs.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED panel with higher resolution, higher pixel density, 120Hz refresh rate, and drastically higher brightness offers a much better viewing experience.
- Significantly Higher Performance: Much faster processor and GPU results in superior app performance, multitasking, and gaming.
- Advanced Camera System: Offers higher resolution main and selfie cameras, telephoto lenses with optical zoom, and superior video recording capabilities.
- Faster Charging & Additional Battery Features: Offers much faster wired charging, wireless charging, and reverse wireless charging.
- Newer OS: Ships with a more recent version of Android and provides longer update support.
- Advanced Connectivity: Supports newer Wi-Fi standards, better Bluetooth, and better GPS.
- More Storage & RAM Options: Offers a significantly larger range of storage options and more RAM for heavy users.
- Better audio: Offers Dolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo Speakers and noise cancellation microphone.
- Better screen protection: Uses Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ for screen protection.
- More sensors: Includes additional environmental sensors like a barometer.
Significant Trade-offs:
- Motorola One 5G Ace: The main trade-off is performance and screen quality. While the Motorola offers a lighter build and a macro lens, it significantly lags behind the Samsung in almost every other key area.
- Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G: The trade-off is the higher price, weight, and larger size. It is a premium device, so the cost is significantly higher, and it is heavier than the Motorola.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Motorola One 5G Ace:
- Ideal User: Price-sensitive users who need basic smartphone functions, are not heavy gamers, and do not prioritize photography, prefer a lighter device.
- Use Cases: Basic web browsing, social media, calls, and messaging, general usage where absolute top performance and image quality are not requirements.
- Price-to-Value: A budget-friendly option for basic usage.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G:
- Ideal User: Power users who need top-tier performance, a high-quality display, advanced camera capabilities, and are willing to pay a premium for it.
- Use Cases: Professional photography and videography, heavy gaming, intensive multitasking, users who consume a lot of multimedia, and users who value all the newest technological advancements in their smartphone.
- Price-to-Value: Premium features justify the high price for demanding users; may not be worth the cost if high performance features aren't utilized often.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions:
- What is your budget? If you have a strict budget and need just the basics, the Motorola may fit. If you want premium features, the Samsung fits.
- How important are performance and the display? If you prioritize gaming, smooth multitasking, and an outstanding visual experience, the Samsung is the clear choice.
- What are your photography needs? For basic, casual photography, the Motorola is adequate. For high-quality photos, video recording and optical zoom, the Samsung is far superior.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Budget-Conscious User: If you're on a tight budget and primarily need a phone for basic tasks, the Motorola One 5G Ace is the more affordable option. Be aware of the compromises, though.
- Performance Enthusiast: If you need the best possible performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G is the clear winner.
- Mobile Photographer/Videographer: If you prioritize camera quality and features, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G's superior camera system makes it a better choice.
- Everyday User: If you want a decent phone for everyday use, and need a balance of price and features, the Motorola One 5G Ace will function. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G will offer a much more premium experience at a higher cost.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G. The massive difference in display quality and performance is a dealbreaker for me. As someone who consumes a lot of media and occasionally games on my phone, the S22 Ultra's superior AMOLED display with its 120Hz refresh rate, much better processor/GPU, and more versatile camera system makes it a much better investment for my needs, despite the significantly higher cost. The added features like fast charging, the latest Android OS, and wireless charging are the deciding factors. Although I prefer a lighter phone, I would accept the added weight for the overall benefits that the S22 Ultra offers.
