Smartphone Comparison: Motorola One 5G Ace vs. Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Motorola One 5G Ace | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm | 164.2 x 76.1 x 9.1 mm | Motorola is slightly taller and thicker, potentially less comfortable for one-handed use, although it's minor. |
| Weight | 212g | 205g | Samsung is lighter, making it slightly more comfortable during extended use. The difference is only 7 grams though, which is negligible. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.7" | 6.5" | Motorola offers a slightly larger screen, better for media consumption and multi-tasking. The difference is not significant. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | Motorola's display is much sharper, resulting in clearer text and images. This is very noticeable in day to day use. |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 393 | 270 | Motorola's higher pixel density makes the display appear sharper and more detailed than the Samsung's. This is a noticeable upgrade. |
| Technology | IPS LCD | TFT LCD | Motorola has better viewing angles and color reproduction. The IPS LCD is a superior technology for a better display quality. |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 60Hz | Both offer standard smoothness; neither has a higher refresh rate for smoother scrolling. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Peak brightness is unknown, making outdoor visibility hard to assess. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 750G 5G | Dimensity 720 | The Snapdragon 750G is generally more powerful, leading to smoother app loading and better gaming. |
| AnTuTu Score | 330,000 | 249,720 | Motorola offers a 32% performance increase which can be felt in day to day use. |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC3 | The Adreno 619 GPU is better for gaming. This is a significant difference for mobile gamers. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both should offer comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. |
| Charging | 15W | 15W | Both charge at a moderate rate; no significant difference in charging time. |
| Charging Features | 10W charger in-box | None | Motorola has a charger in-box while the A32 does not have information whether it comes with charger in-box or not. |
| Camera | |||
| Rear (Main) | 48MP f/1.7 | 48MP f/1.8 | Motorola has a wider aperture (f/1.7), potentially better in low light. The difference will be subtle though. |
| Selfie | 16MP f/2.2 | 13MP f/2.2 | Motorola has higher resolution selfies, capturing more detail. |
| Wide Angle | 8MP f/2.2 | 8MP f/2.2 | Both have comparable wide-angle cameras. |
| Portrait Mode | Not Present | 2MP f/2.4 | Samsung has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode, offering better background blur. |
| Macro | 2MP f/2.4 | 5MP f/2.4 | Samsung has higher resolution macro shots, capturing more details. |
| Video | 4K@30fps with EIS | 4K@30fps | Both capture 4K video but only the Motorola has EIS. The A32 also captures slow-motion videos at 120fps, while the Motorola only does 60fps. |
| Camera Features | PDAF, LAF, RAW, Night Mode | Quad camera, Ultra Stable Video | Motorola offers advanced focus capabilities, RAW capture and a night mode; Samsung has an ultra stable video and a quadruple camera. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, Upgradable to 13 | Samsung offers a more up-to-date OS with more updates, and features. |
| Connectivity | |||
| Wi-Fi | 802.11ac | 802.11ac | Both support the same Wi-Fi standards. |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 LE | 5.1 LE | Both support the same Bluetooth standards, although the A32 does support HID. |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | Samsung supports Beidou for better location tracking; Motorola supports SUPL. |
| SIM | Single SIM | Dual SIM | Samsung is more practical for users needing two phone numbers on one device. |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 64GB or 128GB | 64GB or 128GB | Both offer the same storage options; neither has expandable storage. |
| RAM | 4GB or 6GB | 4GB, 6GB or 8GB | Samsung offers a higher RAM option, beneficial for smoother multitasking. |
| Expandable | No | No | Neither phone allows you to expand storage. |
| Audio | |||
| Quality | 2 microphones | Dolby Atmos, Dolby Digital Plus | Samsung has superior audio enhancing features. Motorola has better microphone capabilities. |
| Security | |||
| Features | Rear-mounted fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted fingerprint sensor | Side-mounted sensor may be more ergonomic. Both provide basic biometric security. |
| Sensors | |||
| Sensors | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Fingerprint, Proximity | Accelerometer, Geomagnetic, Fingerprint, Proximity | Motorola offers better sensor capabilities for gaming. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Motorola One 5G Ace Advantages:
- Sharper Display: Higher resolution and pixel density (1080x2400, 393 PPI) offer a significantly clearer and more detailed viewing experience.
- Superior Display Technology: Uses IPS LCD technology, offering better color reproduction and viewing angles compared to TFT LCD.
- Better Performance: The Snapdragon 750G chipset and Adreno 619 GPU offer better overall performance, smoother app loading, and superior gaming.
- Camera Features: Includes PDAF, LAF, RAW, and Night Mode, enhancing focus, image quality, and low-light capabilities.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Advantages:
- More Up-to-Date OS: Comes with Android 11 and is upgradable to Android 13.
- Better Camera Features: Offers an ultra stable video and a quadruple camera.
- Dual SIM Support: Allows simultaneous use of two SIM cards, helpful for managing work and personal numbers.
- Higher RAM Option: Available with 8GB RAM, making multitasking smoother and more efficient.
- Dedicated Portrait Camera: A dedicated 2MP depth sensor, providing a better bokeh effect in portrait photos.
- Better Audio: Provides enhanced audio with features such as Dolby Atmos and Dolby Digital Plus.
Trade-offs:
- Motorola: Sacrifices software updates and dual SIM capabilities for better display and performance.
- Samsung: Offers better software and dual-SIM features but sacrifices display sharpness, technology, and overall performance.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Motorola One 5G Ace:
- Ideal User: Users who prioritize display quality, performance for gaming, and overall snappiness.
- Use Cases:
- Mobile gaming with better graphics and smooth performance.
- Frequent media consumption with a sharper and clearer display.
- Users who prefer photos with enhanced focus and better low-light capabilities.
- Price-to-Value: Offers excellent display and performance for the price.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G:
- Ideal User: Users who want a modern OS, dual SIM capabilities, enhanced audio, and a flexible camera system with a good portrait mode.
- Use Cases:
- Users with two phone numbers that need to be used simultaneously.
- Users that require a flexible camera for different occasions
- Users that value a modern operating system and future updates.
- Users that prefer enhanced audio.
- Price-to-Value: Provides modern features and flexibility at a competitive price.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Display Priority: How important is a sharp, high-quality display to your daily usage?
- Performance Needs: Do you plan on using the phone for gaming, and do you want smooth multi-tasking?
- Software and Features: How important is it to have the latest OS and dual SIM functionality?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Heavy Media & Gaming: If you primarily use your phone for games and media consumption, the Motorola One 5G Ace with its superior display and processing power is the better choice.
- Dual SIM and Software: If you need dual SIM functionality and desire a more up-to-date OS, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G is a more appropriate choice.
- Balanced Use: If you want a balanced performance but prioritize a good camera system and dual sim capabilities, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G is the better choice.
My Choice
Given my personal preferences, I would choose the Motorola One 5G Ace. The significantly sharper display and superior performance are crucial for my daily usage, which involves a lot of media consumption and mobile gaming. While the Samsung offers dual SIM and a more recent OS, I find the visual experience and smoothness of the Motorola to be more compelling. The additional camera features like PDAF, RAW capture, and Night Mode on the Motorola also make it more appealing for photography. Although the Samsung has a portrait mode, I believe I would benefit more from the better performance of the Motorola. The Motorola seems better optimized for the type of use I would get from the device.
