1. Specifications Comparison
Feature | Motorola One 5G Ace | Nokia G22 | Practical Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Design | |||
Dimensions | 166.1 × 76.1 × 9.9 mm | 165 × 76.2 × 8.5 mm | Motorola is slightly taller and thicker, potentially feeling bulkier. Nokia G22 is slimmer, might feel more comfortable in hand. |
Weight | 212g | 196.2g | Nokia G22 is significantly lighter, better for prolonged use. Motorola is heavier, might feel more solid. |
Display | |||
Size | 6.7" | 6.5" | Motorola has a slightly larger screen, better for media consumption. |
Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | Motorola's higher resolution means sharper images and text. Nokia's display will appear less detailed. |
Pixel Density (PPI) | 393 | 270 | Motorola's higher PPI results in a significantly sharper display, particularly noticeable with text and fine details. |
Technology | IPS LCD | IPS LCD | Both have similar LCD tech, so contrast and colors will be comparable. |
Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 90Hz | Nokia G22's 90Hz refresh rate results in smoother scrolling and animations. |
Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Identical peak brightness. Note: This is likely a data error as no display has 0 nits. |
Performance | |||
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Motorola's Snapdragon is significantly more powerful, offering faster app loading and smoother multitasking. |
AnTuTu Score | 330,000 | 253,300 | Motorola will perform noticeably better in games and demanding apps due to its higher score. |
GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MP1 | Motorola has a more powerful GPU for better gaming performance |
Camera | |||
Main Camera Resolution | 48MP (f/1.7) | 50MP (f/1.8) | Nokia G22 has slightly higher resolution but Motorola has a wider aperture. Real world results will depend on the specific sensor quality. |
Main Camera Pixel Size | 0.80µm | 0.64µm | Motorola has a slightly larger pixel size which will allow better light capture. |
Selfie Camera Resolution | 16MP (f/2.2) | 8MP (f/2.0) | Motorola has significantly higher selfie resolution, but Nokia has a wider aperture, better low light. |
Wide Angle Lens | Yes (8MP) | No | Motorola's wide angle lens gives more versatility when taking photos. |
Portrait Mode (depth) Lens | No | Yes (2MP) | Nokia's dedicated depth lens may slightly improve portrait mode results. |
Macro Lens | Yes (2MP) | Yes (2MP) | Both offer similar macro lens quality. |
Video Recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps (with EIS) | 1080p@30fps | Motorola offers higher resolution and framerate video capabilities. |
Video Stabilisation | EIS | No | Motorola has Electronic image stabilization to minimize shake while recording. |
Slow Motion | Yes (60fps) | No (30fps) | Motorola can record slow motion with higher fps, which can look more dramatic. |
Battery | |||
Capacity | 5000mAh | 5050mAh | Similar battery capacity, likely similar battery life. |
Charging | 15W | 20W | Nokia charges slightly faster. |
Other | |||
Operating System | Android 10 | Android 12 | Nokia is running a more recent version of Android. |
WiFi | 802.11ac | 802.11n | Motorola supports the newer AC standard which is faster. |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 | Motorola has a slightly newer Bluetooth version, but the difference is likely to be minimal. |
SIM | Single | Dual | Nokia supports Dual SIM cards which is very useful for some users. |
Internal Storage Options | 64GB/128GB | 64GB/128GB/256GB | Nokia offers a larger 256GB storage option. |
RAM Options | 4GB/6GB | 4GB/6GB | Similar RAM configurations on both. |
Expandable Storage | No | No | Neither phone offers expandable storage. |
Fingerprint Sensor Location | Rear-mounted | Side-mounted | Side mounted is generally considered more convenient. |
Screen Protection | Unknown | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Nokia offers better screen protection against scratches and minor impact. |
Additional Sensors | Compass, Gyroscope | None | Motorola includes compass and gyroscope, enabling advanced features and better gaming. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Motorola One 5G Ace Advantages:
- Significantly Better Performance: The Snapdragon 750G chipset provides superior speed for apps and games.
- Sharper Display: Higher resolution and PPI offer a noticeably clearer viewing experience.
- Advanced Camera Features: Offers 4K video, wide-angle lens, and a higher resolution selfie camera for more versatility.
- Enhanced Video Capabilities: EIS and 60fps slow-motion recording contribute to better video results.
- Better Connectivity: Supports newer WiFi Standard, which is faster and more reliable.
- More Sensors: Includes gyroscope and compass for advanced applications, like gaming and AR.
Nokia G22 Advantages:
- Lighter Design: More comfortable to hold for longer periods.
- Smoother Display: 90Hz refresh rate offers a slightly more fluid experience.
- Faster Charging: 20W charging is slightly quicker than Motorola's 15W.
- Dual SIM Support: Enables the use of two SIM cards simultaneously.
- Better Screen Protection: Gorilla Glass 3 is more resistant to scratches and damage.
- More Storage: Offers a 256GB storage option for users with more data.
- Better Operating System: Comes with Android 12 as standard, while Motorola has Android 10.
Trade-offs:
- Motorola: Trades some comfort (weight, size) and display smoothness for performance and camera versatility.
- Nokia: Trades processing power and camera features for a lighter design, smoother screen and a lower price point.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Motorola One 5G Ace is ideal for:
- Users who prioritize performance: Gamers and heavy app users who need smooth operation and responsiveness.
- Content creators: Users who want high-quality videos and versatile camera options.
- Media consumers: Those who value a sharp, detailed display for watching videos and browsing.
- Tech enthusiasts: Users who want a range of sensors for advanced apps and features
Use Cases:
- Mobile gaming: the stronger GPU, gyroscope and compass mean it is better suited for advanced games.
- Capturing high-resolution video: 4K video capability is good for making professional looking video.
- Using demanding apps: the faster processor and higher RAM allow for smoother use of more intensive apps.
Nokia G22 is ideal for:
- Everyday users: People who prioritize comfort, battery life, and general usability over high performance.
- Users on a budget: Those seeking a reliable phone with essential features at a lower price.
- Users who need dual SIM: People that need to use 2 SIMs, for example a personal and a business number.
- Users prone to scratches: The Gorilla Glass screen provides more protection from scratches and damage.
Use Cases:
- General social media and browsing: the 90hz display and longer battery life will make it more suited for general use.
- Basic photography and video: The main camera sensor is good enough for simple use.
- Extended use: The lower weight and longer battery life means it can be used for longer.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Performance Needs: Do you require a phone that can handle demanding tasks and games, or is basic performance sufficient?
- Camera Requirements: Do you need a versatile camera setup with advanced features, or is a basic camera adequate?
- Comfort and Handling: Do you prefer a lighter, more compact device, or are you okay with a slightly bulkier, more feature-rich phone?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Heavy Gamer/App User
- Recommendation: Motorola One 5G Ace. The Snapdragon 750G chipset and Adreno 619 GPU will provide a far superior gaming experience, along with the added benefits of a sharper screen and more sensors.
- Scenario 2: Budget-Conscious Daily User
- Recommendation: Nokia G22. The G22 offers a comfortable and reliable experience, with dual sim capabilities at a lower price point, making it ideal for everyday use.
- Scenario 3: Content Creator
- Recommendation: Motorola One 5G Ace. The Motorola has a much more versatile camera setup including 4K video recording and an ultrawide camera, giving more flexibility.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would personally choose the Motorola One 5G Ace. While the Nokia G22 offers a few advantages such as a lighter design, and a higher refresh rate display, the performance gap between the two devices is significant. I am a moderate gamer and use demanding apps, and the difference in performance will mean that the Motorola offers a much more responsive experience. Although I prefer the side-mounted fingerprint sensor, the rear sensor on the Motorola isn't a dealbreaker. Ultimately I believe that the better performance, camera and connectivity of the Motorola make it the better choice.