Motorola Moto G82 vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 7, 2022 May 5, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 95.9 cm³ 104.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.82 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 173 g 195 g
Height 160.9 mm 162.1 mm
Width 74.5 mm 77.6 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Meteorite Gray
  • White Lily
  • Black
  • Lime Green
  • Blue gradient
  • Dark red

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.7 % 82.4 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.14 mAh/cm³ 47.89 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13 17

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G82 vs. Samsung Galaxy A24 4G: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Motorola Moto G82 and Samsung Galaxy A24 4G, two compelling contenders in the mid-range smartphone arena. We'll go beyond the spec sheet to uncover what these devices offer in real-world use.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G82Samsung Galaxy A24 4GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.9 x 74.5 x 8162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3Moto G82 is slightly smaller and thinner, potentially offering better one-handed use.
Weight (g)173195Moto G82 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.5Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical sharpness; both offer crisp visuals.
TypeAMOLED, 120HzSuper AMOLED, 90HzMoto G82's 120Hz refresh rate delivers smoother scrolling and animations.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5GHelio G99Both offer solid mid-range performance, but Snapdragon 695 may have a slight edge in GPU tasks.
CPUOcta-core (2.2 GHz)Octa-core (2.2 GHz)Comparable CPU performance for everyday tasks.
RAM (GB)66Sufficient RAM for multitasking and smooth app switching.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Comparable main camera resolution; image quality will depend on sensor and processing.
Video1080p@60fps1080p@30fpsMoto G82 offers smoother video recording at 60fps.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacities; real-world battery life will depend on usage patterns.

2. Key Insights

  • Display: The Moto G82's 120Hz display is a clear winner, providing a noticeably smoother and more responsive user experience. While the A24 boasts a Super AMOLED panel with a potential for higher peak brightness, the G82's higher refresh rate significantly impacts daily interactions.

  • Performance: Both chipsets offer respectable performance for everyday tasks. The Snapdragon 695 in the Moto G82 might have a slight advantage in graphics-intensive applications and gaming thanks to its Adreno 619 GPU. However, for general use, including web browsing, social media, and light productivity, both phones should perform adequately.

  • Camera: While both phones boast a 50MP main camera, practical image quality depends heavily on factors beyond resolution, such as sensor size, lens quality, and image processing algorithms. The Moto G82's ability to record 1080p video at 60fps provides a tangible benefit for capturing smoother, more natural-looking footage.

  • 5G Connectivity: The Moto G82 offers 5G connectivity, future-proofing your investment and enabling faster download and streaming speeds in areas with 5G coverage. The A24 is limited to 4G.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G82: Ideal for users who prioritize a smooth and responsive display, value future-proof 5G connectivity, and enjoy capturing videos. Gamers and those who consume a lot of media will appreciate the 120Hz refresh rate.

  • Samsung Galaxy A24 4G: Suitable for users who primarily use their phones for everyday tasks like calling, texting, social media, and light web browsing. The potentially brighter Super AMOLED display might be preferable for outdoor use. Budget-conscious users might find the A24 more appealing if 5G isn't a priority.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • Do you prioritize a smooth and fluid display above all else? If yes, the Moto G82's 120Hz refresh rate is a compelling reason to choose it.

  • Is 5G connectivity essential for you now or in the near future? If yes, the Moto G82 is the only option here.

  • Are you on a tight budget? If yes, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G, being in a lower price range, might be the more sensible choice, provided you can compromise on the display refresh rate and 5G.

My Choice: I would choose the Motorola Moto G82. As a tech journalist, I appreciate the future-proofing of 5G and the tangible benefits of a 120Hz display in everyday use. The smoother scrolling, more responsive gaming, and improved video recording capabilities outweigh the slight size and weight advantages of the A24. While I acknowledge the potential for a brighter display on the A24, the responsiveness of the user interface is paramount to me, making the G82 the clear winner.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.