Motorola One 5G Ace vs Samsung Galaxy M52 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 14, 2021 October 3, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 125.14 cm³ 92.83 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.87 "/g
Weight 212 g 173 g
Height 166.1 mm 164.2 mm
Width 76.1 mm 76.4 mm
Thickness 9.9 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Frosted Silver
  • Volcanic Gray
  • White
  • Icy Blue
  • Blazing Black

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.7 % 86.4 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.96 mAh/cm³ 53.86 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 642L

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 11
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Motorola One 5G Ace and Samsung Galaxy M52 5G, focusing on practical implications for the user:

Design

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceSamsung Galaxy M52 5GPractical Impact
Dimensions166.1 × 76.1 × 9.9 mm164.2 × 76.4 × 7.4 mmM52 is thinner and slightly shorter; Ace is bulkier. M52 is more pocketable.
Weight212g173gM52 is significantly lighter, more comfortable for extended use.

Display

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceSamsung Galaxy M52 5GPractical Impact
Size6.7"6.7"Both phones offer the same screen real estate.
Resolution1080x24001080x2400Both offer sharp visuals.
PPI393393Both have similar pixel density, sharpness.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDM52 has superior contrast, deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, better power efficiency for dark themes.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzM52 offers smoother scrolling, animations, and better gaming experience.
Brightness0 nits800 nitsM52 is significantly brighter, much better in sunlight. Ace brightness is unknown, potentially causing outdoor visibility issues.

Performance

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceSamsung Galaxy M52 5GPractical Impact
ChipsetSnapdragon 750GSnapdragon 778GM52 offers noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score330,000589,200M52 scores much higher, reflecting a big difference in performance.
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 642LM52's GPU allows for higher frame rates and better graphics in games.

Camera

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceSamsung Galaxy M52 5GPractical Impact
Main Camera48MP, f/1.764MP, f/1.8M52 has higher resolution and better detail; Ace has slightly better low-light due to slightly wider aperture.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.232MP, f/2.2M52 captures more detailed selfies.
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.2NoneAce can capture wide shots; M52 lacks ultrawide camera.
Portrait CameraNone5MP, f/2.4M52 can take dedicated portrait shots with background blur.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4NoneAce can take close-up shots; M52 lacks macro lens.
Wide Angle + MacroNone13MP, f/2.2M52 has combined functionality of wide and macro shots.
Video4K@30fps, EIS4K@30fpsBoth offer 4K recording; M52 has a higher slow-motion fps
Camera FeaturesPDAF, LAF, RAW, Night Mode, etc.4K Video, Digital zoom, HDR, etc.Both have key features. Ace has Phase and Laser Autofocus, RAW; M52 has 4K video.

Battery

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceSamsung Galaxy M52 5GPractical Impact
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth phones offer similar battery life.
Charging15W25WM52 charges faster, reducing downtime.
Features10W in-box chargerNoneAce has an in-box charger. M52 doesn't specify.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola One 5G Ace Advantages:

  • Dedicated Wide-Angle and Macro Lens: Offers more camera versatility with a dedicated wide-angle and macro lens.
  • Phase and Laser Autofocus: Potentially faster and more accurate autofocus.
  • RAW Photo Capture: Gives users greater control over post-processing of photos.
  • Slightly Wider Aperture on Main Camera: Might perform marginally better in low-light scenarios.
  • In-Box Charger: Includes a charger in the box.

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED screen with 120Hz refresh rate offers much better visuals, smoother animations, and higher brightness.
  • Significantly Faster Performance: Much more powerful chipset handles demanding tasks and gaming more efficiently.
  • Lighter and Thinner Design: More comfortable to hold and pocket.
  • Faster Charging: 25W charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • Higher Resolution Cameras: Higher-resolution main and front cameras capture more detailed images.
  • Better WiFi: Supports WiFi 6 for faster and more efficient network connectivity.
  • More RAM: Higher RAM options provide smoother multitasking and app performance.
  • More Satellites Supported for GPS: For improved location accuracy and tracking.
  • Later Android Version: Ships with a newer version and has better update support.

Trade-offs:

  • Motorola: The Ace compromises on display and overall performance for slightly better low-light capability, wide-angle and macro camera, and in-box charger.
  • Samsung: The M52 lacks a dedicated macro lens, and wide-angle camera, and the charger is not included.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola One 5G Ace Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users who want the flexibility of wide-angle and macro photography, and do not need the most processing power.
  • Users who prioritize battery life and do not mind slower charging speeds.
  • Users who prefer RAW photo capturing capabilities, along with PDAF and LAF.
  • Users who prefer to have a charger in the box.

Samsung Galaxy M52 5G Ideal User:

  • Users who prioritize display quality for media consumption.
  • Mobile gamers or users who need snappy performance for multitasking.
  • Users who prefer lighter and thinner phones.
  • Users who value faster charging.
  • Users who take lots of selfies or portrait mode pictures.
  • Users who prefer newer software.

Use Cases:

  • Motorola Ace: Good for casual photography, day-to-day use, and longer battery life.
  • Samsung M52: Ideal for mobile gaming, streaming, photography with better clarity, and multitasking.

4. Decision Framework

Here are 3 key questions buyers should consider:

  1. How much do you value display quality? If a vibrant, smooth, and bright screen is important, the Samsung M52 is a clear winner.
  2. Do you need the absolute best performance for gaming/multitasking? The M52's significantly more powerful processor is the better choice.
  3. Are versatile camera lenses or better photo-editing tools important? The Ace offers wide-angle, macro lens, PDAF, LAF and RAW photo support. The M52 offers more detail on its main and selfie camera.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Casual Use & Photography: If you prioritize a lower cost phone and want a charger included, and wide and macro lenses, the Ace is good choice, with a compromise on display and performance.
  • Scenario 2: Performance & Multimedia: If you need the best display, fast performance, and enjoy gaming, the Samsung M52 5G is a better option.
  • Scenario 3: Budget-Conscious Gaming: The M52 is a great option for those seeking a gaming capable phone with an excellent display.

My Choice and Why

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G.

My reasoning is based on the following key factors:

  • Superior Display: The AMOLED screen with a 120Hz refresh rate is a huge advantage for my use, offering better visuals, more enjoyable experience while browsing, and content consumption.
  • Much Better Performance: The Snapdragon 778G provides a significantly smoother and more responsive experience, which is essential for multitasking, app loading and gaming. The performance difference is considerable based on the AnTuTu scores.
  • Lighter and Thinner Design: This makes the phone more comfortable to hold and pocket, which is important for daily use.
  • Better Camera Quality: While the Ace has more lenses, the M52's higher resolution main and selfie cameras capture more detailed images which is beneficial for social media usage and personal photographs.
  • Faster Charging: The 25W charging helps me reduce downtime while I use my phone.

While I appreciate the Ace's wide angle and macro lens, PDAF, and LAF, I value the overall experience offered by the M52. The combination of a superior display, better performance, and faster charging makes the M52 a more compelling choice for my personal preferences and use cases. The lack of an in-box charger is easily overcome, making the M52 the better choice for most users seeking a well-rounded mid-range smartphone.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.