Motorola Moto G82 vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 7, 2022 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 95.9 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.82 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 173 g 222 g
Height 160.9 mm 162.3 mm
Width 74.5 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 8 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Meteorite Gray
  • White Lily
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.7 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.14 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G82 vs. Samsung Galaxy M35: A Comparative Analysis

Let's dive into a detailed comparison of the Motorola Moto G82 and the Samsung Galaxy M35, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly offer in real-world usage.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G82Samsung Galaxy M35Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.9 x 74.5 x 8162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1M35 slightly larger and heavier; G82 thinner and more pocketable
Weight (g)173222G82 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue
Display
Size (inches)6.66.6Same screen real estate
TypeAMOLED, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 120HzBoth offer vibrant colors and smooth scrolling; M35 potentially brighter
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2340Negligible difference in sharpness
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5GExynos 1380 5GM35 boasts a more powerful and efficient processor
CPUOcta-core (2.2 GHz)Octa-core (2.4 GHz)M35 likely faster in demanding tasks and multitasking
RAM (GB)68M35 offers smoother multitasking and app loading
OSAndroid 12Android 14M35 ships with a newer OS, offering potential feature advantages
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Comparable resolution; sensor quality and processing are key
Video1080p@60fps4K@30fps, 720p@480fpsM35 offers higher resolution video and super slow-motion
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50006000M35 has significantly larger battery, promising longer usage

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The Samsung Galaxy M35, with its newer Exynos 1380 processor and 8GB of RAM, holds a clear advantage in processing power and multitasking capabilities. The Moto G82, while capable for everyday tasks, might show its limitations with demanding applications or heavy multitasking.
  • Display: Both phones offer excellent AMOLED displays with 120Hz refresh rates. However, the "Super AMOLED" designation on the M35 suggests potentially higher brightness and better outdoor visibility. Real-world testing would be needed to confirm this.
  • Battery: The M35's 6000mAh battery significantly outpaces the G82's 5000mAh. This translates to potentially a full day of heavy usage on the M35 compared to needing a top-up on the G82.
  • Camera: While both have 50MP main sensors, the M35's ability to record 4K video and 720p slow-motion at 480fps gives it a clear edge for videography. Image quality will depend on factors beyond resolution, including sensor size, aperture, and processing algorithms.
  • Software: The Galaxy M35 ships with Android 14, offering the latest features and security updates. The Moto G82, running on Android 12, might lack some newer functionalities.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G82: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize a lightweight and pocketable phone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and casual photography.
  • Samsung Galaxy M35: Ideal for users who demand strong performance for gaming, multitasking, and media consumption. The superior battery life and advanced camera features also make it attractive for power users.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G82 is positioned in the "low price" range, while the M35 falls into the "medium price" category.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? For light to moderate usage, the G82 suffices. For heavy usage, gaming, or media creation, the M35 is the better choice.
  3. How important is battery life? If all-day battery life is crucial, the M35's larger battery is a significant advantage.

My Choice: I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M35. While the Moto G82 is a compelling budget option, the M35's superior performance, newer software, significantly larger battery, and more advanced camera capabilities outweigh the price difference for me. As someone who values smooth multitasking, long battery life, and the ability to capture high-quality videos, the M35 aligns better with my needs. The Exynos 1380's efficiency also appeals to me, promising a balance of performance and battery life.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.