Motorola Moto G82 vs Samsung Galaxy S24 FE - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 7, 2022 October 3, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 95.9 cm³ 100.18 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.82 "/g 3.15 "/g
Weight 173 g 213 g
Height 160.9 mm 162 mm
Width 74.5 mm 77.3 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Meteorite Gray
  • White Lily
  • Yellow
  • Blue
  • Graphite
  • Gray
  • Mint

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.7 % 88 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 385 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1900 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 104.70 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.14 mAh/cm³ 46.92 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4700 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Exynos 2400e (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) 10-core (1x3.1 GHz + 2x2.9 GHz + 3x2.6 GHz + 4x1.95 GHz)
GPU Adreno 619 Xclipse 940

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G82 vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Motorola Moto G82 and the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, two compelling smartphones catering to different needs and budgets. My goal is to equip you with the knowledge to decide which phone best fits your life.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G82Samsung Galaxy S24 FEReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.9 x 74.5 x 8162 x 77.3 x 8S24 FE slightly larger; pocketability depends on individual preference.
Weight (g)173213G82 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialPlasticGlassS24 FE offers a more premium feel and potentially better durability.
Display
Display TypeAMOLED, 120HzDynamic AMOLED 2X, 120HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and vibrant colors; S24 FE likely has higher peak brightness.
Display Size (inches)6.66.7Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (pixels)1080 x 24001080 x 2340Similar sharpness; difference in aspect ratio minimally impacts content viewing.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5G (6nm)Exynos 2400e (4nm)S24 FE boasts a significantly more powerful processor, enabling smoother multitasking and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2.2 GHz & 1.7 GHz)Deca-core (up to 3.1 GHz)S24 FE's superior CPU architecture delivers faster processing speeds.
GPUAdreno 619Xclipse 940S24 FE's GPU provides a substantial boost in graphics performance for demanding games and apps.
RAM (GB)68More RAM in S24 FE allows for more apps to run in the background without performance slowdown.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Comparable resolution; sensor details suggest S24 FE may have better low-light performance.
Ultrawide (MP)813S24 FE offers a higher resolution ultrawide lens for capturing wider scenes.
Telephoto (MP)N/A8S24 FE includes a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom, absent in the G82.
Video Recording1080p@60fps8K@30fpsS24 FE capable of significantly higher resolution video recording.
Battery Life
Battery Capacity (mAh)50004700G82 has a slightly larger battery, but real-world battery life depends on usage patterns.
Fast Charging (W)3025G82 offers slightly faster wired charging.

2. Key Insights

The Moto G82 shines as a budget-friendly option with a surprisingly smooth 120Hz AMOLED display and long-lasting battery. It's lightweight and comfortable for everyday use. However, its processor is less powerful, making it suitable for casual users, not heavy gamers or multitaskers.

The Samsung Galaxy S24 FE, on the other hand, is a performance powerhouse. Its Exynos 2400e chip, coupled with 8GB of RAM and a superior GPU, delivers a flagship-level experience. The camera system, particularly with the addition of a telephoto lens and 8K video recording, significantly outperforms the G82. While the battery is slightly smaller, the S24 FE offers faster data transfer speeds with its USB 3.2 port.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Moto G82: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life, a smooth display, and essential smartphone functionalities. Great for social media, web browsing, light gaming, and casual photography.

Samsung Galaxy S24 FE: Perfect for power users, mobile gamers, photography enthusiasts, and those seeking a premium smartphone experience without the flagship price tag. Excellent for demanding tasks, content creation, and capturing high-quality photos and videos.

4. Buying Decision Framework

Questions to Ask Yourself:

  1. What's your budget? The G82 is significantly more affordable.
  2. What are your primary smartphone uses? Casual use vs. demanding tasks/gaming.
  3. How important is camera quality and versatility? The S24 FE offers a clear advantage.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy S24 FE

While the Moto G82 is a solid budget option, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy S24 FE. As a tech journalist who frequently multitasks, consumes multimedia, and needs a reliable camera for capturing events, the S24 FE's superior performance, camera system, and overall feature set make it the clear winner for me. The price difference is justified by the significant jump in capabilities. The future-proofing offered by the more powerful processor and the inclusion of features like 8K video recording are compelling. I value the smoother user experience, faster loading times, and the ability to handle demanding tasks without compromise. The slightly heavier weight is a minor trade-off for the substantial gain in performance and features.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.