Motorola One 5G Ace vs Nokia C32 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia C32
Nokia C32
Nokia

General

Launch Date January 14, 2021 February 25, 2023
Release Year 2021 2023

Physical

Volume 125.14 cm³ 107.44 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.26 "/g
Weight 212 g 199.4 g
Height 166.1 mm 164.6 mm
Width 76.1 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 9.9 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Frosted Silver
  • Volcanic Gray
  • Charcoal
  • Autumn Green
  • Beach Pink

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.7 % 81.6 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.96 mAh/cm³ 46.54 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 IMG8322

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola One 5G AceNokia C32Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions166.1 x 76.1 x 9.9 mm164.6 x 75.9 x 8.6 mmMotorola is slightly taller and thicker, may feel bulkier. Nokia is more pocketable.
Weight212g199.4gNokia feels lighter in hand, more comfortable for extended use. Motorola's extra weight may give a more substantial feel to some users.
Display
Size6.7"6.5"Motorola has a slightly larger screen, better for media consumption and gaming.
Resolution1080x2400720x1600Motorola display is noticeably sharper, text and images are clearer. Nokia's screen may appear less detailed.
PPI393270Motorola has a crisper display with higher pixel density, smoother edges and more clarity.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDSimilar viewing angles and color reproduction, but resolution makes a huge difference.
Refresh Rate60Hz60HzBoth provide a standard refresh rate, scrolling and animations feel similar.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth phones seem to have same brightness which is not ideal for outdoor use. Specific brightness values are missing.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 750G 5G (8nm)Unisoc SC9863A1 (22nm)Motorola provides a faster and more efficient chipset for better multitasking and gaming performance and 5G support. Nokia's chipset is weaker and less power-efficient.
AnTuTu Score330,000109,200Motorola performs significantly faster for smoother day-to-day operation and gaming. Nokia may struggle with intensive tasks.
GPUAdreno 619IMG8322Motorola offers better graphics performance for demanding apps and games. Nokia is fine for light gaming.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/1.7, 0.8µm50MPNokia's main camera has slightly higher megapixel count, details on pixel size is missing. Image quality may still vary due to other factors.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm8MP, f/2.2Motorola offers significantly better selfies, with more detail, better for video calls and photos.
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.2, 1.12µmNoneMotorola offers more versatility with an ultrawide lens, great for landscape shots.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4, 1.75µm2MP, f/2.4Both offer similar macro lens capabilities for close-up photos, detail on pixel size missing on nokia.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps (EIS)1080p@30fpsMotorola supports higher quality video and smoother recording (EIS), suitable for better vlogging. Nokia is limited to 1080p recording.
Camera FeaturesTriple Camera, LAF, RAW, Night ModeDual Camera, Front FlashMotorola offers more comprehensive features like night mode and RAW output which offers better flexibility. Nokia has Front Flash for selfies.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth offer similar battery life, expected to last a full day of typical use.
Charging15W Fast Charging (Li-Ion)10W Fast Charging (Li-Polymer)Motorola charges faster, reducing wait times. Battery type differences are minor in practical usage.
Features10W charger in-boxNoneMotorola includes a charger in-box
Software
OSAndroid 10Android 13Nokia runs a much newer version of Android which means more security, better performance and newer features, while Motorola runs Android 10 out of the box which may not receive software updates.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11ac, Dual Band802.11nMotorola offers faster, more reliable Wi-Fi connections.
Bluetooth5.1 LE, EDR4.2 LEMotorola has newer Bluetooth for more efficient and reliable connections with peripherals.
SIMSingle SIMDual SIMNokia supports two SIM cards simultaneously, more convenient for multiple phone numbers, while Motorola only support one.
Storage
Internal64GB or 128GB64GB or 128GBBoth offer similar storage options, suitable for storing apps, photos and videos.
RAM4GB or 6GB3GB or 4GBMotorola has more RAM for smoother multitasking, especially with higher 6GB variant.
Expandable StorageNoNoNo expandable storage, might be a limiting factor for some users.
Audio
Quality2 microphonesBasic Audio featuresMotorola may have better audio recording, clearer voice calls with dual mic setup.
Security
FeaturesRear-mounted fingerprint sensorSide-mounted fingerprint sensorNokia has a side-mounted fingerprint scanner which is easier to reach.
Sensors
FeaturesFingerprint, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeAccelerometer, ProximityMotorola offers more sensors which may enhance the user experience during games and navigation.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola One 5G Ace Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Snapdragon 750G chipset offers vastly superior processing power compared to the Unisoc chip in the Nokia, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance.
  • Superior Display: Higher resolution and pixel density lead to a sharper and clearer visual experience.
  • Better Cameras: Higher resolution front-facing camera and added ultrawide lens offers more versatility and image quality. Better video recoding features.
  • Faster Charging: 15W charging is noticeably faster than 10W charging, reducing wait times.
  • More comprehensive sensor suite: Includes fingerprint sensor, gyroscope, and compass for more advanced functionality in games and other apps.
  • Better Connectivity: Faster and more reliable Wi-Fi and Bluetooth.
  • More RAM Options: Up to 6GB for smoother multitasking.
  • Better audio quality: Dual microphones that provide clearer sound.

Nokia C32 Advantages:

  • More Recent Software: Comes with Android 13 out of the box, providing better security, newer features, and potentially longer software support.
  • Lighter and Slimmer: More compact and comfortable in the hand for some users.
  • Dual SIM support: Convenient for using two phone numbers at the same time.
  • Side mounted fingerprint scanner: More convenient and easily reachable

Trade-offs:

  • Motorola: The older software might mean shorter software update availability. The size and weight can make it slightly bulky.
  • Nokia: Significantly lower performance, limited camera features, less capable display, slower charging, single SIM and limited sensors.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola One 5G Ace is Ideal For:

  • Performance Users: Users who prioritize speed and smoothness for gaming, multitasking, and everyday tasks.
  • Media Consumers: Users who enjoy watching videos and other media content and appreciate a higher-quality display.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who want a more versatile camera setup with ultrawide lens and higher quality front camera and better video recording.
  • Users who prefer better connectivity: Users that prioritize fast and reliable Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connections.

Nokia C32 is Ideal For:

  • Basic Users: Users who need a smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light web browsing.
  • Budget-Conscious Buyers: Users who want a basic phone with the latest version of Android for a lower price.
  • Users who prioritize newer software: Those looking for better software and longer support with android 13 out of the box.
  • Users who use two SIMs: Users who use two SIM cards simultaneously.

Use Cases:

  • Motorola One 5G Ace: Gaming, social media, photography, video editing, multi-tasking, and daily use for someone who needs a more powerful phone.
  • Nokia C32: Basic communication, browsing, media consumption and calls. Basic daily use for someone who does not need a powerful phone.

Price-to-Value:

  • The Motorola One 5G Ace provides more value for its price, given its superior performance and features. While it's likely more expensive than the Nokia C32, the performance gap makes it worth it if you value a better overall experience.
  • The Nokia C32 is a very basic and barebones smartphone, with very basic features, and should only be bought if you are very budget conscious and need to use two sims.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. Performance Needs: How important is smooth performance for your day-to-day use? (Consider gaming, multitasking, app loading speeds.)
  2. Display Preference: How much do you value display sharpness and clarity for media consumption and general usage?
  3. Software priority: Do you value newer software updates and security compared to performance and camera quality?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Heavy User:
    • Recommendation: Motorola One 5G Ace. The superior performance, display, camera system, connectivity, and battery charging will provide a much better user experience.
  • Scenario 2: Budget-Conscious User with Basic Needs:
    • Recommendation: Nokia C32. If a limited budget is the primary concern and you only need a phone for basic tasks, the Nokia C32 might be sufficient.
  • Scenario 3: Software Updates and Security is a Priority:
    • Recommendation: Nokia C32. Comes with Android 13 and should receive more updates compared to Motorola which comes with Android 10 out of the box.

My Choice and Why!

I would choose the Motorola One 5G Ace. While it is older than the Nokia C32 and may not receive as many software updates, the gap in performance is huge. The Motorola provides a much smoother and faster experience, a better display for media, a better front camera for selfies and a better main camera overall with a better video quality. The addition of a Wide angle lens and a comprehensive sensor suite makes this a no brainer for me. It provides a far better value for the money, especially if you are looking for a phone that can handle more than just basic tasks. It is a more balanced phone, and I value performance and a better media experience more than having a newer version of Android.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.