Motorola One 5G Ace vs Nokia G100 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G100
Nokia G100
Nokia

General

Launch Date January 14, 2021 October 1, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 125.14 cm³ 113.73 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.34 "/g
Weight 212 g 195.1 g
Height 166.1 mm 166.6 mm
Width 76.1 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 9.9 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Frosted Silver
  • Volcanic Gray
  • Nordic Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.52 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.7 % 80.3 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 117.62 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.96 mAh/cm³ 43.97 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

Here's a detailed comparison of the Motorola One 5G Ace and the Nokia G100, focusing on practical implications:

Design

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceNokia G100Practical Impact
Dimensions166.1 × 76.1 × 9.9 mm166.6 × 76.7 × 8.9 mmThe Motorola is slightly thicker but has a negligibly smaller footprint, which may or may not be noticeable in hand.
Weight212g195.1gThe Nokia G100 is noticeably lighter (16.9g difference), which could improve comfort during extended use.

Display

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceNokia G100Practical Impact
Size6.7"6.52"The Motorola offers a marginally larger screen, potentially better for media consumption.
Resolution1080x2400720x1600The Motorola's higher resolution provides sharper images and text, making it better for detailed viewing.
PPI393269Motorola's significantly higher pixel density results in a clearer and less pixelated display.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth screens are expected to have similar color and viewing angles.
Refresh Rate60Hz60HzBoth displays have standard 60Hz refresh rate, meaning smooth scrolling will be similar.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsPeak brightness not specified; no practical difference.

Performance

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceNokia G100Practical Impact
ChipsetSnapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm)Snapdragon 662 (11 nm)The Motorola's chip is newer and more powerful, which results in smoother performance, faster app loading, and better gaming capabilities.
AnTuTu Score330,000201,615Motorola offers significantly better performance, suitable for gaming and demanding apps.
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 610Motorola has a better GPU for graphics-intensive tasks like gaming.

Camera

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceNokia G100Practical Impact
Standard Camera48MP f/1.713MP f/2.0The Motorola's main camera captures more detailed photos and performs better in low light due to the wider aperture.
Selfie Camera16MP f/2.28MP f/2.4The Motorola's selfie camera captures sharper photos.
Wide Angle Lens8MP f/2.25MP f/2.2Motorola's wide angle lens captures slightly higher resolution photos.
Portrait Mode (Depth)N/A2MP f/2.4Only the Nokia has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode.
Macro Lens2MP f/2.4N/AOnly the Motorola has a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps (EIS)1080p@30fps (EIS)The Motorola can record higher resolution video, offering better quality. Both offer image stabilization.
Slow Motion60fps120fpsThe Nokia G100 can record slow-motion at a higher frame rate, allowing for more detailed slow-motion captures.
Additional Camera FeaturesPDAF, LAF, RAWNoneThe Motorola's Phase Detection and Laser AutoFocus (PDAF, LAF) give faster focusing; RAW format allows for more editing flexibility.

Battery

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceNokia G100Practical Impact
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacity, suggesting similar battery life.
Charging15W Fast Charging15W Fast ChargingBoth phones have 15W fast charging; expect similar charging times.
Included Charger10W Rapid ChargerNot specifiedOnly Motorola includes charger in the box.

Other

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceNokia G100Practical Impact
Operating SystemAndroid 10Android 12Nokia G100 ships with a more recent version of Android.
WiFi802.11 a/b/g/n/ac802.11 a/b/g/n/acSimilar Wi-Fi capabilities.
Bluetooth5.1 LE, A2DP, EDR, LE5.0 LE, A2DP, LEMotorola has slightly more recent version Bluetooth with Enhanced Data Rate.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASSMotorola supports more satellite systems for better location accuracy.
SIMSingle SIMDual SIMThe Nokia G100 supports dual SIM cards, useful for separating personal and work numbers or for international travel.
Internal Storage64GB/128GB32GB/128GBBoth phones offer 128 GB, but the Nokia's base storage is lower.
RAM4GB/6GB3GB/4GBMotorola offers more RAM option, improving multitasking and performance.
Expandable StorageNoNoBoth phones lack expandable storage.
Audio2 Microphones2 MicrophonesSimilar audio recording performance.
SecurityRear Fingerprint SensorSide Fingerprint SensorSide fingerprint sensors are generally considered easier to access.
Screen ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass 3The Nokia has a more robust screen protection.
SensorsAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, FingerprintAccelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, Barometer, FingerprintNokia offers a barometer, which is useful for tracking altitude.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola One 5G Ace Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Performance: The Snapdragon 750G and Adreno 619 offer noticeably faster performance than the Snapdragon 662 and Adreno 610 of the G100, resulting in smoother multitasking and gaming.
  • Superior Display: The 1080x2400 resolution and higher pixel density (393ppi) of the Motorola result in a sharper and clearer viewing experience.
  • Better Main Camera: The 48MP f/1.7 camera captures much more detail and performs better in low light than the 13MP f/2.0 of the G100.
  • Better Selfie Camera: The 16MP front facing camera will take much sharper selfies than the 8MP of the Nokia.
  • More Camera Features: The Motorola’s PDAF, LAF, and RAW features provide more advanced control and faster focus for the camera, and more editing flexibility.
  • More RAM Option: The Motorola offers a 6GB of RAM option that is better for intensive multitasking than the 4GB option of the Nokia.
  • Slightly Faster Bluetooth: Bluetooth 5.1 offers slightly faster connection and data transfer speeds than Bluetooth 5.0.

Nokia G100 Advantages:

  • Lighter Build: The G100 weighs 16.9 grams less, making it more comfortable for extended use and pocketability.
  • Newer OS: The G100 comes with Android 12 out of the box, providing the latest software features and potentially better security.
  • Dual SIM Support: The G100 offers dual SIM capabilities, allowing for the simultaneous use of two phone numbers, making it useful for managing work and personal numbers.
  • Dedicated Portrait Camera: G100's dedicated portrait (depth) camera, can create a bokeh effect that is missing from the Motorola.
  • Better screen protection: Corning Gorilla Glass 3 provides better resistance against scratches than the unspecified glass of the Motorola.
  • Barometer sensor: Useful for more accurate altitude tracking.
  • Side-mounted fingerprint sensor: Many users find side-mounted fingerprint sensors more convenient than rear-mounted ones.
  • Better Slow-Motion: Ability to record slow-motion at 120fps vs 60fps of the Motorola is a practical difference.

Trade-offs:

  • The Motorola sacrifices some portability and ergonomics due to its slightly larger size and weight for the sake of higher performance and better camera.
  • The Nokia G100 loses out on overall performance and picture quality for the sake of more modern Android OS and some additional camera features.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola One 5G Ace Ideal User:

  • Performance-focused users: Gamers, multitaskers, and anyone who needs smooth performance in demanding apps.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize good camera quality for everyday photos, as well as the ability to capture high-resolution videos and photos with fine grain control.
  • Media Consumers: Users who enjoy watching videos and browsing on a large, high-resolution screen.
  • Users looking for better bluetooth connectivity.

Use Cases:

  • Gaming: Runs graphically intensive games smoothly due to superior CPU/GPU combination.
  • Photography/Videography: Captures more detailed photos and videos, especially in low light with wider aperture lens.
  • Multitasking: Handles multiple apps running simultaneously without noticeable lag due to superior processor and higher RAM option.
  • Media Consumption: Better screen for watching videos, browsing, and reading, especially those who need text that is very crisp.

Nokia G100 Ideal User:

  • Users that prefer a more recent Android OS: User that would like the latest version of Android that was available at the time of release.
  • Users that prefer a lightweight phone: Those who prioritize portability and comfort.
  • Users who use dual SIM cards: Those who need to manage multiple phone numbers for work, travel, or personal reasons.
  • Budget-conscious buyers: Those looking for an affordable device that still gets the job done well for basic tasks.
  • Users who prefer better slow-motion video: Those that may want to record action videos.

Use Cases:

  • Everyday tasks: Handles basic smartphone tasks (calling, browsing, messaging) well.
  • Dual SIM Usage: Ideal for those who need two phone numbers for work and personal use.
  • Longer sessions: Lighter device will be more comfortable to hold for a long period.
  • Outdoor use: The Barometer sensor can be useful for tracking altitude for those that are hikers or enjoy being in the outdoors.
  • Taking portrait photography: the portrait camera on the G100 will be more useful than the lacking portait mode on the Motorola.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Ask:

  1. How important is raw performance for my needs? (Gaming, multitasking, app loading). If performance is critical, the Motorola is the better choice.
  2. Do I prioritize camera quality or the latest software? If picture quality is a priority, then the Motorola is better. If a newer version of Android is more important, then the Nokia is better.
  3. How much do I care about weight and ergonomics? If comfort is a key concern, the Nokia, being noticeably lighter, is preferable.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1 (Performance & Camera Focused): If you plan to play games or capture detailed photos and videos regularly, and do not mind the older OS, then the Motorola One 5G Ace is the better choice.
  • Scenario 2 (Budget and Practicality Focused): If you value a modern Android OS, dual-SIM capabilities, and prefer a lightweight device and are on a budget, the Nokia G100 will be the better choice.
  • Scenario 3 (General use): If you use your phone for basic tasks, and value dual-SIM and do not mind the slightly older OS, then the Nokia G100 will be the better choice.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Motorola One 5G Ace.

While the Nokia G100 has a slightly more modern Android OS, I believe that the performance gains of the Motorola are much more important for my daily use. The sharper display, better camera, faster performance, and more RAM will lead to a much smoother experience in general use, and when playing games. Additionally, I prefer the inclusion of advanced camera features such as PDAF, LAF, and RAW support, which is more important to me than a portrait camera that the G100 provides. Finally, the inclusion of an in-box rapid charger is a plus, as most manufacturers do not include one anymore.

Although the Nokia is slightly lighter, has dual-SIM capabilities, and is running a more modern version of Android, I do not value these as much as the performance gains offered by the Motorola. Therefore, the Motorola One 5G Ace is a better choice for me, as it has better features that align more with my personal use case.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.