Motorola One 5G Ace vs Oppo A54s - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A54s
Oppo A54s
Oppo

General

Launch Date January 14, 2021 November 18, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 125.14 cm³ 104.02 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.43 "/g
Weight 212 g 190 g
Height 166.1 mm 163.8 mm
Width 76.1 mm 75.6 mm
Thickness 9.9 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Frosted Silver
  • Volcanic Gray
  • Space Silver
  • Pearl Blue
  • Crystal Black

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.52 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.7 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 480 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 117.62 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.96 mAh/cm³ 48.07 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Adreno 619 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 11
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a breakdown of the key specifications for the Motorola One 5G Ace and the Oppo A54s, with an emphasis on their practical implications for the user:

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceOppo A54sPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm163.8 x 75.6 x 8.4 mmMotorola is slightly larger and thicker; Oppo is more compact and thinner.
Weight212g190gOppo is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use and pocketability.
Display
Size6.7"6.52"Motorola has a slightly larger screen, which might be preferable for media consumption.
Resolution1080x2400720x1600Motorola has a much sharper display; text and images will be clearer, leading to a more enjoyable viewing experience.
Pixel Density (PPI)393269Motorola's display is noticeably sharper and more detailed due to higher pixel density.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth have comparable color reproduction and viewing angles.
Refresh Rate60Hz60HzBoth will have similar smoothness when navigating interfaces.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBrightness information is missing.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm)MediaTek Helio G35 (12 nm)Motorola's chipset is significantly faster, offering snappier performance and better gaming capabilities.
AnTuTu Score330,000110,490Motorola has a dramatically higher benchmark score indicating superior overall performance in everyday tasks and gaming.
GPUAdreno 619PowerVR GE8320Motorola's GPU is much better for gaming and graphic-intensive applications.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/1.750MP, f/2.2Oppo has slightly higher resolution, but Motorola's wider aperture may capture better low-light photos.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.0Motorola has a higher-resolution selfie camera; Oppo has slightly better aperture for low-light selfies.
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.2Not availableMotorola includes a dedicated wide-angle lens for capturing broader scenes.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4Both have similar macro lens specifications.
Black & White LensNot available2MP, f/2.4Oppo has a dedicated black and white lens for creative photography.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps1080p@30fpsMotorola captures higher resolution video and has more frame rate options.
Camera FeaturesPDAF, LAF, RAW, Night Mode, EIS, etcBasic camera featuresMotorola has advanced autofocus and image processing capabilities.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth phones should offer similar battery life under comparable usage patterns.
Charging15W Fast ChargingStandard ChargingMotorola charges faster using 15W fast charging.
Battery Features10W in-box chargerReverse chargingMotorola has a faster in-box charger; Oppo can reverse charge other devices.
Software
OSAndroid 10Android 11Oppo has a newer version of Android out of the box.
Connectivity
WiFi802.11 a/b/g/n/ac802.11 a/b/g/n/acBoth support dual-band Wi-Fi; Motorola has Wi-Fi display functionality.
Bluetooth5.15.0Motorola uses a newer Bluetooth version. Oppo has better audio codecs.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoOppo has more precise positioning due to more satellite options
SIMSingle SIMDual SIMOppo supports using two SIM cards simultaneously
Storage
Internal64/128GB64/128GBBoth offer same storage options.
RAM4/6 GB4 GBMotorola offers option for more RAM for better multitasking.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither supports expandable storage.
Audio
Audio2 microphonesBasic AudioMotorola has enhanced audio capture with 2 microphones.
Security
Fingerprint SensorRear-mountedSide-mountedOppo uses a faster and more convenient side-mounted fingerprint sensor.
Sensors
SensorsAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, FingerprintAccelerometer, Magnetometer, Proximity, FingerprintMotorola has Gyroscope, better for gaming; Oppo has magnetometer for accurate compass functionality.
Build Quality
ProtectionUnknownUnknownBoth have unknown protection, which is a limitation for real-world comparison.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola One 5G Ace Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 750G chipset offers significantly faster processing, better app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance, which will be noticeable daily for most users.
  • Sharper Display: The 1080p display provides a crisper and more detailed viewing experience compared to Oppo's lower resolution, improving the enjoyment of visual content.
  • Better Cameras: Offers a wider range of camera features, a dedicated wide-angle lens, and higher-resolution selfie and video, resulting in greater creative flexibility.
  • Faster Charging: 15W fast charging allows quicker battery refills, which is beneficial for users on the go.
  • Enhanced Audio: The inclusion of 2 microphones provides better voice capture for clearer calls and recordings.
  • Advanced Sensors: Includes a gyroscope, enabling enhanced gaming experiences and augmented reality applications.

Oppo A54s Advantages:

  • Lighter and More Compact: The phone's lower weight and slimmer profile make it more comfortable to hold and carry, enhancing overall portability.
  • Newer OS: Ships with a newer version of Android (Android 11), potentially offering better features and software support.
  • Reverse Charging: Can charge other devices via reverse charging, offering convenience in emergencies.
  • Dual SIM Support: The dual SIM capability is ideal for users who need to use two phone numbers simultaneously.
  • Better GPS: More precise location tracking thanks to a larger number of supported systems.
  • More Audio Codecs: Supports higher-quality bluetooth codecs for better audio fidelity.

Trade-offs:

  • Motorola trades superior performance and camera features for a slightly bulkier device and lower battery charging features.
  • Oppo trades performance and camera capabilities for a lighter build, dual-sim, and reverse charging capabilities.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola One 5G Ace:

  • Ideal User: Individuals who prioritize performance for gaming, multitasking, and media consumption. People who value better camera capabilities for social media content creation.
  • Use Cases: Gaming, mobile photography and video, streaming high-resolution content, and multitasking between multiple apps.
  • Value: Offers better overall performance and camera capabilities at a similar price point, making it better value for power users.

Oppo A54s:

  • Ideal User: Individuals looking for a more affordable phone with a focus on practicality, portability, and decent battery life, as well as dual-SIM functionality.
  • Use Cases: Basic social media use, web browsing, light gaming, and people who travel and need to use 2 sim cards.
  • Value: Offers better portability, reverse charging, and dual-SIM, which is good for practical users.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Performance Needs: Do you prioritize smooth performance for gaming, demanding applications, and multitasking, or are your needs more basic?
  2. Camera Importance: How important is photo and video quality, particularly for social media or content creation?
  3. Practicality and Portability: Do you prefer a more lightweight, compact phone with dual SIM and reverse charging capabilities, or are you comfortable with a larger device for superior performance?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Performance and Media Consumption: If you're a gamer, frequent streamer, or someone who uses processor-intensive applications, the Motorola One 5G Ace is the better option due to its superior processor and sharper screen.
  • Scenario 2: Portability and Practicality: If you need a light and portable phone with a dual sim or reverse charging, the Oppo A54s is a more suitable option.
  • Scenario 3: Balanced Usage: If you want a balanced performance and camera without sacrificing portability, the Motorola would be more beneficial, however the trade-off with portability may be significant for some people.

My Choice

If I were to choose between these two phones, I would go for the Motorola One 5G Ace. While the Oppo A54s offers a more compact and lighter design, the performance difference is significant, especially the better display resolution and the much more powerful processor. I value a smoother user experience in everyday tasks and for gaming, and the Motorola provides that. The improved camera features, such as the wide-angle lens and better video recording, also tip the scales in its favor. Although I would love the dual sim functionality in the Oppo A54s, the single sim support on the Motorola One 5G Ace isn't a deal breaker for me.

Ultimately, the best choice depends on individual priorities, but for my needs, the Motorola offers a more well-rounded experience with a focus on power and visuals.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.