Motorola One 5G Ace vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 14, 2021 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 125.14 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 212 g 213 g
Height 166.1 mm 161.1 mm
Width 76.1 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 9.9 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Frosted Silver
  • Volcanic Gray
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.7 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.96 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Motorola One 5G Ace vs. Samsung Galaxy A55

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the key specifications, highlighting their practical implications for user experience:

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceSamsung Galaxy A55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions166.1 × 76.1 × 9.9 mm161.1 × 77.4 × 8.2 mmThe Motorola is taller and thicker, while the A55 is wider but thinner. The A55 will likely feel more compact in hand.
Weight212g213gVirtually identical weight; both will feel substantial.
Display
Size6.7"6.6"Motorola has a slightly larger screen, which is good for media consumption, but not significantly so.
Resolution1080x24001080x2340Both are Full HD, offering similar sharpness for everyday use.
PPI393390Both have similar pixel density; sharpness will be indistinguishable to most users.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDAMOLED provides superior contrast, deeper blacks, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency for dark modes compared to IPS LCD.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzA 120Hz refresh rate on the Samsung results in smoother scrolling and animations compared to 60Hz.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsNo information available on peak brightness.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm)Exynos 1480 (4 nm)The A55's Exynos chip is significantly more powerful, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
Antutu Score330,000713,393The A55 is much faster in benchmarks, indicating superior overall performance.
GPUAdreno 619Xclipse 530A55 has better graphics processing for gaming and other graphics-intensive tasks
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/1.7, 0.80 µm50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.56", 1.00 µmA55 has a slightly higher resolution and larger sensor size which should result in better low light performance.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.2, 1.12 µm32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", 0.80 µmA55 has a much higher-resolution front camera for sharper selfies.
Wide Angle8MP, f/2.2, 1.12 µm13MP, f/2.2, 1/3.06", 1.12 µmA55 has a higher resolution for wider shots.
Macro Camera2MP, f/2.4, 1.75 µm5MP, f/2.4, 1.12 µmA55 has a higher resolution for better macro shots.
VideoUp to 4K@30fps with EISUp to 4K@30fps with EIS, OISBoth record 4K but the A55 includes OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for steadier footage.
DxOMarkN/A108 (Mobile)A55 camera is significantly better based on DxOMark scoring.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth have similar battery capacity for all-day usage, assuming similar software and usage patterns.
Charging15W25WA55 charges significantly faster, saving time waiting for the device to be usable.
Charger Included10W in-box chargerNo charger includedMotorola includes a slower charger in the box, saving on extra expense.
Software
OSAndroid 10Android 14A55 has a more recent version of Android, offering new features and security patches.
Connectivity
Wi-FiUp to 802.11acUp to WiFi 6 (802.11ax)A55 supports newer, faster Wi-Fi standards.
Bluetooth5.15.3A55 has newer, more efficient Bluetooth version.
SIMSingle Nano SIMDual Nano SIM + eSIMA55 has dual SIM capabilities and eSIM for more flexibility.
Storage & Memory
Internal Storage64GB/128GB128GB/256GBA55 offers more internal storage options.
RAM4GB/6GB8GB/12GBA55 has more RAM for improved multitasking.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone supports expandable storage.
Audio
Audio Quality2 MicrophonesDolby Atmos, Hi-Res Audio, Stereo SpeakersA55 has a better audio experience, featuring enhanced sound features, and stereo speakers.
Security
SecurityRear fingerprint sensorBasic fingerprint sensorBoth devices have similar fingerprint security sensors.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass VictusA55 offers superior screen protection against scratches and drops.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola One 5G Ace Advantages:

  • Slightly Larger Display: The 6.7" screen offers a bit more screen real estate, better for media consumption.
  • Included Charger: Comes with a 10W rapid charger in the box.
  • Lower initial price: Older phone usually means a lower price.

Samsung Galaxy A55 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology delivers much better image quality with deeper blacks and vibrant colors.
  • Higher Refresh Rate: 120Hz refresh rate makes scrolling and animations much smoother.
  • Significantly Faster Performance: Exynos 1480 chipset provides a much better overall performance experience.
  • Better Camera System: Higher resolution and more capable sensors, plus OIS for video. DxOMark scores are higher.
  • Faster Charging: 25W charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • More Modern Features: Newer version of Android, advanced connectivity, and dual SIM + eSIM.
  • Better Audio Quality: Stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos and Hi-Res Audio
  • Better Build Quality: Better screen protection with Gorilla Glass Victus
  • More RAM and Storage: Higher RAM options and base storage of 128GB, higher internal storage up to 256GB

Trade-offs:

  • The Motorola One 5G Ace's main advantage is its potential lower cost, trading off performance and features for affordability. The Samsung Galaxy A55 comes at a higher price but has a lot more to offer.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola One 5G Ace Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious buyers: Users primarily focused on affordability over performance.
  • Light users: Those who mainly use their phone for browsing, social media, and basic tasks.
  • Users who prioritize bigger screen: For those who want larger screen.
  • Users who don't need advanced performance: For users who are not heavy gamers.

Use Cases: Basic web browsing, social media, casual media consumption, and calls/messaging.

Samsung Galaxy A55 Ideal User:

  • Performance-focused users: Those who need a responsive phone for gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps.
  • Photography enthusiasts: Users who value camera quality and features for both photos and videos.
  • Media Consumers: Users who consume a lot of video content and want a vibrant display with a smooth refresh rate.
  • Users who want advanced features: Those who want the latest software, connectivity, and advanced audio features.
  • Users who don't need expandable storage: For users who are okay with limited storage, as neither of these phones come with expandable storage capabilities.

Use Cases: Mobile gaming, photography, videography, heavy app usage, media creation and consumption, and for users who need the most out of their phone.

4. Decision Framework

Here are three key questions a buyer should consider:

  1. Budget: What's your maximum budget? If cost is your primary concern, the Motorola One 5G Ace may be suitable.
  2. Performance Needs: What are your primary uses? For demanding tasks, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is the better choice.
  3. Display Preferences: How important is display quality? If you value vibrant colors and smooth refresh rates, the A55's AMOLED display is preferable.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Basic User on a Tight Budget
    • Recommendation: Motorola One 5G Ace. It's a more economical choice for basic phone tasks.
  • Scenario 2: Performance-Oriented User
    • Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A55. It offers superior performance, a better camera, and a better display.
  • Scenario 3: Casual User Who Values Display
    • Recommendation: Samsung Galaxy A55. The AMOLED display and 120Hz refresh rate provide a noticeably better viewing experience.

My Choice and Why

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A55. Although it comes at a higher price, the improvements it offers in nearly every aspect of the user experience are considerable.

The A55's AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate offers a much more fluid and enjoyable visual experience, which is crucial for any modern smartphone user. The significantly faster processor makes the device smoother, more responsive, and more capable of handling demanding apps or games. The improved camera system, complete with OIS for video, allows for capturing better photos and videos. Additionally, faster charging means less downtime waiting for the device to charge, and the extra storage and ram make sure the phone is future proof and will last much longer.

While the Motorola One 5G Ace might be adequate for basic tasks and might be more affordable, the Samsung Galaxy A55 provides a vastly superior overall experience for the reasons stated above. I value performance, camera quality, display and overall user experience over cost. Therefore, the Samsung Galaxy A55 provides much better value for money if the initial cost is not your main concern.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.