Motorola Moto G82 vs Samsung Galaxy A35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 7, 2022 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 95.9 cm³ 103.42 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.82 "/g 3.16 "/g
Weight 173 g 209 g
Height 160.9 mm 161.7 mm
Width 74.5 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Meteorite Gray
  • White Lily
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.7 % 84.8 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.14 mAh/cm³ 48.34 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13 18

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G82 vs. Samsung Galaxy A35: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Motorola Moto G82 and the Samsung Galaxy A35, two compelling contenders in the mid-range smartphone arena. We'll go beyond the spec sheet, translating technical jargon into real-world experiences to help you decide which phone fits your needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G82Samsung Galaxy A35Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.9 x 74.5 x 8161.7 x 78 x 8.2A35 slightly larger, may feel less comfortable in smaller hands.
Weight (g)173209G82 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.6Both offer large, immersive screens for media consumption and gaming.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical sharpness; difference negligible in daily use.
TypeAMOLED, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 120HzBoth provide vibrant colors and smooth scrolling; Super AMOLED potentially offers slightly better contrast.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5GExynos 1380 5GA35 boasts a more powerful, newer processor, likely resulting in smoother multitasking and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2.2 GHz)Octa-core (2.4 GHz)A35's higher clock speed suggests faster app loading and processing.
RAM (GB)66/8A35 offers an 8GB RAM option, beneficial for heavy multitaskers.
OSAndroid 12Android 14A35 ships with a newer Android version, potentially offering more features and longer software support.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Comparable resolution; image quality will depend on sensor and software processing.
Video1080p@60fps4K@30fpsA35 capable of higher resolution video recording.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacities; actual battery life depends on usage and optimization.
Fast Charging30W25WG82 offers slightly faster charging.
Price RangeLowMediumG82 offers greater affordability

2. Key Insights

The Moto G82 shines in its lightweight design and affordability. It's a solid choice for users seeking a comfortable, budget-friendly phone without compromising on essential features like a large AMOLED display and 5G connectivity.

The Samsung Galaxy A35, while pricier, packs a significantly more powerful processor, a newer Android version, and the capability to record 4K video. Its under-display fingerprint sensor also contributes to a more modern aesthetic. The A35 provides a premium experience for users who demand top-tier performance and future-proof software.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Moto G82: Ideal for budget-conscious users, casual gamers, and those prioritizing a lightweight, comfortable phone for everyday use.

Samsung Galaxy A35: Best suited for power users, mobile gamers, photography enthusiasts, and those who value the latest software and a more premium feel.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What's your budget? If affordability is paramount, the G82 is the clear winner.
  • How important is raw performance? For demanding tasks and gaming, the A35's superior processor is crucial.
  • Do you prioritize software updates? The A35's newer Android version ensures longer software support.

Scenario: A student on a tight budget who primarily uses their phone for social media, browsing, and casual photography would be well-served by the Moto G82. A young professional who needs a powerful device for multitasking, gaming, and capturing high-quality videos should opt for the Samsung Galaxy A35.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A35

While the Moto G82 offers excellent value, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A35. The Exynos 1380's significant performance advantage, coupled with the newer Android OS and 4K video recording, justifies the higher price for my needs. As a tech journalist, I often push my devices to their limits with multitasking, content creation, and gaming. The A35's future-proof hardware and software ensure it can handle my workflow for years to come. While I appreciate the G82's lighter weight, the A35's overall package, including the under-display fingerprint sensor (a personal preference), aligns better with my usage patterns and desire for a premium mobile experience. Ultimately, the investment in the A35's superior performance and longevity would be worthwhile for me.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.