Motorola Moto G82 vs Samsung Galaxy A23 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 7, 2022 September 2, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 95.9 cm³ 106.84 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.82 "/g 3.35 "/g
Weight 173 g 197 g
Height 160.9 mm 165.4 mm
Width 74.5 mm 76.9 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Meteorite Gray
  • White Lily
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.7 % 82.5 %
Pixel Density 402 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.14 mAh/cm³ 46.8 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 13 14

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G82 vs. Samsung Galaxy A23 5G: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Motorola Moto G82 and Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, two compelling contenders in the mid-range smartphone arena. We'll go beyond the spec sheet to uncover what these devices offer in terms of real-world performance and user experience.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G82Samsung Galaxy A23 5GReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)160.9 x 74.5 x 8165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4Moto G82 is slightly smaller and thinner, potentially more pocketable.
Weight (g)173197Moto G82 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue.
Display
TypeAMOLED, 120HzPLS LCD, 120HzMoto G82's AMOLED offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency in dark mode. Both have smooth 120Hz refresh rates for fluid scrolling and gaming.
Size6.6"6.6"Identical screen sizes provide ample viewing space.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2408Virtually identical resolutions ensure sharp visuals.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 695 5GSnapdragon 695 5GIdentical chipsets suggest similar performance capabilities.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz & 6x1.7 GHz)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz & 6x1.7 GHz)Identical CPU configurations indicate comparable processing power.
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 619Same GPU points to similar gaming and graphics rendering capabilities.
RAM6GB4GB/6GBMoto G82's 6GB RAM configuration reviewed here should offer smoother multitasking compared to the 4GB A23 variant, but is comparable to the 6GB variant.
Camera
Main50MP, f/1.8, OIS50MP, f/1.8, OISBoth feature a 50MP main camera with Optical Image Stabilization for clear, steady shots.
Ultrawide8MP, f/2.25MP, f/2.2Moto G82 boasts a slightly higher resolution ultrawide lens.
Macro2MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4Macro lens resolution is the same on both devices.
Selfie16MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.0Moto G82 has a significantly higher resolution front-facing camera.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhIdentical battery capacities suggest similar potential battery life.
Charging30W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingMoto G82 offers slightly faster charging speeds.

2. Key Insights

  • Display: The Moto G82's AMOLED display is a clear winner, providing vibrant visuals and superior power efficiency compared to the A23 5G's PLS LCD.
  • Performance: Performance should be largely comparable due to the shared chipset and CPU. However, the 6GB RAM variant of the Moto G82 might offer a slight edge in multitasking over the 4GB A23 but is comparable to the 6GB variant.
  • Camera: Both phones offer capable main cameras. However, the Moto G82 pulls ahead with its higher-resolution ultrawide and selfie cameras.
  • Battery: Battery life should be similar, but the Moto G82's faster charging gives it a practical advantage.
  • Software: While both run on Android, Samsung's One UI tends to offer more features and customization options compared to Motorola's near-stock Android experience. This can be a preference depending on the user.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

Moto G82: Ideal for users who prioritize display quality, a lightweight design, faster charging, and a clean Android experience. Excellent for media consumption, casual gaming, and everyday photography.

Samsung Galaxy A23 5G: Suited for users who prefer a feature-rich software experience and don't mind a slightly heavier phone. A good option for those who value Samsung's ecosystem and software features over display quality. The 6GB RAM variant brings it closer in line with the Moto G82 from a multitasking performance standpoint.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. Is display quality a top priority? If yes, the Moto G82's AMOLED screen is the clear choice.
  2. How important is a lightweight and slim phone? The Moto G82 is significantly lighter and thinner.
  3. Do you prefer a feature-rich or clean Android experience? Samsung offers more customization, while Motorola provides a near-stock experience.

My Choice: I would choose the Motorola Moto G82. The superior AMOLED display, lighter weight, faster charging, and cleaner Android experience (my personal preference) outweigh the benefits of Samsung's software features for me. The price difference, if significant, could sway this decision, but based purely on features and experience, the Moto G82 edges out the A23 5G for my needs.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.