Smartphone Comparison: Motorola One 5G Ace vs. Samsung Galaxy A52
1. Specifications Comparison
Feature | Motorola One 5G Ace | Samsung Galaxy A52 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Dimensions | 166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm | A52 is more compact and slimmer, likely more comfortable in hand. Ace is taller and thicker. |
Weight | 212g | 189g | A52 is significantly lighter, more comfortable for extended use. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.7" | 6.5" | Ace has slightly larger screen, better for media consumption. |
Resolution | 1080 x 2400 | 1080 x 2400 | Both offer the same level of sharpness, no practical difference in image clarity. |
PPI | 393 | 407 | Similar pixel density, both displays will appear sharp. |
Technology | IPS LCD | AMOLED | A52 has superior display, offering better blacks, contrast, and color vibrancy. Better for dark mode and HDR content. |
Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 90Hz | A52 offers smoother scrolling and animations. |
Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Peak brightness is identical, but no data is available for actual brightness. |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) | Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) | 750G offers slightly better performance and 5G. Both good for everyday tasks, moderate gaming. |
AnTuTu Score | 330,000 | 341,212 | Similar performance, both handle multitasking and modern apps with ease. |
GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 618 | 619 offers slight graphical performance benefit for gaming but negligible real-world differences |
Camera | |||
Rear Camera (Main) | 48MP, f/1.7 | 64MP, f/1.8, 1/1.7", Sony IMX682 | A52 has higher resolution sensor, potentially better detail capture, and larger sensor for better light sensitivity. |
Selfie Camera | 16MP, f/2.2 | 32MP, f/2.2, 1/2.8", Sony IMX616 | A52 selfie camera is higher resolution, ideal for detailed and well lit selfies. |
Wide Angle Lens | 8MP, f/2.2 | 12MP, f/2.2 | A52 captures more detailed wide angle shots. |
Portrait Mode | Not Present | 5MP, f/2.4 | A52 has dedicated depth sensor for better portrait mode photos. |
Macro Lens | 2MP, f/2.4 | 5MP, f/2.4 | A52 has more detailed macro capabilities |
Video | 4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p@60fps (EIS) | 4K@30fps (EIS), 1080p@60fps (EIS) | Similar video recording quality. A52 offers additional OIS |
Video Stabilisation | EIS | OIS, EIS, Ultra Stable Video | A52 provides more advanced video stabilization leading to less shaky videos. |
Features | PDAF, LAF, RAW | OIS, Continuous Autofocus, 4K Video | Ace features more advanced autofocus, while A52 adds more advanced video stabilization and features. |
Battery | |||
Capacity | 5000mAh | 4500mAh | Ace has a larger battery, potentially longer battery life. |
Charging | 15W | 25W | A52 charges faster, reducing downtime. |
Charging Features | 10W Charger in Box | QC2.0, AFC | A52 has faster charging support while the Ace has a slightly faster charger in the box, but limited by the phone's 15W capability |
Software | |||
Operating System | Android 10 | Android 11, upgradable to 14 | A52 comes with newer version of Android and will receive updates to Android 14. Ace likely won't receive more updates |
Connectivity | |||
WiFi | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | Both have similar WiFi connectivity for wireless internet usage |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 | Newer Bluetooth for Ace, but similar real world performance in everyday usage |
GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | A52 provides a higher likelihood of GPS lock with additional satellite support, whereas Ace has SUPL for quick connection |
SIM | Single SIM | Dual SIM Dual Standby | A52 supports two sim cards at the same time for dual line functionality |
Storage | |||
Internal Storage | 64 GB or 128 GB | 128 GB or 256 GB | A52 offers 256GB for those who need it while the Ace only offers a 128GB storage option |
RAM | 4 GB or 6 GB | 4 GB or 6 GB or 8 GB | A52 offers the option for 8GB RAM, better for multitasking and gaming |
Expandable Storage | No | No | No option to expand internal storage on either device. |
Audio | |||
Audio Quality | 2 microphones | Dolby Atmos, Stereo Speakers | A52 has stereo speakers and enhanced audio technology for more immersive audio. |
Security | |||
Fingerprint Sensor | Rear-mounted | In-display | Both feature fingerprint sensors for secure and fast device unlocking |
Build Quality | |||
Screen Protection | Unknown | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | A52 is likely more durable due to Corning Gorilla Glass 5 protection. |
Sensors | |||
Sensors | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope | Fingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Hall, Geomagnetic | Ace has a compass while the A52 has Hall and Geomagnetic sensors for different types of measurements. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Motorola One 5G Ace Advantages:
- Larger Battery: 5000mAh vs 4500mAh in the A52 offering better battery life for users who need extended usage.
- Slightly Newer Chipset: Snapdragon 750G provides better 5G connectivity and marginal performance gains.
- More advanced autofocus: Features PDAF and LAF for better autofocus in photos and videos
Samsung Galaxy A52 Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED screen provides better color accuracy, deeper blacks, and better overall viewing experience.
- Smoother Refresh Rate: 90Hz display allows for smoother animations and scrolling.
- Better Cameras: Higher resolution sensors, additional depth sensor and optical image stabilization give A52 more flexibility for camera usage.
- Faster Charging: 25W charging reduces downtime, even with slightly smaller battery size.
- Stereo Speakers with Dolby Atmos: Enhanced audio experience for media consumption.
- Dual SIM Support: Ability to use two SIM cards simultaneously, convenient for travelers or users with dual lines.
- More Software Support: Comes with a newer OS and guaranteed updates to Android 14.
- Better Build Quality: Gorilla Glass 5 offers better screen protection from accidental damage.
Trade-offs:
- The Motorola One 5G Ace prioritizes battery life and slightly better performance. While the Samsung Galaxy A52 focuses on overall better user experience through display, camera, and software features.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Motorola One 5G Ace Ideal Users:
- Power Users: Those who prioritize long battery life and moderate performance over high-end features.
- Budget-Conscious Users: Offers reliable 5G and battery at a potentially lower price point.
- Users who prioritize larger screen: The larger screen may be ideal for media consumption
Use Cases:
- Daily usage with long periods away from charger.
- Basic gaming and social media usage.
- Users seeking a reliable and affordable 5G experience.
Samsung Galaxy A52 Ideal Users:
- Media Consumers: Those who watch videos, browse photos and value high display quality and good audio.
- Camera Enthusiasts: Users who take frequent photos/videos and need a versatile camera system with OIS.
- Users Seeking a Premium Experience: Those who prefer a better build, smooth display, and advanced features.
- Users who want longevity: Those who want a phone with a good OS and software update support.
Use Cases:
- Daily social media usage, photo taking, and video viewing.
- Gaming enthusiasts who appreciate a smoother display and good graphics.
- Users who want a premium feeling device with fast charging.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- How important is battery life to you? If you need maximum battery life, the Ace is ideal. Otherwise, the A52 should handle a day of normal usage.
- Do you value a high-quality display and camera experience? The A52 excels in these aspects with its AMOLED screen, better camera system and video capabilities.
- Do you need dual SIM support? If you need dual sim, the A52 is your only option.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Budget-conscious user seeking long battery and 5G: Choose the Motorola One 5G Ace.
- User who prioritize display, camera and overall better experience: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A52.
- User who requires dual SIM: Choose the Samsung Galaxy A52.
My Choice and Explanation:
I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A52.
Here's why:
While the Motorola One 5G Ace offers a slightly larger battery and newer chipset, the Samsung Galaxy A52 provides a more compelling overall experience. The AMOLED display with a 90Hz refresh rate is significantly better for everyday usage and media consumption. The camera system on the A52 is more versatile, with higher resolution sensors, OIS, and additional lenses. I also prefer the design of the A52 because it's lighter and thinner, and includes added durability with Gorilla Glass protection. Finally, the faster 25W charging, stereo speakers and dual SIM support make it the more feature-rich and versatile phone overall. While the Ace does have its appeal for those who prioritize battery, the A52 offers a better balance of features for my personal use. The A52's software updates to Android 14 ensure a longer life for the device which is also an important consideration.