Motorola Moto G85 vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 25, 2024 September 20, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 89.95 cm³ 88.78 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.9 "/g 3.17 "/g
Weight 171 g 199 g
Height 161.9 mm 149.6 mm
Width 73.1 mm 71.5 mm
Thickness 7.6 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cobalt Blue
  • Olive Green
  • Urban Grey
  • Magenta
  • Black Titanium
  • White Titanium
  • Natural Titanium
  • Desert Titanium

Display

Screen Size 6.67 " 6.3 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1206 x 2622
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 90.8 % 90.9 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 460 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 1000 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 2000 nits
Peak Brightness 1600 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 112.39 mAh/in² 90.25 mAh/in²
Battery Density 55.59 mAh/cm³ 40.35 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3582 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6 nm) Apple A18 Pro (3 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) Hexa-core (2x4.05 GHz + 4x2.42 GHz)
GPU Adreno 619 Apple GPU (6-core graphics)

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2, Gen 2, DisplayPort

Software

Operating System Android iOS
Initial OS Version 14 18
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G85Apple iPhone 16 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.9 x 73.1 x 7.6 mm149.6 x 71.5 x 8.3 mmiPhone 16 Pro is noticeably smaller and potentially easier to handle one-handed despite being heavier.
Weight171g199giPhone 16 Pro is significantly heavier, potentially impacting comfort during extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedBuild quality and durability cannot be compared without further information.
Display
Display Size6.67"6.3"Moto G85 offers a larger screen for media consumption, while the iPhone 16 Pro provides a more compact form factor.
Display TypeP-OLED, 1B colors, 120HzLTPO Super Retina XDR OLED, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to 120Hz refresh rate. LTPO on iPhone allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, potentially saving battery. iPhone's "Super Retina XDR" suggests higher color accuracy and contrast, but real-world differences may vary.
Resolution1080 x 24001206 x 2622iPhone 16 Pro has a sharper display with higher pixel density (460 ppi vs 395 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Peak Brightness1600 nits2000 nits (HBM)iPhone 16 Pro boasts higher peak brightness, ensuring better visibility in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6nm)Apple A18 Pro (3nm)A18 Pro is expected to significantly outperform the Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 in terms of processing power and graphics performance. 3nm fabrication suggests better power efficiency for the A18 Pro.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Hexa-core (2x4.05 GHz + 4x2.42 GHz)A18's higher clock speeds suggest significantly better single-core performance, important for responsiveness.
GPUAdreno 619Apple GPU (6-core graphics)Apple's custom GPU in the A18 Pro is expected to provide a substantial advantage in gaming and graphically demanding tasks.
RAM12GB8GBWhile the Moto G85 has more RAM, iOS's memory management may make this difference less significant in real-world usage.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh3582 mAhMoto G85 has a significantly larger battery, likely translating to longer battery life. However, real-world usage depends on software optimization and usage patterns.
Camera
Video Capabilities1080p@30/60fpsUp to 4K@120fps (HDR), 1080p@240fps (HDR)iPhone 16 Pro offers significantly superior video recording capabilities with higher resolution, frame rates, and HDR support, catering to professional and enthusiast videographers.
Specific Camera DetailsNot provided for either phoneNot provided for either phoneDetailed camera comparison is not possible without sensor size, aperture, and other specifications.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G85 Advantages:

  • Larger Display: Better for media consumption and multitasking.
  • Larger Battery: Potentially longer battery life.
  • More RAM: Could offer smoother multitasking in certain scenarios.
  • Lower Price: Expected given the "medium price" range.

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly Higher Performance: Faster processing, smoother graphics, better for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Sharper Display: Crisper images and text.
  • Superior Video Recording: More resolution, frame rate, and HDR options.
  • More Compact Design: Easier one-handed use for some.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto G85 Ideal User: Budget-conscious users prioritizing battery life and a large display for media consumption. Suitable for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and casual gaming.

iPhone 16 Pro Ideal User: Users who demand top-tier performance, a premium display, and advanced camera features. Ideal for power users, gamers, content creators, and those prioritizing a smooth and seamless user experience.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The iPhone 16 Pro is significantly more expensive.
  2. What are your primary use cases? (Gaming, photography, social media, etc.)
  3. How important is battery life versus performance?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Casual User: Moto G85
  • Demanding User, Prioritizes Performance: iPhone 16 Pro
  • Photographer/Videographer: iPhone 16 Pro (assuming superior camera hardware based on historical trends)
  • Heavy Media Consumer: Moto G85 for larger screen, iPhone 16 Pro for better display quality - consider individual preferences.
Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.