Motorola One 5G Ace vs Samsung Galaxy A23 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 14, 2021 September 2, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 125.14 cm³ 106.84 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.35 "/g
Weight 212 g 197 g
Height 166.1 mm 165.4 mm
Width 76.1 mm 76.9 mm
Thickness 9.9 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Frosted Silver
  • Volcanic Gray
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.7 % 82.5 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.96 mAh/cm³ 46.8 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 12
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Motorola One 5G Ace vs. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceSamsung Galaxy A23 5GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions166.1 × 76.1 × 9.9 mm165.4 × 76.9 × 8.4 mmMotorola is thicker and slightly larger overall, Samsung feels slimmer and may be easier to handle for some.
Weight212g197gSamsung is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use and pocketability.
Display
Size6.7"6.6"Motorola offers slightly more screen real estate for media consumption and gaming.
Resolution1080x24001080x2408Both are very similar, resulting in comparable image sharpness.
PPI393400Virtually identical pixel density; no noticeable difference in clarity.
TechnologyIPS LCDPLS LCDMotorola's IPS LCD typically offers slightly better viewing angles and color accuracy compared to PLS LCD.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzSamsung provides much smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the overall user experience, especially for gaming and fast-paced apps.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsUnable to compare brightness, both values seem invalid. (Likely a data entry error).
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 750G (8 nm)Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)Samsung’s newer chipset offers better power efficiency and slightly improved performance based on Antutu scores.
Antutu Score330,000418,000Samsung’s significantly higher benchmark score suggests faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better overall system responsiveness.
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 619Both phones offer the same graphics performance, good for casual games but not demanding graphics.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth offer similar battery life for daily use, expected to last a full day.
Charging15W25WSamsung recharges significantly faster, reducing downtime.
Charging Features10W rapid charger in-boxBypass ChargingMotorola offers a charger out of the box; Samsung supports bypass charging which allows for gaming or media consumption while plugged in without overcharging the battery.
Camera
Rear Main Camera48MP, f/1.7, 0.80 µm pixels50MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76" sensor, 0.64 µm pixelsSamsung has slightly higher resolution, Motorola has a slightly wider aperture, they will perform similarly for day to day pictures.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.2, 1.12 µm pixels8MP, f/2.0Motorola has much higher resolution for selfies. Samsung has a slightly wider aperture for better low-light performance.
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.2, 1.12 µm pixels5MP, f/2.2Motorola provides higher-resolution wide-angle images for better details, but both have similar aperture performance.
Portrait Mode (Depth)N/A2MP, f/2.4Samsung provides depth data and a portrait effect where the background is blurred and the subject is clear.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4, 1.75 µm pixels2MP, f/2.4Both offer the same resolution for macro shots, making them comparable.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fps with EIS1080p@30fpsMotorola can record 4K videos, resulting in higher quality for more detailed videos.
Video StabilizationEISOISSamsung's OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) provides superior video and image stabilization compared to Motorola's EIS (Electronic Image Stabilization).
Slow-motion60 fps120 fpsSamsung captures slow-motion videos with higher frame rate, enabling more detailed and smoother slow-motion footage.
Camera FeaturesTriple camera, Digital stabilization, Laser autofocus (LAF), RAW, Night ModeQuadruple camera, Optical Stabilization (OIS)Both share common features but have different specialization.
Software
OSAndroid 10Android 12 (upgradable to 14)Samsung offers a newer OS with more recent features, also gets Android upgrades making it more future proof.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11ac, Dual band, Wi-Fi Direct, Wi-Fi Display802.11ac, Wi-Fi DirectMotorola includes additional Wi-Fi features. Both support Wi-Fi ac and Wi-Fi Direct.
Bluetooth5.1 LE, A2DP, EDR5.1 LE, A2DP, AVRCP, DIP, HFP, HID, HSP, LE, PAN, OPP, PBAP/PAB, HOGP, APT-xSamsung offers more Bluetooth profiles for better compatibility with various accessories and audio devices.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoSamsung supports more satellite systems for precise location, offering better navigation in some regions.
SIMSingle SIM (Nano)Single SIM (Nano)Both support the same SIM card format.
Storage
Internal Storage64 GB or 128 GBN/AMotorola offers more storage options, but the A23 spec data is missing so we are not able to compare.
RAM4 GB or 6 GBN/AMotorola offers more RAM options, but the A23 spec data is missing so we are not able to compare.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone allows for expandable storage
Audio
Quality2 MicrophonesBasic audio featuresMotorola has better audio for clear voice capture.
Security
Featuresrear-mounted fingerprint sensorside-mounted fingerprint sensorSamsung has a more convenient and slightly more modern fingerprint sensor.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass 5Samsung is protected with Corning Gorilla Glass 5 while the Motorola lacks details on it's screen protection.
SensorsBiometric: Fingerprint; Proximity: Proximity; Motion: Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeBiometric: Fingerprint; Motion: Accelerometer, Gyroscope; Environmental: Barometer; Proximity: Ultrasonic proximity virtualSamsung includes a barometer for more advanced environmental data.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola One 5G Ace Advantages:

  • Larger Display: A slightly larger 6.7" screen for a more immersive viewing experience.
  • Higher Resolution Selfie Camera: 16MP front camera for more detailed self-portraits.
  • 4K Video Recording: Capability to shoot higher quality videos, useful for vlogging or capturing detailed memories.
  • Wider Aperture on Main Camera: f/1.7 aperture for better low-light pictures, resulting in higher image quality in dim conditions.
  • Laser Autofocus: Provides more precise autofocus for quicker image capture.
  • More Storage Options: 64GB or 128GB internal storage options
  • More RAM options: 4GB or 6GB ram options

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G Advantages:

  • Newer OS and Upgrades: Ships with Android 12 and has confirmed upgrades to Android 14, offering more recent features and future proofing.
  • Smoother Display: 120Hz refresh rate for significantly smoother scrolling and animations.
  • Faster Performance: Higher benchmark score indicates better app loading and multitasking.
  • Faster Charging: 25W fast charging allows quicker battery refills.
  • Better Video Stabilization: OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for smoother videos.
  • Portrait Mode (Depth) Camera: For better quality and accurate portrait shots.
  • Better Screen Protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 5 is a more scratch resistant material.
  • More Bluetooth Profiles: Better compatibility with a wider range of audio accessories.
  • Better GPS: Supports a wider array of satellite systems for accurate location.
  • More Sensors: Barometer and geomagnetic sensors for more comprehensive data.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • Motorola: Loses out on a smoother display and future-proof software. It is heavier and has inferior video stabilization.
  • Samsung: Has a lower resolution selfie camera, slightly smaller screen and doesn't support 4k video recording.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola One 5G Ace:

  • Ideal User: Users who prioritize a large screen and a good front-facing camera for video calls or selfies, as well as higher quality video recording.
  • Use Cases:
    • Frequent video callers and selfie takers.
    • Content creators on a budget who need high-quality video recording.
    • Users who prefer a larger screen for media consumption.
    • Users who want a slightly cheaper phone.

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G:

  • Ideal User: Users who want a smoother, more responsive phone with up-to-date software, and those that value camera stabilization.
  • Use Cases:
    • Gamers or heavy social media users who prefer a smoother display.
    • Users who need a reliable phone for day-to-day use with future proof software.
    • Users who take a lot of pictures and videos and want better stabilization.
    • Users that want a better and more durable screen.
    • Users that need a phone that recharges quickly.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Do you prioritize a smooth display experience and the latest OS? If yes, Samsung is the better choice.
  2. Do you need a high-resolution front camera and 4K video? If yes, the Motorola is the better choice.
  3. Are you looking for the best possible video quality or stabilization, or do you need more storage and ram options? If you value stabilization, the Samsung is the better option. If you value more storage and ram options the Motorola is the better choice.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Budget-Conscious Media Consumer: If you're on a strict budget and prefer a larger screen, and are ok with a slightly older OS, the Motorola is an acceptable choice.
  • Smooth Experience and Future-Proof Software: If you want a smooth, responsive phone with the latest OS, and also value camera stabilization, the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G is recommended.
  • Camera Focused User: If you are focused on higher resolution selfies, 4K video recording and wider main aperture then the Motorola is the better choice.

My Choice

I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G.

Here's why:

  1. Smoother Experience: The 120Hz display provides a significantly more enjoyable user experience for scrolling, gaming and navigating apps. This alone makes a big difference in the day-to-day feeling of the device.
  2. Faster Charging and Better Performance: The 25W charging and better chipset make a tangible difference in how quickly the phone recharges, loads apps, and runs demanding applications.
  3. Up-to-Date Software: The newer operating system and confirmation of upgrades to Android 14 ensure the device will have the latest features and security updates, making it a more future-proofed purchase.
  4. Camera Stabilization: The presence of OIS is a big plus for video recording quality and general image clarity.
  5. Better Build Quality: The Corning Gorilla Glass 5 and side mounted fingerprint sensor makes the phone feel more modern and premium than the Motorola One 5G Ace.
  6. More Comprehensive Sensor Suite: The addition of a Barometer and geomagnetics allows for better sensor data for applications and environmental information.

While the Motorola has some merits, such as the higher resolution selfie camera, and 4K video recording, I feel the superior screen, smoother performance, better software and better build quality of the Samsung A23 5G outweighs the Motorola in my personal use. It is a more well-rounded phone for my daily usage, and these improvements are more important to me than the higher resolution selfie camera that the Motorola offers.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.